betsy

Please, explain what you mean with your title.

I googled for English because I can't read French. Their romance bloomed on the Hill, with her being a Parliamentary aide. From immigrant background to two-person wedding, Anaida Poilievre a distinct Tory wife “It was the best decision we could have made,” Anaida wrote in a 2019 article for Pretty and Smart Co., the online women’s magazine she co-founded. “We wanted to make sure that our special day was truly just about us and our commitment to each other.” https://nationalpost.com/news/from-immigrant-background-to-two-person-wedding-anaida-poilievre-a-distinct-tory-wife

Though there was a comparison with Trudeau's percentage victory - it was pointed out by a panelist that Trudeau's opponent was not a prominent ex-Premier like Charest.

One thing I can expect - Polievre won't show all his aces! It's too early for that.

Vassy Kapelos and panelists talked about Poilievre's winning last night. Lol - one of the panelists mentioned "majority" in a federal election. "UNPRECEDENTED," was also mentioned, except that it may be the same as Trudeau's when he first won - but, the fact that it happened in the fractuous Conservative Party, is what made the big difference. Looks like he was able to do what Harper did - unite the party! CPAC interview of some Quebec journalists - one lady named Chantal is awed that Poilievre "understands" Quebecers. She said that in his speech, it may not be obvious to some of us, but to Quebeckers, it is. And practically all 4 panelists agree that with Poilievre being a master COMMUNICATOR - the Liberals and the NDP ought to be worried. One even said, "terrified." YES! Looks like Poilievre's family will be very visible. Apparently, he brought his son with him to the first caucus meeting. There must be a lot of new immigrants, and non-whites that he's signed in. Young people interviewed on tv who attended the caucus were so giddy with excitement! They like what they saw and heard. Have you ever wondered why mainstream media never interviewed people of color who are members of the Conservative Party? They don't - and won't - show them to the general public! I saw many during the victory night among the audience! Panelists say there won't be an early election. Singh will make sure of that. ? They say the same thing an article that appeared sometime ago in the National Post (?) that it's the NDP that's bleeding supporters and going to Poilievre. Apparently, majority of new members Poilievre had signed in are young folks! And 95% of those he signed in, voted! They are engaged. I see that many centrist fiscal-conservative folks (who only ended up being Liberals) because for them, there's no other choice to be had........ could also easily end up going to Poilievre.

@Michael Hardner I articulated it poorly. I was referring specifically about the intro speech by his wife. That's why I posted that particular video clip in my OP! That's my issue. (Let me fix that). Has that been done by anyone in our political history? The wife introducing her husband? Her message impacts IMMIGRANTS! And the background of Poilievre himself! What a revelation! Have you guys known about that? Until that night, I never knew Poilievre has a Venezuelan wife. For someone who's being defined as a "white supremacist" - that is a significant fact to know!

Define "distance.' Why should he distance himself with the Freedom Convoy? Not everyone is racist in that protest! Only a handful are. No one can control big crowds from being infiltrated! If Harper had done it in GTA...........all the more reason why PP could more likely do it again! Don't forget the climate during Harper's victory - the climate of ANGER OVER LIBERALS' corruption! Canadians are even more angry today, though for many different reasons.

They have conservative strategists too on most of their panels. But that doesn't stop the anchor from asserting her liberal views, or to make leading statements/questions when interviewing a guest. Rosemary Barton was incredibly rude with her panel while covering the CPC Convention , including to her co-host Vassy Kapelos, whom she practically ignored all night. Barton would dismiss an explanation by a panelist (in a seemingly petulant tone). Kapelos appeared to be non-partisan in her views, and Barton seemed to resent it. Yes, I'm hopeful. But my hopes - my predictions - aren't without any sensible reason to be hopeful for. As explained, I have something to base my predictions on.

If UNITY is so damned important, according to Trudeau and his people - then what the heck was Dominic LeBlanc doing in the Conservative Leadership convention maligning the predicted-to-be-proclaimed leader. Why can't Leblanc be GRACIOUS enough and let conservative Canadians have their own moment in their own convention? If you got nothing nice to say - why say something OFFENSIVE and DIVISIVE? Go back to your tribe!

If Leslyn Lewis is not enough evidence to show that the Conservative Party is not a hotbed of white supremacists................................ then Anaido Galindo Poilievre, had surely busted that myth. I wonder if Galindo-Poilievre had been with her husband as he campaigned all over the country. If so, I wonder how many non-whites and immigrants among that huge percentage of new members have signed up with him - because of her? Poilievre should have his wife do the same introduction at every campaign event! It's important for people to see that there's nothing to fear! I didn't even know until that night Poilievre is married to a Venezuelan. Do you? Somehow, media never mentioned that. Why would they? They won't mention it. So CPC - SHOW CANADIANS! Poilevre has a very sensible and practical policy for immigrants to cut the red tape, and let them work in their profession. We need doctors! Nurses! Care-givers! Etc. If we are opening our doors to immigrants for economic purposes, then let's do that! Indeed, I hope to see Polievre putting Leslyn Lewis and Roman Baber in high profile positions in his team. Concentrate on Quebec and GTA! And other places with large numbers of immigrants.

........................................ will be through the GTA, and Quebec! Immigrants and non-whites will carry him like a banner to victory! There! I said it. He'll succeed where others had failed. Unless I missed it, news media hadn't been showing clips from the Conservative race in which Poilievre had won by 68% - a record-breaking number, according to pundits - nor even mentioned the biggest surprise that has been seen for the first time in Canadian politics - or, perhaps, the media just overlooked this due to their distraction over a historic event that they cover daily - that they didn't show another HISTORIC MOMENT! The introduction of the wife of Polievre who hails from VENEZUELA! When did we ever seen that happen in Canadian politics - especially in the Conservative Party of Canada? I don't know if it was panned in any political talk show yesterday. The introduction speech by Polievre's wife, Anaida Galindo. Poilievre is being subtly linked with White Supremacists by some lying fake news people (citing his association with the Freedom Convoy). I suppose that was one way they were planning to do their character assassination of this guy - defining him as "in bed with white supremacists," and therefore someone to be wary of. That warning is of course, indirectly being given to all people of color and immigrants. That's how the Conservatives has been demonized. Remember what they alluded about Stephen Harper. Perhaps, that's one big reason why the Conservatives could never take the GTA, though not for lack of trying! It's not about the economy or housing market for this block which is comprised of many immigrants. Because majority of immigrants came from religious background - therefore many of them tend to have conservative or right-leaning values. They shun the Conservatives out of fear, of having a racist leader. They're (immigrants) tend to be more trusting of and gullible to the lying media. But times has changed - and so are the views towards media (thanks to Trump for that). We can smell a spin and a lie a hundred miles away! Lol - even celebs are so eerily quiet these days - the mouthy ones - like Baldwin (the sour faced one), de Niro and Streep! ? We see a few posts here already............ regurgitating BLINDLY, what the lying scumbag media suggests - alluding to Hitler! Lol - a little head-shake there for the ignorant - who put all the mandates so far? And who was strutting like Hitler? As for racism - who got caught parroting a black face?

Which Conservative leader hadn't tried to reach out to all? Poilievre will do the same - although I don't see him buying votes, or pivoting from his policies or stance. Dirty politics has always been around us. Remember "boots on the ground" campaign against Harper? The biggest threat to Poilievre will come from the leftist media - especially from the tax-payer-funded-leftist-propaganda-media. That's always been the case. The media will HEAVILY come after him - character assassination - when campaign for election starts. Despite this threat - I see Poilievre winning a LANDSLIDE in the next federal election (provided there are no scandals or anything the media can use, that would erupt between now and then).

Poilievre is going to be our next Prime Minister.

Yes. And, I wonder why no one from the community had tipped the cops if they know he was a wanted man for three months prior to this rampage. One of the victim's relatives is trying to connect this to residential schools! Baloney!

It is meant for both - men and women. Genesis 2:24 Therefore a man shall leave his father and his mother and hold fast to his wife, and they shall become one flesh. 1 Cor 7: 1-40 Now concerning the matters about which you wrote: “It is good for a man not to have sexual relations with a woman.” But because of the temptation to sexual immorality, each man should have his own wife and each woman her own husband. The husband should give to his wife her conjugal rights, and likewise the wife to her husband. For the wife does not have authority over her own body, but the husband does. Likewise the husband does not have authority over his own body, but the wife does. Do not deprive one another, except perhaps by agreement for a limited time, that you may devote yourselves to prayer; but then come together again, so that Satan may not tempt you because of your lack of self-control. ... Why is virginity so important in the Bible? https://www.gotquestions.org/Bible-virginity.html

Lol - ? - the irony! You should read. That's what happens when some responses are either ignored or skipped over. You end up giving your opinion blatantly based on sheer ignorance.

Lesbianism is under homosexuality in the Bible, just as much as lesbian marriage goes under GAY marriage in our society today. I don't know if those things are more important or in the same footing as other fornications that have not been mentioned in the Bible. I don't think the Bible had mentioned many kinds of depravities specifically - like, gang-banging, or necrophilia. Are they then less important? No. If God had emphasized the creation of genders, and why He had created those genders - which was also repeated by Christ - that's all that's needed to get the message across: the only sexual act acceptable to God would be that between a male and a female within the bounds of marriage. That's what the creation of GENDERS for mankind, is for! Marital union of a male and female. As I've explained, depravties and unnatural sexual acts all fall under the terms "sexual immorality, " or "fornications." And, those terms are all over the Scriptures. Old and New. Jude 1: 7 Just as Sodom and Gomorrah and the surrounding cities, which likewise indulged in sexual immorality and pursued unnatural desire, serve as an example by undergoing a punishment of eternal fire. 2 Corinthians 12"21 I fear that when I come again my God may humble me before you, and I may have to mourn over many of those who sinned earlier and have not repented of the impurity, sexual immorality, and sensuality that they have practiced. Hebrews 13:4 Let marriage be held in honor among all, and let the marriage bed be undefiled, for God will judge the sexually immoral and adulterous.

Support for Ukraine is getting soft in Germany, says CTV. They can't hack the gas prices! WHO PUT THEM IN THAT PATHETIC SITUATION? Their freakin own government!

I just explained to you why! Do we sacrifice animals? Here is another explanation: In His conversation with the woman (John 4:20-26), Jesus clearly signals that some activities involved in the worship of God would change despite having been required practice since at least the time of the building of the Temple by Solomon, a period of about a thousand years. Also within the context is Jesus' hint that the nature of worship would be changing from rote public ceremonies to more heartfelt devotion and personal interaction with God. https://www.bibletools.org/index.cfm/fuseaction/Topical.show/RTD/CGG/ID/15183/Worshiping-God-Anywhere.htm John 4 21 Jesus said to her, “Woman, believe Me, the hour is coming when you will neither on this mountain, nor in Jerusalem, worship the Father. 22 You worship what you do not know; we know what we worship, for salvation is of the Jews. 23 But the hour is coming, and now is, when the true worshipers will worship the Father in spirit and truth; for the Father is seeking such to worship Him. 24 God is Spirit, and those who worship Him must worship in spirit and truth.”

I'm not saying the 10 Commandments doesn't matter. I gave you the explanation. There are some rules that strictly apply only to Jews - like, circumcision as an example.....because Israel was supposed to be a nation of priests. Why do you say that? As a matter of fact - we don't even have to go to a church or a temple to worship!

Christians are not required to strictly observe Sabbath day on Saturdays.....or even Sundays. Any day can be a Holy day to a Christian. The Word of God makes it quite clear that Sabbath observance was a special sign between God and Israel: “The Israelites are to observe the Sabbath, celebrating it for the generations to come as a lasting covenant. It will be a sign between me and the Israelites forever, for in six days the Lord made the heavens and the earth, and on the seventh day he abstained from work and rested” (Exodus 31:16–17). Looking more closely at point 4 above will reveal that there is no obligation for the New Testament believer to keep the Sabbath, and will also show that the idea of a Sunday “Christian Sabbath” is also unscriptural. As discussed above, there is one time the Sabbath is mentioned after Paul began to focus on the Gentiles, “Therefore do not let anyone judge you by what you eat or drink, or with regard to a religious festival, a New Moon celebration or a Sabbath day. These are a shadow of the things that were to come; the reality, however, is found in Christ” (Colossians 2:16–17). The Jewish Sabbath was abolished at the cross where Christ “canceled the written code, with its regulations” (Colossians 2:14). https://www.gotquestions.org/Saturday-Sunday.html

Conservatives are gaining popularity in Quebec on this provincial election. https://tnc.news/2022/07/30/quebec-conservatives/ Could this mean Federal Conservatives will also benefit?

Even if something is only mentioned one time, it doesn't make it any less. It is written. Anyway, gay sex isn't written only once. Lesbianism falls under homosexuality (in the Bible - as shown).....much the same way that lesbian marriage also falls under GAY MARRIAGE in our vocabulary today, doesn't it? When you speak of gay marriage - that doesn't include marriage between lesbians? Yes or no. There are many verses about punishments (various books throughout the Bible). Here are examples: Rev 21:8 But as for the cowardly, the faithless, the detestable, as for murderers, the sexually immoral, sorcerers, idolaters, and all liars, their portion will be in the lake that burns with fire and sulfur, which is the second death.” Hebrews 13:4 Let marriage be held in honor among all, and let the marriage bed be undefiled, for God will judge the sexually immoral and adulterous. Jude 1:7 Just as Sodom and Gomorrah and the surrounding cities, which likewise indulged in sexual immorality and pursued unnatural desire, serve as an example by undergoing a punishment of eternal fire. They all fall under "fornicators," or "sexually immoral." Which include those who have sex outside of marriage, and promiscuity. The only sexual acts acceptable to God are those between a husband and his wife (marital union between a male and female). 1 Cor 7:2 But because of the temptation to sexual immorality, each man should have his own wife and each woman her own husband.

For how long had Ukraine begged for long-ranged missiles, and what was the excuse of USA for not giving it? EITHER YOU'RE AT WAR, or YOU'RE NOT! Lol - if Russia declared war on you.....you're at war, even if you don't want to. You can either fight it...................or, take it lying down. What's the point of throwing all this aid on Ukraine if the goal isn't to end the war?

Do you have any idea at all why I said........................"alleged war?" Have you read this part in the OP? On one hand we're giving out BILLIONS to Ukraine to fight off Russia, and yet on the other hand - we are also giving in to Russia - because of Germany......... ....................................at a time when Canadians are hurting! Boy, we can't even fix our own crumbling healthcare system! What kind of war are we into? Can someone please explain this to me because I can't see why on earth are we into this........................ if, we are not really into it! Don't even mention WW2. Churchill would never have made such childish decisions like this. EITHER YOU'RE AT WAR, or YOU'RE NOT! F**K! Germany can't even sacrifice some discomfort which is due to their own stupidity - and here we are, wanting Germany to not have any discomfort, so we call a time-out to our sanction on Russia! Lol - don't you see they're showing their weakness(es)? ALL THE ENEMIES ARE WATCHING THIS and TAKING STOCK!