Sa'adoni

6 years later, lets just take a hunch. One fraud is enough, out with them!

yeah they cheated. people shouldn't be able to cheat pay 50,000 dollars and keep 15 seats they cheated to win. Embezzlement of tax payer dollars is still embezzlement even if you pay it back after you get caught. People went to jail when the liberals did it.\\\ 486. (1) Every candidate who contravenes subsection 83(1) (failure to appoint official agent) or 83(2) (failure to appoint auditor), section 87 (failure to appoint a replacement official agent or auditor), subsection 92.2(1) (accepting prohibited gift or other advantage) or 92.2(5) (failure to provide statement within required period) or paragraph 92.6( (providing incomplete statement) is guilty of an offence. Marginal note:Offences requiring intent — summary conviction (2) Every person who contravenes subsection 81(1) (refusal to give access to building or gated community) or subsection 81.1(1) (refusal to give access to place open to the public) is guilty of an offence. Marginal note:Offences requiring intent — dual procedure (3) Every person is guilty of an offence who (a) contravenes section 89 (signing of nomination paper when ineligible); ( wilfully contravenes subsection 90(1) (ineligible person acting as official agent) or 90(2) (ineligible person acting as auditor); © contravenes section 91 (making false statement re candidate); (d) contravenes section 92 (publication of false statement of withdrawal of candidate); (e) being a candidate, wilfully contravenes subsection 92.2(1) (accepting prohibited gift or other advantage); (f) being a candidate, wilfully contravenes subsection 92.2(5) (failure to provide statement within required period); or (g) being a candidate, contravenes paragraph 92.6(a) (providing statement containing false or misleading information) or knowingly contravenes paragraph 92.6( (providing incomplete statement). 2000, c. 9, s. 486; 2006, c. 9, s. 56; 2007, c. 21, s. 37. Previous Version just before the next set of rules they broke this past election... and it is criminal... Strict liability offences — summary conviction summary convictions are actually considered crimes, just like indictable offences. with real jail 92.6 No candidate shall provide the Chief Electoral Officer with a statement referred to in subsection 92.2(3) that (a) the candidate knows or ought reasonably to know contains a material statement that is false or misleading; or ( does not substantially set out the information required by that subsection. 2006, c. 9, s. 40. Yet a reasonable person, including candidates both checked this, and contacted the conservative headquarters to verify. Meanwhile the conservative headquarters provided information which was not legally accurate or intentionally provided false information. But a reasonable person would know that it was illegal. Those reasonable people should have contacted their lawyers not party headquarters for legal advice. Anyone with half a brain could tell that moving money around to make it look like you are underspending is illegal, for elections. (The party exercised willful negligence in not verifying with elections canada on the issue - they were complicit with election fraud the party must be disbanded. Allowing the party to exist and continue to commit electoral fraud will only further destroy democracy, they must be smitten.) This is yet another reason why parties should have no legal standing or financial benefits. They broke the law end of story. They committed election fraud multiple times. BOOT THEM OUT AND DON'T LET THEM BACK! It is undemocratic to let them stay in office. Anyone who was complicit in these electoral frauds including the party as an organization - its board and candidates who were should be locked out. Anyone legally responsible for what happened should be locked out. This is true of the election fraud in 2006, the election fraud in 2008 and the election fraud in 2011.

6 years later and we know now, they cheated. http://www.winnipegfreepress.com/canada/tories-drop-supreme-court-appeal-over-2006-dispute-with-elections-canada-141688623.html According of this a number of MPs are ineligible for office as of 2006.. and they are still ineligible. Including the defence minister I believe. They were legally ineligible to run in 2008 due to election fraud in 2006. Likewise every election since then since ineligibility is for life. And the party should be de-registered for this massive election fraud. ILLEGITIMATE!!!! http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QXwm_P6TKIo How the hell can the governor general continue to let them sit, they ARE ELECTION FRAUDSTERS IN A FREE AND DEMOCRATIC SOCIETY WE CANNOT LET ELECTION FRAUDSTERS RUN THE GOVERNMENT. DISSOLVE PARLIAMENT AND BAR THOSE WHO COMMITTED THE FRAUDS FROM RUNNING AGAIN. LIKEWISE DISSOLVE THE CONSERVATIVE PARTY THEY ARE CRIMINALS. IT TURNS PRISON BUILDING PROGRAMS INTO HOME BUILDING PROGRAMS FOR THE PARTY. ILLEGITIMATE!!!!

I looked didn't see it, it is there now..

6 years later and we know now, they cheated. http://www.winnipegfreepress.com/canada/tories-drop-supreme-court-appeal-over-2006-dispute-with-elections-canada-141688623.html According of this a number of MPs are ineligible for office as of 2006.. and they are still ineligible. Including the defence minister I believe. They were legally ineligible to run in 2008 due to election fraud in 2006. Likewise every election since then since ineligibility is for life. And the party should be de-registered for this massive election fraud.

That will take time, but I do advocate this for the "national information grid" this would be a citizens internet that is only accessable by approved secure devices. secure sales would be required to be done via this network, government transactions, any companies subject to laws such as financial institutions etc.. it would not be connected to the internet - anyone who did so would be liable to major penalties like life in prison/ or hard labour etc... canadian credit cards wounldn't work on the "old internet" public libraries and educational material, etc.. would be provided for free on this network. and citizens given "templates" to make webpages from. foreign addresses and non residents would be blocked from accessing the information. Information would only be 1 way to the "authorized" user. individuals would be given access to things based on their security clearance level. --- "the old internet would be turned into an unregulated no mans land" but noone should expect security on it, or continuity of service. there would be two modes for the old internet "the free net" and the "safe net" safe net would only be approved websites, while "free net" would be anything goes. Free net accounts however would be registered for - only adults would be given access to the "free net"

I support this measure. Canada shouldn't be having the public taxed to fund any foreign groups. Usually it is connected with corruption and political interference. Canada as a state has no business meddling in other countries affairs. If people want to pay for overseas organizations they should be free to do so, but people shoulnd't be getting taxed by force to do it. The environment is a public interest so it should have charity status. money into Canada is good, if they provide false information or violate the law in doing so, that is what the courts are for. I agree 150% Charities need more support not less. It needn't be money but it should be in the form of making it easier for charities to operate - afterall charities serve the public benefit through education, alleviation of poverty and improving the public benefit.

They should completely remote MP salaries and political aid salaries. Likewise they should only allow not allow currently serving legislators to serve on the executive. Legislators could always be "appointed up" to the executive but they should abandon their seat if they do, so they can focus on their job. The government shouldn't be paying for support staff that isn't "government owned". If we need more representatives make more ridings, not more paid assistants to divert communications from the actual representative. Only a modest service pension should be provided if the MP is in hardship. Likewise residence costs and work related transportation should be taken into consideration. Weeding out the people more concerned about their paycheck than public service is a good first go at improving the system. For running a deficit and debt they sure have a greater sense of entitlement than they should. Competent people don't run a productive and growing public economy into massive debt. They should have their payments and pensions after hardship considerations adjusted to pay down the debt they racked up. I'm really surprised the general public is paying for business people to watch sports games? http://www.canada.com/sports/Flaherty+rejects+Ontario+sports+ticket+break/6255008/story.html Funding sports and athletics is one thing, but it is pretty sad when the sports poeple say no one in their right mind would pay to watch our sports. You know some people don't make enough for tax deductions.. Wouldn't it make more sense to give the free tickets to people who can't payfor them, than those who make enough not to need to pay for them? Why fill the stands with people who really couldn't be bothered to a buy a ticket if it ain't free? What they arn't good enough for sponserships? Fundraising? Why not just give direct subsidy rather than free tickets andmake the stands open first come first serve, rather than only letting the rich have access to games? Or nationalize it so that these subsidies don't serve as a funnel to pay already very wealthy people a margin on the ownership of their multimillion dollar sports team. Maybe the public should be getting the profits back... afterall the teams are profitable right? Why are the rich tycoons getting the cheese from the public udder, shouldn't it be the starving youth.. why the hell are we paying public tax dollars to make people rich for providing a luxury service to the weathly.. it ain't just the wealthy who pay taxes. Have the FING leauge pay for your freetickets the NHL actually makes money have them pay for your charity. It should be a loan, if people don't want to support it it dies,welcome to the real world. The world faced by thousands of not for profits that go in debt. Businesses fail, why the hell are we floating yours? Why the hell obsesse at the commercial level, there is plenty hockey to go around. I don't want a future debt to pay for a commercial business to operate.. with no expectation to operate on anything but charity. Why the hell are we going in debt for ottawa to have a hockey team they won't pay to go see play? Plenty of rich people in ottawa.. but hold on they don't like hockey? .. but don't all canadians like hockey. BOO MR. FLAHRETY you are squandering tax dollars. If there is no money in it for the public purse why the hell are you supporting it, corruption much? But wouldn't you and Mr. Harper play for the ticket, you could probably fill 150 or so paying seats from your caucus alone. If people don't support it from their pockets, why should we support it from ours.. that is DEBT INTEREST BEARING DEBT. You are being an irresponsible hack. This is why tax write off fail, it should only be a consideration on the basis of hardship, these are nothing but engineering support for non supported busiesses by general corruption. The public should not be paying for business perks. Only health social welfare and basic needs that are unmet. END CORPORATE WELFARE CORPORATIONS DON'T HAVE BASIC NEEDS! END THE WRITE OFFS. PAYDOWN THE DEBT RUN 0 DEFICIT AND END INCOME TAXES!

I find it funny people are still supporting the party when they have shown themselves to be corrupt and completely ignorant of rule of law. You people should be asshamed of yourselves for supporting a party that so flagrantly violates the basic principles of democracy.

At present them admitting to violating Elections Canada's request not to give out polling location information is compelling. If you didn't know, that's what Elections Canada does not the parties, know why? 43. No person shall (a) wilfully obstruct an election officer in the performance of his or her duties; ( without authority, use identification simulating that used by a revising agent or intended to replace that prescribed by the Chief Electoral Officer for that purpose; or © having been replaced as an election officer, fail to give to their replacement or to an authorized person any election documents or other election materials that the person has received or prepared in the performance of his or her duties. Directly refusing a directive not to give out polling information is complicit in that since it is their duty to do so, and giving out NOT UP TO DATE information or incorrect information directly obstructs duties of the elections official. IT IS NOT THE ROLE OF THE PARTIES TO ADMINISTER THE ELECTION, ONLY OBSERVE IT! If people ask about polls they should be referred to elections Canada, and the correct electoral officials. They violated the law again. one should also question the consideration of broadcasting vs. telecommunications, if that telecommunications is a prerecorded message that is sent to masses of people.

One step closer.. http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052970203458604577263463423624778.html?mod=googlenews_wsj

Human error, the major parties (top 2 in the previous elections) control the polls, and nominate elections the staff, making it a potentially biased an partisan cotrolled process, not an unbiased process. There are many potential issues with human oversight of elections, only overshadowed by the fact judges are politically appointed not voted into office. The only way voting will be known to be fair is to make it public and have people confirm their votes as correct. A public roll, that is able to be verified is the only way elections can't be directly rigged. There is no reason in a free and democratic society that Canada is suppose to be that voting cannot be public.

Official parties get tax rebates for expenses... ducks lined up..

In part the reason electronic voting hasn't gone ahead is the exact opposite reason, it can be detected through the machines electronic emissions, meaning peoples votes arn't secret with most voting machines.And tempest systems are cost prohibitive ususally. There is no vote secrecy. Also the systems can be hijacked.

CSIS does security certificates all the time. This involves investigating you, talking to your neighbours etc.. these clearances can be more intensive than getting a firearms license. Also if someone gives a "tip" they may do it. Unfortunately some people both in and out of government arn't nice people and will abuse the reportig process as a weapon against people. I know one person who had links to the Canadian military who didn't like my political philosophy so he harassed and defamed me on an ongoing basis includig reporting my lawful actions to the police, and making up stories about me, this is someone whose buddy was a cop. There are many more like that scum. https://www.csis.gc.ca/nwsrm/bckgrndrs/bckgrndr09-eng.asp BTW some companies do work for the government and employees may not even realize they need clearance for their "civilian jobs" to do their work, and that the government will spy on them to determine their ability to do so. There are many other types of situations, and anyone and everyone can be effected by it, even knowing the wrong person can get you into trouble. Lots of times these stories involve political aids/csis agents unbeknownst to the public. eg. The Government Screening Program provides security assessments for all government departments and institutions, with the exception of the Royal Canadian Mounted Police. The Service also has a site access program for airports, the Parliamentary Precinct and nuclear power stations. For instance your neighbour works for an airport.. guess who shows up at your door asking questions.. 1 in a hundred people work for the military that is potentially 1 in 30 who get a csis agent at their door. There are other examples. The problem arises when CSIS field agents don't inform the person they want to interview the interview is optional, and persist in trying to interview the person or not arranging an interview and just showing up unannounced. It becomes even worse when it is a typical criminal harassment act against the person, as it is an indictable offence and CSIS agents do not have immunity for criminal acts. The same is true for police. If they don't have an arrest warrant, and don't believe an indictable offence is occurring they have no right to interrogate people or even question them without their permission and persisting to do so is unlawful harassment. If repeated then the person could lawfully move to arrest the police officer as it is an idictable offence, and use any means required including lethal force if the officer responds with force or attempts flight. That same CSIS agent would face the same context of commiting an indictable offence in that they would be lawfully a target of arrest by a citizen. That is the law, and the protection against GESTAPO and Police state actions agaist the public. Use it or support a police state that suppresses freedom, we are no better than the terrorist states in the middle east if we support those abuses by the government. Police have no right to breach the peace unlawfully and either does CSIS

I was very surprised to hear that the Conservatives directly violated an Elections Canada directive not to provide polling location information... Election fraud or what... it is really sad Canada doesn't have legal elections anymore .. this is the 3rd election in a row where the conservatives violated the election rules and won. They should be disbanded. It is just plain wrong that a party that repeatedly violates elections law is allowed to run, and claim victory in an election they violated the rules of. http://www.winnipegfreepress.com/canada/elections-canada-told-parties-not-to-call-voters-with-polling-station-locations-141498343.html It is sounding like they gave conservative voters the right location and non conservative supporters the wrong location. Why the hell are elections allowed to be outsourced to the US. First off Canadian taxpayer dollars are paying for the calls, second off the jobs arn't even going to Canadians, they are spending Canadian election dollars on Americans... wtf. Why the hell should americans be telling Canadians where to vote? Now its an international issue... Americans helping the conservatives rig the election... Both the conservatives and the Americans should be locked out of politics in Canada. Why the hell are americans campaigning for Canadian candidates in Canada?

3. Provide interoperable radio capability for law enforcement actors. Next Steps: We will implement a binational radio interoperability system between Canadian and U.S. border enforcement personnel to permit law enforcement agencies to coordinate effective binational investigations and timely responses to border incidents, while improving both officer and public safety. Measuring Progress: The RCMP, Public Safety Canada, the U.S. Department of Justice and the U.S. Department of Homeland Security will fully implement this system within three years and will measure success through technical means such as system availability and user input and surveys. That was 1 year ago, leaving 2 years before "full" implementation nhance the Resiliency of Our Shared Critical and Cyber Infrastructure Execute programs and develop joint products to enhance cross-border critical infrastructure protection and resilience. Next Steps: We will implement the Canada-United States Action Plan for Critical Infrastructure, including by executing programs and developing joint products to enhance cross-border critical infrastructure protection and resilience. As part of this effort, we will conduct a regional resilience assessment program for the Maine-New Brunswick region, and create binational mechanisms for joint risk analysis, which will share information and develop joint analytic products. Measuring Progress: The pilot regional resilience assessment program will be launched in 2011-12 and completed by December 31, 2013. We expect that the binational mechanisms for conducting joint risk analysis will be established by June 30, 2012. Public Safety Canada, the U.S. Department of State and the U.S. Department of Homeland Security will report on implementation, including the number of joint or other products used in developing mitigation plans or addressing a capability gap, and the number of training sessions conducted. Protect vital government and critical digital infrastructure of binational importance, and make cyberspace safer for all our citizens. Next Steps: We will enhance our already strong bilateral cyber-security cooperation to better protect vital government and critical digital infrastructure and increase both countries' ability to respond jointly and effectively to cyber incidents. This will be achieved through joint projects and operational efforts, including joint briefings with the private sector and other stakeholders, and the enhancement of real-time information sharing between operation centres. Measuring Progress: Public Safety Canada, the U.S. Department of State and the U.S. Department of Homeland Security will report on joint or coordinated engagements with the private sector and external stakeholders, including joint briefings and presentations, assistance provided during the course of a cyber incident, and joint communications products that are developed. Expand joint leadership on international cyber-security efforts. Next Steps: We will strengthen cooperation on international cyber-security and Internet governance issues to promote prosperity, enhance security and preserve openness in our networked world. To achieve these goals, we will explore opportunities for improved engagement with third countries and in appropriate multilateral forums. Canada will accede in the coming months to the Council of Europe Convention on Cybercrime, and both countries also will explore opportunities to promote the Convention. Measuring Progress: Public Safety Canada and the U.S. Department of State will report on the effectiveness of sharing cyber-security best practices, the number of engagements with third countries and how these efforts have translated into advancing Canadian-U.S. objectives on cyber issues in international forums. Rapidly Respond to and Recover from Disasters and Emergencies on Either Side of the Border Mitigate the impacts of disruptions on communities and the economy by managing traffic in the event of an emergency at affected border crossings. Next Steps—Land Crossings: We commit to finalizing a guide that outlines best practices and considerations for border traffic management in the event of an emergency to support planning at individual border crossings. Building on this guide, officials will engage regional partners to support the development of regional cross-border plans and conduct exercises to ensure that these plans would be effective in the event of a disruption. Next Steps—Maritime Commerce: We commit to collaborate at the regional level between countries to facilitate maritime commerce recovery following an emergency. This will be achieved by developing joint strategies, processes, or plans to facilitate the sharing of information and resources during emergencies, the dissemination of best practices and the development of clear lines of communication consistent with agreed information elements. Measuring Progress: For land border crossings, Public Safety Canada, the U.S. Department of State and the U.S. Department of Homeland Security will report annually on the percentage of priority border crossings that are covered by a regional plan and validated through an exercise. Public Safety Canada, the Canada Border Services Agency, Transport Canada, the U.S. Department of State and the U.S. Department of Homeland Security will work in the maritime commerce arena to establish or identify and leverage an existing joint Canadian-U.S. Pacific Region committee by January 31, 2012; develop preliminary planning guides, communications and information-sharing protocols by June 30, 2012; conduct a tabletop exercise to validate concepts and mechanisms by October 31, 2012, followed by adjustments to these instruments for use in other regions; report on results of the exercise and finalize a schedule of periodic reviews of concepts and processes in winter 2012-13; and establish or identify and leverage existing joint Canadian-U.S. Atlantic and Great Lakes committees by June 30, 2013, followed by implementation of validated plans and procedures. Enhance our collective preparedness and response capacity for health security threats. Next Steps: We commit to develop a set of measures to reduce the impacts of shared health-security risks. This initiative will be phased in over a period of two years, beginning with information-sharing to explore how each nation determines health security risk and concluding with an appropriate arrangement that records measures for effective cross-border collaboration. We will enhance preparedness and response capacity through a risk-based approach to planning, which will be supported by appropriate information-, personnel- and equipment-sharing arrangements and partnerships. Measuring Progress: Public Safety Canada and the U.S. Department of Homeland Security, in coordination with other health partners, will complete this work by summer 2013. Establish binational plans and capabilities for emergency management, with a focus on chemical, biological, radiological, nuclear and explosives (CBRNE) events. Next Steps: We commit to establishing two new working groups to jointly improve our ability to prepare for and respond to binational disasters. The first working group will focus on preventing, mitigating, preparing for, responding to and recovering from CBRNE events. It will: Establish joint training opportunities and share lessons learned to enhance preparedness for, and response to, CBRNE events in both countries; Establish bilateral information-exchange opportunities to share advancements in policies, plans, science and technology, and lessons learned; Establish a strategy that can enhance bilateral interoperability for conducting CBRNE response; and Develop a mutual-assistance CBRNE concept of operations. The second working group will focus on cross-border interoperability as a means of harmonizing cross-border emergency communications efforts. It will pursue activities that promote the harmonization of the Canadian Multi-Agency Situational Awareness System with the U.S. Integrated Public Alert and Warning System to enable sharing of alert, warning and incident information to improve response coordination during binational disasters. Specifically, this working group will: Coordinate national-level emergency communications plans and strategies; Identify future trends and technologies related to communications interoperability; Promote the use of standards in emergency communications; Promote governance models and structures; and Share best practices and lessons learned. Measuring Progress: Public Safety Canada, the U.S. Department of State and the U.S. Department of Homeland Security will establish the working groups that will develop work plans and validation metrics by October 30, 2012. They will validate their bilateral efforts within a five-year period. Top of page

So if Obama doesn't bluff, then why are more and more forces being deployed to the Straight of Hormuz? http://www.executive-magazine.com/getarticle.php?article=15225 Netanyahu just did a round... for some reason for high level talks with Canada and the President of the US... http://www.haaretz.com/news/diplomacy-defense/netanyahu-tells-obama-i-have-yet-to-decide-whether-to-attack-iran-1.416711 Eve after these talks - Israel, not sure.. It sounds like a strategic game play and tactical positioning right now and that an attack is imminent. I'm just hoping it isn't before the weather has warmed up a bit, last thing Canada needs is a war crisis in winter. the US sent a third aircraft carrier group this month (March) to the Gulf,

I think this is a national issue not a "rest of the world" issue.

So Gaddaffi was ousted by Canadian bombs, and the people left behind.... doing what Gaddaffi didn't... http://www.cbc.ca/ne...ian-graves.html doesn't it feel great to be the minister of defence creating a nation by overthrow of Gaddaffi and puttig people that have no regard for what even Gaddaffi respected. The attrocities and torture happening there all thanks to the minister of defence including these vandalisms. Look at all the good you have done Mr. MacKay. The disconnect seems to still be there.. see the vieled support for the act by the NTC as they referenced religion whe this has to do with vandalized headstones..

So Gaddaffi was ousted by Canadian bombs, and the people left behind.... doing what Gaddaffi didn't... http://www.cbc.ca/news/world/story/2012/03/05/libya-canadian-graves.html doesn't it feel great to be the minister of defence creating a nation by overthrow of Gaddaffi and puttig people that have no regard for what even Gaddaffi respected. The attrocities and torture happening there all thanks to the minister of defence including these vandalisms. Look at all the good you have done Mr. MacKay. The disconnect seems to still be there.. see the vieled support for the act by the NTC as they referenced religion whe this has to do with vandalized headstones..

yeah the game was invented before 1968...

http://ca.news.yahoo.com/surprise-visits-people-legitimate-strategy-spy-agency-100009566.html I'm very disgusted that organizations such as the police and CSIS are creating policies that support criminal harassment. Criminal Harassment IS NOT a legitimate investigative technique. These sorts of activities should require a search warrant or a court order.. even so NO ONE is obligated to talk to police or csis. Communication with CSIS is 100% voluntary, and CRIMINAL HARASSMENT by the agency IS COMPLETELY WRONG, and those agents conducting those illegal acts have no immunity whatsoever, so the agency should not be abetting unlawful conduct. Likewise it is disgusting that police feel criminal harassment is ok because police harassment is part of their job. IT ISN'T This is disgusting. These organizations shoulnd't be infringing peoples rights and harassing them. They are worse than collections agencies that also would be subject to charges for harassment for unwanted interferance. The fact these are damaging situations, is actually a type of defamation. THIS IS SICKENING. http://www.crcvc.ca/docs/crimharass.pdf

http://ca.news.yahoo.com/surprise-visits-people-legitimate-strategy-spy-agency-100009566.html I'm very disgusted that organizations such as the police and CSIS are creating policies that support criminal harassment. Criminal Harassment IS NOT a legitimate investigative technique. These sorts of activities should require a search warrant or a court order.. even so NO ONE is obligated to talk to police or csis. Communication with CSIS is 100% voluntary, and CRIMINAL HARASSMENT by the agency IS COMPLETELY WRONG, and those agents conducting those illegal acts have no immunity whatsoever, so the agency should not be abetting unlawful conduct. Likewise it is disgusting that police feel criminal harassment is ok because police harassment is part of their job. IT ISN'T This is disgusting. These organizations shoulnd't be infringing peoples rights and harassing them. They are worse than collections agencies that also would be subject to charges for harassment for unwanted interferance. The fact these are damaging situations, is actually a type of defamation. THIS IS SICKENING. http://www.crcvc.ca/docs/crimharass.pdf

Help organize the Social Party we will work to ammend the constitution to implement that.