PolyNewbie

Its funny that people can be in favour of something that they know absolutely nothing about. I think this is where the word "idiot" comes into play. If it was any good for the people they would be bragging about it and using it to fish for votes. Its a corporate takeover, not a joining of the countries. Thats why the controlled media will not mention it.

Its main stream history. You have to read to know this. Many sources will tell you this. Lots of people believe it.

That is the banker agenda now as it was then. Hitlers party was broke. Brown Brothers Harriman (Prescott Bush) saved the NAZI party and continued to help them up until 1942 when it got into the NY Times and they were arrested but very soon after let go. Bankers even financed the Russian revolution. There are many parallels that exist between George Bush police state and the NAZI's in terms of laws written. Their is an interview with a few different law professors on various dates on the infowars site that explain this. Russia & Iran are resisting the New World Order. Iraq was too powerful and nationalist government: it had to be destroyed.

Its to put globalists in charge of the food supply so that they can more effectively run things and create food shortages if the need should arise to control a woken up population from rebelling against the banks & financial oligarchy - same reason they want cameras everywhere and to have the police hold people for no reason.

I think that North Korea and Iran want or have nukes to protect them from the United States - not to attempt to take over the world. ROTFLMAO What about George Bush ?The USA on the other hand is trying to take over the world. We know this because they admit it in government papers like "The Plan For The New American Century". The Americans are a banker puppet state and have been squashing and subjugating small countries for the bankers for a while now. John Perkins Confessions Of An Economic Hit Man explains this.

So if you had a hot piece of steel that was being heated by a fuel fire the temperature of the steel would exceed that of the burning fuel if it was in an enclosed space ? Fuel doen't burn hot enough to melt steel. I think they could (1) know exactly where the planes would hit if they were programmed and flown automatically (2) They could change the initiation point of the collapse if necessary quite easily and allow for different impact points.

No one is really argueing that planes didn't hit the towers or the Pentagon. It's pointless to consider - it doesn't matter if people think a plane hit the Pentagon or not. Physical evidence of the twin towers shows the official explanation to be impossible. There is physical evidence of demolition as well as many witnesses describing explosions. The explosions start before the tower begins to collapse. How do you explain the molten metal and the hot spots at the towers ? You have a very simple and convenient way to look at the world that shows you to be very simple minded. The whole "us or them" mentality is a simple one. Reality is never this simple.

The best idea I ever heard was a micro tax on stock market transactions. I don't know much about the economy, my interest is the history of banking although I am learning good economic theory from the best people for it (not the UNESCO education system). I have heard that if we tax the stock market transactions that this would dampen activity and take a lot of speculative capital out of the markets. We would therefore get a more realistic view of the economy through looking at the stock market and people would be inclined to invest in actual useful productivity. The tax would be so low as to be unnoticeable for those who buy derivatives as insurance. The amount of money comming in would reduce the need for much taxation. Has anyone ever shown that this would be a bad idea ?

I don't think you know much about anything - arrogant people seldom do. I think the people behind COMER have a lot more experience and a lot more education than you do. I also think the cartoon is all based on fact. It doesn't say that. No one would suggest that. COMER doesn't support that so I think you are misreading things. COMER doesn't have a policy but I've never heard anyone arguing that. I think the cartoon is just illustrating that inflation can be dealt with or controlled. They can - especially since de regulation.

One does not have to get into the complexities of every last detail of all this to understand it. John Kenneth galbraith doesn't share your opinion, neither do many others. They claim it is a relatively simple system at the top level. I don't know what Galbraith and the rest are talking about with this electronic money. Its a term that gets used often enough. Economists talk about electronic money and the affect it has had on the economy. Obviously you know more because you have said so. Perhaps these guys are all delusional 8-) Do you mail the cash or like to go down to the bank personally ? I send a cheque myself.

I think the batterys are already here and have been for some time. I watched a movie on this and there was a couple - married scientists who came up with a battery.

Actually geoffrey, not only are you very inexperienced and very much less qualified than the people you so arrogantly criticise but you do not even understand why an organization such as COMER even exists.

You have absolutely no where near the qualifications or experience of the people behind that cartoon. I don't care if you have a Phd and you are working as a prof in some university. Although I know that not to be the case from your arrogance.

No I don't. Medical issues are always wide ranging and have ethical issues. Without big pharma control of medacine and the doctors taking the hypocratic oath we would be safe from bad medacine. It would not be difficult to determine if an engineer or accountant was behaving unethically - in fact its easily proven compared to medacine. Lawyers should not have self governance simply from my experience and some obvious facts about the law society that makes it bad for the public & great for lawyers. It would be difficult for the public to determine wrong doing but this is preferable to the situation now where no one even tries (no investigations are done) by the law society. So you agree with all my other points ?

We should have electric cars. Better torque, better environment. Quieter. Last longer. Simpler.

Here are some characteristics of what I would consider an ideal system. This sytem couldn't be implemented practically but I think this is what an ideal system would look like IMO (1) All elected representatives required to read legislature before voting on it (2) Nationalization of both petroleum & other natural resources as well as the banks (3) Regional education governance bodies and cirriculum designers (4) Public supervision of professionals, lawyers & cops as well as others except in the case of medical (5) Re Instated borders and the elimination of free trade (6) Floride in water made illegal (7) Doctors required to take Hyppocratic Oath (8) Politicians can only run in ridings where they live (9) Manually counted voting system (10) 100 % Public funding of election campains based on signatures. More public debating. (11) Elected officials have no memberships in secret societies (12) Free education for anyone (13) Proportional income taxes when income tax is necessary (14) Military strong but used to guard national borders not used for imperial conquest. We have everything we need and then some already. I do not think corporate governance needs to be addressed. In the above system monetary reform would ensure responsible governance of corps. It would eliminate the need for income tax and extend lifespans as well as life quality. There would be fewer illegal drugs and a more creative, informed and interactive society. We would get there fast if we got monetary reform.

sex parties, devil worship, anything goes with these legal types. Believe me - they could be into anything under the sun.

See the Canadian Action Party website. I can't find the link but the figure is 28 %. Its the largest single expenditure from income tax funds. I don't think citizens should have to provide private individuals with investment opportunities in order to have sidewalks and schools.

Electronic money is money that gets used in transactions and never gets converted to cash. An example of electronic money is the use of a bank card or credit card for a purchase. The term is used throughout economic literature and books in print today.

I think the USA/international bankers is the biggest nuclear threat of today since they have stated that they will use nuclear weapons and they have used nuclear weapons in the past. They have no reason to invade Iran and Iran has a very reasonable desire to own nuclear weapons in a world populated with international banker puppet states like Israel and the USA.

Ted Pike / Rense Rev Ted Pike has been the leading activist against the new hate bill which would expand police powers in operating against free speech. Ted Pike has done numerous MP3 interviews all over the web. He is best interviewed by Jeff Rense but you have to pay ten bucks a month for access on Rense.com. Well worth it because Rense is the best interviewer IMO.

Not enough tables for everyone. Time is better spent studying than serving coffee. Those jobs should be reserved for people who like doing it (and many do) and those who don't want to go to school.

Link ? What book ? I didn't know Harper had a published bio. I will definetly read this. (know thy enemy) Rockefeller admits he is out to destroy the USA in his bio. I wonder what Harper will admit to.

You can go the the Canadian Action Paqrty website and learn about the banks in Canada. They explain this in a little cartoon on the right hand side of the page. See Should Canada adopt the US Buck

re my remark on "who prints the money". My remark is more of an expression than something that can be taken literally. Most of this money that I talk about is actually electronic money. In Cnada the government prints the "cash". I am refering to the banking powers.