KrustyKidd

And the Red Cross likes all symbols except Jewish ones. Hey, cool down a bit Dub. Go find ten Jews and shoot six of them, statistically you will have done your share of taking out the cancer.

To eradicate Zionism is to eradicate Jews as Zionism is specific to Judaism and not Islam, Christianity, Buddhism or whatever. If one were to eradicate Muslims of any country that was a Muslim designated would you not be committing genocide? Is asking for the Muslims of any Muslim country to be eradicated racism or just plain hatred? Same with advocating the eradication of Zionists as you have. That would mean killing over eight million of the estimated 13 million Jews worldwide (90% of Israeli Jews = Zionist and 35% of the rest = e same). Well done Dub! Yuo've certainly outdone yourself today, wishing for the deaths of over eight million fellow human beings based on their religious/nationalistic beliefs.

'Taint nothing compared to the 'shoot 'em up' antics of Fatah and Hamas go through their Chinese weapons inventory in the streets at election time putting more civilians at risk than the Israelis ever could.

And nor did he, or Israel break the Armistice time and time again.

'Taint nothing compared to the 'shoot 'em up' antics of Fatah and Hamas go through their Chinese weapons inventory in the streets at election time putting more civillians at risk than the Israelis ever could.

When will these nuts realize that until hamas stops using their cities and people as props to conduct terrorism, it is a war zone? The nut in question has a history of being a nut She owes Israel an apology in this case as do all the rest of the pony tailed losers for not understanding what a war zone and a blockade means.

For starters, you are a Jew hater and this is the well you continually return to to find fodder to justify the eradication of the 'cancer' you consider to be the nation of Israel. A quick Google Came up with this among thousands of others The Red Cross discriminates against Jews by allowing Red Crescent but not the Star of David for Magen David Adom You can rad about it here.

Hell, even

A lot of them are. In any case, AI admits bias when dealing with democracies vs more repressed societies. From Wiki AI Link In other words, it is easier for them to interview and photograph during the Hamas wine and cheese tour as they will certainly bash Israel than it is to tour Israel and interview and photograph rocket damage fairly, then get beaten and shot for being Israeli puppets when they go to interview people in Gaza.

No kidding. Dub Sure he did and, on a few occasions both in writing and in speeches. Ben Gurion Ben Gurion Ben Gurion (Spending 15 minutes reading aloud the declaration of Independence 15 May 1948)

No sorry. I just know what I'm dealing with Dub. You don't fool anybody. Dub Hitler Osama Bin Laden Khaled Meshal

Nobody I can recall has said Palestinians are bad much less villified them in any way. The hate seems to be comming from one direction. I would put up a smiley on this post but seriously, continual hate of one nation and it's people is something a lot of my countrymen sacrificed a lot to stop. And here, you find it alive and well and, you're part of it.

"zionists are a cancer to this world." Rightwing level headed people - 1 Racist Jew Hating Fools and Drea - 0

OMG! Dub, explain please. How did the UN create Israel? I thought the Israelis never adhered to the UN so how is this possible??????????? Or are you lying and the UN did not help to create Israel?

how many more obstacles before it is obvious to apologists?? it is irrelevant, that is why their are apologists. They can never make too many excuses. Arabs never have wanted peace nor cares about international law, it is not part of their agenda. Therefore it is moot, to Arabs and those countries apologists.

Like I said, I nver thought that and, I read the same material. Yes, that would be very bad as you may find yourself with a nuclear armed Taliban ruled country of a fifth of a billion people. That is the one place that has to be last on the list as a lot of attention and resources is going to be needed. That's for sure however, it held perfect ground with which to act in the area - specifically SA. Pretty moot now as that has occurred. Does he? Is 2011 an indefinite time? That's when he gets the first troops out. Fifty thousand stay indefinitely (read a hundred years or, closer to forever than McCain said.)

I certainly never thought that and yes, I agree, he is a poor communicator and should have explained it better. However, it is not his job to confront every pot headed theory on the net but yes, in certain things, he should have done better. They were never in danger of invasion however, they certainly were in danger of having the US conduct anti terrorism raids on their soil if they didn't do it themselves. They will never admit that that is the reason they miraculously began to crack down on Al Qaeda and financing and, the US will never say they ever intended to attack and occupy if necessary, any real or perceived (read oilfeild) AQ training facilities as part and parcel of the Bush Doctrine #2 We will fight and defeat the forces of evil wherever they are. gee isn't that what I just quoted? Here's the transcript; And double gee, isn't that Obama's strategy? He intends to keep fifty thousand troops in Iraq in case they're needed to fight terrorism in the area. And triple gee, isn't that one of the reasons I said Bush invaded Iraq to begin with? Golly, no wonder so many people thought Saddam was responsible for 911, they're fucking idiots who can't read or listen. And now, they're back again saying McCain wanted to fight in Iraq forever.

Edited to add: I would agree but then, Bush was a terrible communicator so part of that is many did not understand the entire problem and underlying reasons for many actions. The invasion certainly got the Royals to stop sitting on their hands and participate for a change. I'd like to have a quote that shows that as the only one I have seen is one in which he speaks of a US presence there similar to the US presence in South Korea or Germany.

I agree for once. Time for me to join you in the fight to get Hamas to stop putting their people at risk by using their neighborhoods as military bases.

Not saying anything, just giving you the rational for the invasion. With at least a dozen reasons, Bush did what any leader does when he brings an action forth to the people, picks one that will work best. He chose WMDs. If he began to spell out Qutbism for the masses, it would have put them to sleep after fifteen minutes and would not even have gotten past the beliefs to how they are a threat. The danger of not being there was watching Saudi Arabia turn out Qutbist Jihadists like a Pez Dispenser. That problem has been brought under control thanks to the Iraq action. Can you name any that believe that? Forever is a long time.

The same report written by Jew haters like you? Yes, that should be taken seriously!

Our own little Hitler Bin Laden!

And the people of Israel spell it out for you in the declaration.

Hamas Uses Human Shields