Rue

Not necesssarily. The enemy of your enemy is not your friend just because of a temporary inconvenience that prevents them from killing you in the moment of inconvenience. Been there lived that. The bullet is a second away from anyone anywhere, at any moment. It's also usually the person you agree with who shoots you in the back. Such is the way of homo sapiens. Regards, Julius Caesar

Take a look at the Tdot Godzilla threads. Take a look at the starter headlines and responses. Same scripts. I urge everyone to ignore them and watch how fast they will repeat with a new name. Also take note of the new posters who come on their threads then vanish.

Wes and Eye do not blow a kidney. This thread as other US threads from Godzillaand Tdot come from the exact same place. You should start your own thread and ignore the trolling bots on this forum.

I fully support Ford's approach. I like his no b.s. briefings. Steady as you go fatso you are doing a great job.

This thread serves as a vehicle to fart posing it as Islamic preachings. Why would anyone debate someonec whose agenda is to proselytize to Islam people. Its flammable man keep a distance with your cigarettes or as the British call them butts fags.

Disagreeing or questioning with Maroc on anything.

Science is not religion. It also doesn't claim to be fallible like your religion and idol Muhammed. Objective methodology processes are not based on faith. You have made it clear in your world anything you disagree with and/or is against your teachings is evil and to be destroyed and/or hated. It aint rocket science to figure your calculation [ what I think I was taught from Islam ] = [ the only acceptable thoughts ]. Here let me finish that equation... = [ farting noises using references to the Koran ]. I trust that is clear. People who use religious dogma to fart shouldn't expect others to want to sniff it. Stand down wind at least when you preach.

Hey lets' give credit where it is due, go back one more step to horses. No one seems have horse sense but they do seem to be capable of of producing a lot horse shit and the ones producing the most claim others made that shit and expect other to pick it up for them. .there is a limit to how much shit I take responsibility for.

Three answers with possible explanations: 1-Aliens came and seeded homo sapiens to accelerate our evolutionary process so we could be used as manual labourers to get gold for them. Then the aliens left and we grew like weeds. We are an artificial invasive predatory/parasitical species. Blame the Anuunaki. 2- You insist on being a meat eater. 3-You own a hamburger franchise.

Didn't take you long to blame them injuns again. Is anything not their fault? Please show your evidence of injuns being to blame for gun smuggling. Or is it gonna be another one of those personal anecdotes again. N Banana is to blame. Do not blame me. My people sell smoked meat and bagels. You could use a stale bagel as a weapon.

Big Macs shrink your brain. Do not eat them.

They are both poo. Poo is poo.

He's waiting to get his next script from his bosses in the party before he can respond. Maybe his immediate handler died of Covid. Chinese communist party members die from Covid or henta virus too you know. Or maybe he was called back and is being replacd by another spokesperson. You may have exasperated him. Also CTV news has run the news story two days in a row.. now that Asian orange head hornets are headed to Canada to eat up all the honey bees. Is that a code for something? Sounds like Trump is responsible. the name orange head gave him away.

Excellent points. Defer. Just for clarification I have no preconceived ideas of others you call agnostics or gnostics or myself. I claim to barely begin to understand myself let alone you or others. I know I am culturally, ethnically and reform Jewish but you know I could easily for the same reasons be gnostic Christian, Unitarian, Buddhist, Taoist, wingnut to others and feel quite comfortable with you referring to md as gnostic but yah I would not presume about others other than to presume they are unique and entitled to be treated the the way I want to be treated. When you call me gnostic its complementary...but I do not claim to be enlightened or presume it in others. All I know is when someone is respectful like you are and welcomes my words and does not reject my stab at these discussions as you do I consider youa fellow student. I struggle for the same answers as you do. Like you someone depicting God as enjoying evil or not caring about life, I probably disagree with at a certain level of reference...in my presentvxtatd I find human emotional projections illogical and subjective distortions. I do not claim to know as fact this just subjective opinion which I say is defective. In your case what you call Satan for me is negative energy projected by human and higher evolved life forms or energy sources and it mutates in form, intensity, appearance..it can look no different han positive energy if one is at a place and time that distorts their ability to pereceive clearly without undue interference as to free choice or bec ablea to conceive absolutely without distortion which may or may not be possible...if you believe Buddhists or Hindus they say it is possible to get to that state...what do I know...

French P. You choose to discuss religion. I note the troll who tries to buzz you. That said... I would contend to be able to understand good we also must understand evil because our enlightenment depends on a constant dialectical conflict between the two to fuel the movement towards more developed enlightenment through the lessons learned in those conflicts.So using that construct, I do not define the path to enlightenment as something "God" would "enjoy". If there is an origin or creator of this spiritual path we chose, I would speculate it probably is beyond human descriptions of enjoyment, pain, joy, sorrow or anything in our current state we could truly understand including even assuming it I also think the closer one claims get to understanding what they call God through developing their own enlightenment, they may also be fabricating simply their own truths and not necessarily all encompassing truth which I believe remains forever outside the reach of any path of enlightenment. I also appreciate many need to project or ascribe to a God human qualities ...just as we see human faces in clouds or human qualities in our pets or believe all alien life forms will look like us and speak English. It's easier to grasp than referencing God as a concept of energy and quantum physics. I also appreciate many of us feel the need to be comforted by a God that is all knowing and forgiving and expressed through a human vessel not a burning bush I respect and people's constructs if they are loving, tolerant, peaceful. If they are used to incite hatred, intolerance, evil, then I probably by destined choice may choose to clash...what motivates the decision to go to war depends on how badly one wants goodness to prevail over evil...in any battle the best anyone achieves is a temporary treaty or pause... Evil like goodness takes on any form and pretense. In that sense they have the exact same appearance. It takes more than the 5 senses or logic to discern Satan from God using those humanesque andcromantic terms of good and evil It's why I like canines or felines or animals. Their ability to discern the differences is far more acute. Unlike homo sapiens they have no ego to distort their perceptions abilities. To become enlightened one needs to observe animal behaviour. I find horses, canines, felines, pigs, birds, insects, whales, make excellent Rabbias.

Same reason Tdot and Maroc are on this forum. You should have discerned a repeating and common script and agenda in all 3 by now. These are scripts to incite anti American sentiment on the forum and people take the bait. They fish. What they fish for they will not catch. The same reason the Grand Banks is not so grand anymore. Overkill. They need to take their fleets back home now or go destroy someone else's fishing grounds. Nothing here to catch.

Is that like a riddle? Question: When do you discuss kama sutra with a Muslim fundamentalist, pimple faced virgin and chronic masterbator (troll)? Answer: After they pay me. That shit is not covered by OHIP.

This issue is a lot like the abortion issue. It incites highly emotional responses based on preconceived values. 1. Trudeau did not explain how they came to the determination that the guns they put on their list (1,500) are ONLY purchased to kill people let alone are more deadly than the ones not on the list;2. Trudeau has not explained how the banning of the 1,500 long guns he chose, prevent people from taking other long guns and re-calibrating them to be as dangerous if not more dangerous than the ones he banned;3. Trudeau has not explained how banning any long gun prevents illegal ones from being purchased and used in crimes. Most of us may dislike guns. Its not the issue. Personal dislike is not how we base a law. That is far too subjective. This initiative was done to score brownie points and exploit a tragedy for Trudeau-the timing of the announcement makes that crystal clear. Most people debating this issue can not explain what an assault rifle is. Any rifle is a weapon. Most people use the word assault meaning rapid fire. Rapid fire or ability to be rapid fire in itself does not determine whether a rifle is a assault or non assault rifle and the fact Trudeau uses the term assault shows he hasn't a damn clue what a rifle is let alone what kind of rapid fire rifles are dangerous. I hate laws made by knee jerk emotional feel good fear responses. Good laws mean properly defining what it is you are doing and not pronouncing subjective stereotypes of weapons. No I do not think hand guns should be allowed outside gun clubs. I worry about police responding on routine traffic stops and domestic conflict charges with weapons yes. Yes I do want weapons regulated. However I did unlike Trudeau listen and read to what hunting associations, gun club associations and certain others with expertise in weapons have said. I also defer to people who know about the actual weapon it is we speak of. The tragedy in Nova Scotia, in Montreal, will NOT be prevented by simply banning certain kinds of weapons. The issue is deep and is part of a more complex issue as to who SHOULD own any weapon. Rural people who depend on hunting to eat and protect themselves from rabid animals need their rifles as a necessity. I have not heard sufficiently from Trudeau to indicate he even knows what a rifle is let alone an assault one to take him seriously. I do not want specific military weapons to be able to be purchased by citizens so do most gun club owners and hunting associations and those supporting guns on this thread. That is not the issue. Its how you define those specific weapons and even then banning them is wishful thinking in terms of thinking it stops them from being obtained illegally. Illegal trafficking of weapons is the issue. If you make something illegal, sometimes that makes it easier to engage in and sell, i.e, liquor. Liquor is as deadly as weapons in the wrong hands. We tried banning it. Didn't work. So what we really need to address is how to control ILLEGALLY OBTAINED weapons. As for screening suitable owners of rifles, good luck. You ask me the entire homo sapiens species is deranged and should not have anything sharp or pointed. Where do you want to start to control us and how? Easier said than actually done in practice.

Dogs? Is it a pitbull?

This thread engages exactly in the identical script and thread starter formula you use over and over. The feigned indignity was on cue. Thank you for illustrating how your narcissism pushes you now to use multiple identities as you grow more desperate to try incite. ..you are as subtle as an elephant with diaheria.

Where was this democracy? How long did it last? Democracy? Oh do explain.

Your attempt to lecture about Marx is hilarious is based on parroting what you read. Life is more than reading a text. Your words man ...they manifest a virgin lecturing someone who was raped what sexual intercourse is.....dude buy some clearasil.

Your attempt to patronize someone who lived in a communist country reads like someone born into wealth, comfort, and a silver spoon. Read it back. Your words reflects what you read not lived. Your words try to lecture something you never experienced but read on the internet.

It makes sense to you? How?. Using your reasoning all guns should be banned. How do you know the difference between any gun let alone a toy or real one let alone an assault rifle from a non assault rifle? You clearly do not. So you make no sense. You are hyped on thinking any weapon is evil. No law can not be based on subjective fear perceptions to make sense. You are being emotionally manipulated by a politican playing your fears.

I defer to all Godess's comments. I believe how women should be dressed is an issue for them to decide as individuals. As a man I will dress the way I want. I do not go about naked out of a basic decency for my fellow homo sapiens who do not need such a sight. On that note it is absurd for Maroc to call anyone racist and then exhibit intolerance to others and perpetuate concepts based on sexual identity needing to be repressed with attire. Thank you I do not need a burkha to help me control my penis Maroc. Some of us have evolved past that.