Rue

Good luck on that one. You make a lot of assumptions about a hell of a lot of people and what they have experienced in their lives.. Read it back. Where do you get off telling any black person how they should feel? Is your idea of educating them telling them what they should feel? Why stop there? Tell gays, Jews, women, Chinese, aboriginal, Muslims, any group you can think of how they should feel. Go on tell them all. Tell them their experiences are not real, only what you tell them is.Good luck on that. Oh come now Dog you wanna teach blacks to listen to Elvis and pretend they don't know who Big Mama Thorton was? I give you 5 minutes until 1 of your student's gives you 2 fat lips and a flat nose. Careful. I still want you to come to my class, Jewish Sarcasm 102.

Your words evidence racist expression of the worst kind. When a tragedy happens like a fly to shit you are there making slurs about all blacks using the tragedy as an opportunity to pass off your racist hatred as political opinion. Your words are vile filth. To write them exhibits what you have to offer, with those words, bitterness, hatred

I think Dog this kind of stuff unites all blacks and it also makes all people distrust cops. Cops are in that sense visible minorities. People are quick to negatively blame them all, the way some do with blacks. They all look the same. When this crap happens black and white leaders, leaders from all communities need to come together, share their outrage but tell people to stay calm. It is easier said than done. You ever tell a kid raped by his father to stay calm? I have. You think its easy? You so sure?

That cop with the knee looked like a scrawny guy. The other cops ignoring him and his knee were 2 white and 1 Chinese and none of them black. Would a black cop have done that to the guy? Would the white guy have done that to another white guy? Would the Chinese cop have done that to a white, black or Chinese person? Those are the questions ignited by the film. Everyone now acts angrily assuming the answers based on their own biases. The fact is none of us know what the phack that cop was thinking and people are too angry to care... they want that cop punished with an open transparent court proceeding. The anger will be reignited during the trial. No good will come of this. Everyone is angry. Even cops. They do not a cop like that making matters worse.

No they happen in all black communities regardless of their political beliefs and financial levels. Especially after this incident. Its just people in nice homes will not burn them down.

Nothing to do with capitalism everything to do with culture and values. Poor people and socialists are just as racist if not more so.

Please the Richard riot in Montreal makes that one look tame. Actually Bush you are right other than 2 hockey riots and one rebellion with Louiis Riel we do not have that. We do have liberal guilt parades in reaction to this kind of stuff and some black lives matter rallies but nothing close.

You and Shady are both right. The actual percentage does not have to be higher than what Shadh said but what you said is also true. Som ed viruses mutate like Sars and become very difficult to catch but become more deadly. For some reason this particular covid strain seems to be completely unpredictable. You can have as we know people with immunity issues, diabetes, heart disease, lung disease, arthritis, cancer, age all fatally killed by it but sometimes health people too. They are still trying to figure out why it makes blood clot.

Bogey Saabs the car is a piece of doodoo but the jet is a good one. Good write ups. The F35 has the lobby group that owns both thd Libs and Tories and they did what Argus mentioned. They offered the most jobs in Canada. The jet is an overpriced nightmare but mp's want it to get jobs in their ridings. Lol you trust American cars these days? Not me. I have a Kia. Its fiberglass but its idiot proof. The Grippen is the solution. P.s. I never liked Mats Sundin. Borje Salming yes. IKEA no. ABBA hell no. We could get more Grippens, they are easier to maintain, land on ice, and leave money forvou ef navy. Ah who are we kidding. Our F18's like everything else will be pushed too far and like our Tudors endanger our pilots. I hear Trudeau will hire summercdtudrnts to fly model jets and they will call them th ed new scales down air force.

It's still a problem in Toronto and Mississauga where I live.

Lol I find you important! I visited Helsinki. I am a Montreal Canadiens fan. Saku Koivu. We loved him!

I am surprised the usual did not comment about Dr. Tam being a transgender.

UpThe thread suggests the US is evil and for your any of uourcrespobses be predicated on that assumption. It trolls by limiting answers to having to conform to one premises. It's been repeated on this forum continuously with clumsy lead in to the Tdot labelled anti US rants. The syntax on all the lead ins is CV identical to those under the Tdot label. If you do get a response trust me it won't be from Nevada. The premises of the thread is deliberately stupid to fish for anti US responders.

First, I inferred nothing of you. I was discussing why the land lease to Hong Kong provided no legal basis for the UK to have done what you suggest. Second, claiming Thatcher made a mistake is illogical. The law predicated how the lease would end not her. She never drafted the lease. In regards to Hong Kong's right to determine it's own government that is termed suffrage. Its right to sufferage or political independence can not be decided by the UN only the people of Hong Kong and the government they may wish to cede from. The UN declaration if read properly does not deny their rights but it does say Hong Kong is legally a city in China under the Chinese government so under the principle of sovereignty other countries can be sympathetic and offer humanitarian support but can not invade the country on to change the government. The system I refer to is international law and the international laws of sovereignty and suffrage and defacto recognition of legal rights. I sympathize with Hong Kong citizens but interfering in the internal affairs of a country whose ideology we may find unacceptable is complex and unlimited. Invading g a country to free it's people from tyranny is the first thing a totalitarian regime uses as its pretext to invade and conquer and so for that reason we have international laws to try stop illegal invasions protected as liberating a country. That said if China had any common sense it would ease up on Hong Kong not tighten the noose. The problem is the current political regime feels it will loose face if it did weakening its control over all of China not just Hong Kong. Many countries choose to not recognize Tauwan because China says if you recognize them we will not deal with you and the countries that cower to that threat I personally believe are wrong but that is another issue non legal and in fact political and for me governments capitulating to China because of its economic control over their debts is cowardly.As you are aware countries have sold themselves out to China and for that reason Taiwan and Hong Kong should not expect any open support from such nations. Interestingly though Israel strongly supports Taiwan as an ally but Communist China government also has relations with Israel because China can't afford to have Israel invade Iran and has internal issues with its Muslims non Chinese Muslim terrorist groups are aiding so it asks for intelligence from Israel with such groups. Bottom line, if China needs something it knows how to compromise. It is not the invincible Tiger it is portrayed as. Its petrified of it's own By the way Taiwan is prosperous. The same two faced hypocrites who do not recognize it openly are only to happy to do business with it without a formal relationship.

Now Canadians...seriously Canadians...why don't you. It's dead. The headline, lead in, talking to your multiple voices...done. the Nevada sun dried them out.

Yes and you are from Nevada. I got it.

Hey now that was real subtle.

Yes I try correct my spelling and typo errors . Lol, I also note the person calling me out for editing does the same as repeatedly indicated under his posts. I also interpret the writer's continual reference of himself as "we" indication he has been programmed to suppress his individual identity to a prescribed larger identity that's been superimposed upon him. This could also explain why he might see nationality like individuality to be an undesirable deviation. - A man who insists on exposing his shortcomings should not stand next to Shaq O'Neil. - Rue

Uh yah Nevada. I come from sperm and an egg.Guess whose explanation can be verified. Oh go on.Nevada. No. Kansas. Dorothy told me. Listen, the need to stereotype all Canadians in one lump identity as well as yourself with the label Yank, everytime you do respond is lame. Next, can you share a thought other than you don't like the US and want Canadians to dislike the US too. Your comments incite people to find ways to share dislike of the US using Trump as the buzz word to do it. Like its overk kill Boris. Spend some time with Natasha before she runs away with the Moose. God Bless Aunty Emm. Regards, Flying Monkey Squadron member 009, Wally Cox, Don Adams

Yah...I do that with Justine T .

Britain had no legal authority to do that. Issues as two recognizing another nation's legitimate ruler are complex but in the case of Taiwan could not be unilaterally decided by the UK. It had nothing to do with China and everything to do with international law and its concept of sovereignty. Legally, Taiwa and China are defacto separate states with equal rights to separate sovereignty. So any discussion as to whether either state should rule the other is between those two nations and the international world must remain neutral. If China tried to force rule on Taiwan or vice versa that would in law be equally as wrong at this point in time. As for Hong Kong if they argued they want to be a separate nation from China like Singapore did or join with Taiwan which no Hong Kong citizen necessarily argues they want to do, or remain with mainland China but with a free trade zone is a matter ultimately Hong Kong citizens must decide and that will entail dealing with their government. Decisions as to who rules a nation in law should come from its citizens. The concept of sovereignty says countries have equal rights and so invading them to side with or impose a government is illegal. Technically in regards to recognizing Taiwan's Nationalist government not the Maoists as the rightful ruler of China, this is no longer up to a foreign government to decide. De facto conditions or on-going reality if uninterupted even if not agreed to leads to legal rights and status in international law. It is akin to property rights. If you squat on property you do not own uninterupted for more than 5 years, you gain legal right to it since the rightful owner made no effort to get it back. So because Taiwan never attempted to physically regain mainland China it lost it's right to claim sovereignty over it and vice versa with China's mainland government to physically retake Taiwan. That may not make sense to you but its why nations can support Taiwan if she is attacked defend herself but can not join Taiwan in an unprovoked war to take back China. As for Hong Kong the treaty did not give the UK any right to decide which government in China to give back the Hong Kong the land to only the one adjacent to Hong Kong. Hong Kong is legally Chinese. Hong Kong in that treaty was defined as a geographic territory not it's people and it defined the government it was leased from not with a specific type of government only the geographic area where Hong Kong was detached from. Hong Kong was never attached to Taiwan. Further commplicating matters, Taiwan had a government before Chang Hai Shek and his Nationalist Party fled there and took it over. Neither Nationalists or Communists had a superior right over the other to rule China or Taiwan, now they do from uninterupted rule. Edited for typos.

There you go it was bound to come out. Hey now why are you so upset. I edit spelling and grammar never my positions including the one that believes you came here to recruit. Who your organization is behind the one you prop is immaterial. The cultist fluff is annoying. This is where you say one for all and all for one it was inspired by Episcopalians. Now as for Three Muskateers the Mickey Mouse Club, Church of Satan, Koolaid Kids or whoever else you belong to, I do not care. I contend you spew cultist chants. Of course you snap. That veneer of civility is for recruiting purpose. Oops you slipped. Now we see how you will really deal with political opposition. Lol. So you want to lock me up? Will you lock people up for not following your gospel? Oh go on tell me. Tell me about your legal enforcement of laws. Lol you won't because your system to function would need people with red kerchiefs or brown shirts and you don't dare discuss that now do you? Lol. I say, if it walks like a duck and poops like a duck, it's a sovereigntist. Quack. Thank you for your courtesy and have a nice day.

Now Canadians...seriously Canadians...why don't you.

Oh look another "new" poster starting off a thread pissing on the US and calling it evil. That's original. These attempts to engage in multiplying names that come on this forum, incite anti American responses and then have the thread starter vanishing, are clumsy repetitive because it's a bot with a programmed script fishing for names and trying to incite anti American comments. Whether it wants names of anti Americans or is just trying to incite I do not know but its latest cycle commenced at the beginning of the Covid 19 issues. This bot has polluted the board posing as a forum member. It's not a human. The script is preprogrammed and sent to numerous forums. it has tried to dominate the US sections. When that did not work in other subject areas very well so it moved on.it always heads back to the US threads and if you challenge it, it vanishes then shows up yet again with a new name and anti US pretext. You will never see it go more than a fixed no. of posts orvanswer directly anyone's comments. It can respond to specific words but the responses will be generic and limited. The syntax, use of headlines, identical.

The black and red symbol is a coincidence.lol.