PolyNewbie

Guess which countries do not yet have their system dominated by the small group of private bank owners in the world: Iran, Cuba, Sudan, North Korea, Libya Make your guess from that because that is why we fight - to bring our private banks to other countries.

You ask way too much from this crowd. They are mostly just government apologists that have no idea what they are talking about on almost all matters.

I make certain assumptions about lawyers when I see them the way certain lawyers make assumptrions about members of the public, ie we are "specks", etc. I think its the only response available to the public to counter the corruption and arrogance within the law society. Members of the public need to start showing lawyers the same degree of respect that we receive. Then maybe lawyers can learn to clean up their act on a grass roots level. The Law Society Of Upper Canada doesn't have the staff to deal with lawyer corruption. They admitted that to me on the phone.

I think you probably do have illusions of grandiose. I have seen this before and the lawyer got their pants beat off by me before we even saw the inside of a court room. I haven't yet met an "intelligent" lawyer - if "intelligent" means ability to win an arguement.

Which is not at all similar to saying Israel should be wiped off the map. The USA I think is the greatest country in the world, however, I would like it if the Bush adminsitration wsn't around. Does this mean I want to destroy the USA ?

The book Confessions Of An Economic Hit Man by John Perkins explains it all.

As we speak USA is getting ready to attack Iran. What did Iran ever do to the USA ? Or Israel for that matter ? The truth is that they do not have our private banking system and thats what the bankers are after and thats why we will go to war. Same as all the other wars. The IMF will finance a reconstruction after Iran is destroyed through corrupt US officials. Iran will be hopelessly in debt to the IMF and will only get funding if they agree to USA / IMF terms. Corrupt governments will be put into place to allow the western banks to take over their money supply.

You probably do have grandiose illusions. I know other lawyers certainly do.

Yes, but the real legal interpretation of it depends on who you are talking to. The definition in a court can be changed to fit the case. I wouldn't read through all that stuff. Its written to be complex and misleading like most legal documentation - its much more complex than it needs to be.

The law profession has gone corrupt because no one can hold them responsible for their actions. They have absolute power and absolute power does corrupt.

It wouldn't surprise me, if he was, what would anyone do about it ? Who could report it ? How would the law society even have time to investigate ? - which one of their other valid cases would they have to throw out to deal with this ? Maybe I said that too strongly - he may be, he may not be. The fact that he is a lawyer says that he is probably corrupt because so many lawyers are corrupt - not all, but its a safe assumption in my experience. I've already dealt with too many lawyers to be able to change persectives.

This is a lie. He was quoting someone else and did not say the Israel should be wiped off the map. See Global Research for details and literal translation of what he did say. STOP WATCHING TV AND READING CONTROLLED MEDIAS !!!!

No. I mean "crown priviledge". It was in the paper a few weeks ago about some lawyer that was going to weasel his way out of trouble by invoking "crown privelidge" to avoid answering questions regarding criminal behaviour.

I don't think anything can be proven from those events because of what we do not know about them. We know enough about the NY collapses to prove it was an inside job. That proof is that they collapsed straight down at near freefall speed and that the (melted steel shown on video) heat involved shows that something other than jet fuel was involved in the collapse. I think flight 93 was shot down because Rumsfeld accidentally said so and from the evidence - lack of large airplane parts & no bodies. The guy from Popular Mechanics was saying that they found all the bodies underground after the crash in a debate with Dylan Avery on Democracy Now. Hmmm. Its hard to know anything for sure but a hundred bodies just don't bury themselves and airplanes don't bury themselves in the ground in accidents either.

Robert Gaylon Ross, an ex high level agent for the US investigates the banks. He says the Rothschilds are worth $300 trillion and Rockefeller is worth $12 trillion. A Russian economist estimated the Rothschilds net worth at $700 trillion. Banking is very secretive - at least if you believe ex presidents, ex bankers, etc in what they say about the banks. You have yet to show how the quotes I have given could be mis interpreted or taken out of context. Explain how this quote could be taken out of context: ""You (International Bankers) are a den of vipers and thieves. I intend to rout you out, and by the Eternal God, I will rout you out. If the American people only understood the rank injustice of our money and banking system, there would be a revolution before morning." - Andrew Jackson " or this one: "These International Bankers and Rockefeller Standard Oil interests control the majority of newspapers and the columns of these papers to club into submission or drive out of public office officials who refuse to do the bidding of the powerful corrupt cliques which compose the invisible government." -Theodore Roosevelt

How ? (I think this is logically impossible)

Thats not it.

What is "crown privilidge" ? Does anyone know ?

There are over 20,000 lawyers practising in Ontario. There are 8 lawyers that supervise them for ethics. The rest of us have at least 20 - 40 cops for 20,000 people. I also know that when people file personal injury suits against corporations or doctors and they have a case their lawyer will do everything unethical that is possible to prevent the case from getting into courts. There have been cases when a semi detached trailer (one or more) have been sent to opposing council with the idea that by the time the opposing council digs through the papers to find what he requested his client is broke. This is the legal system we have. There is nothing noble, honorable or distinguished about it. Its just a bunch of weasels robbing everyone. Mainstream press has talked about money laundering by lawyers many times. How many have been arrested ? You can look at Law Society Of Upper Canada statistics. They only investigate a small percentage of complaints - about 1 %. My own experience in which I have named names, dates and places and have been asked by mod not to do this. I think lawyers should be treated the same way they treat the public. The fact is that I automatically assume any lawyer that I meet to be a lying manipulative gutless little money grubbing weasel until they prove otherwise.

If Harper sucessfully muzzles judges they may be able to get a terrorism charge to stick. Most of those caeses get thrown out for having no evidence. Harper wants more Zundel trials because he is a neocon.

I don't believe that based on what the law society lets lawyers get away with and the fact that the law society destroys records of reported wrong doing by lawyers. This way when someone calls the law society to ask about a lawyer they can say "we have nothing on record" when in reality the guy may have fleeced a pile of clients only a few years prior and the records have just been destroyed.

The above Truman quote explains my position on these matters. I don't know where the above quote came from. I suspect people are having reading comprehension problems with my post.

"Once a government is committed to the principle of silencing the voice of opposition, it has only one way to go, and that is down the path of increasingly repressive measures, until it becomes a source of terror to all its citizens and creates a country where everyone lives in fear." - President Harry S. Truman.

I just assume lawyers are corrupt because of my experience. So when I see a lawyer I automatically assume that they are criminals based on what the law society is prepared to do about criminal behaviour by lawyers. I know they sanction criminal behaviour of their colleagues. If you have a problem with that then its up to you to do something about it. I didn't accuse anyone of anything. I just said that because of the profession he is in he could be doing it because he could certainly get away with it. Who would be able to report it ? (re contacting Law Society)I would never call the law society on a corrupt lawyer. They are just there to protect lawyers from the public. They knowingly allow lawyers to commit crimes. The fact that you cannot report lawyers for commiting crimes - you cannot even file a report !!!! So they can do whatever they want. Given that I safely assume lawyers are criminals because they are allowed to be if they want to be. Its perfectly fair. You have a secret organization that self governs lawyers. You deserve to be judged by the actions of youtr colleagues. I judge all lawyers by the actions of their colleagues.

Do you actually know anything about this ? I'm not saying I do but I am a little sick of hearing from self proclaimed experts.