sharkman

The FBI? They’ve had it for probably two years, and they investigated it alright, just as they did with items seized from Epstein’s US homes.

You are missing the point. This thread is claiming the Russian army collapsed last September. All I am saying is they haven’t collapsed, and their recent attack on Ukraine demonstrates this. Edit, and I’m not cheering them on. I. Am. Simply. Stating. They haven’t collapsed.

Don’t mind if I do. They’ll be begging for Trump by 2024, Harris will be an even bigger disaster than What’s left of Biden’s brain.

Whatever, get back to me when the Russian army actually collapses.

You haven’t heard? Start here, Ukraine already responded with a missile attack, I guess they knew something you didn’t. https://amp.theguardian.com/world/live/2023/jan/04/russia-ukraine-war-live-moscow-revises-makiivka-death-toll-to-89-zelenskiy-reiterates-warning-of-new-russian-offensive

Remember, the most heavily defended airspace in the world. Let them fly around for an hour. An hour. Before intercepting them. I’m surprised that sounds plausible to you. Not one, but three massive buildings fell to the ground so smoothly, and it looked exactly. Exactly like demolition. Why they did it may never be known, but it probably has to do with money. What kind of plan is the following to you, some kind of evil genius? There is no way they succeeded without some form of help. On September 11, 2001, 19 men armed with box cutters, directed by a man on dialysis in a cave fortress half way around the world using a satellite phone and a laptop, successfully conducted a sophisticated penetration of the most heavy defended airspace in the world. Overpowering passengers and combat trained pilots, the planes were flown wildly off course for over an hour and no attempts to intercept them were made. The towers collapsed in on themselves, exactly the same way buildings do when they are brought down on purpose. Sounds plausible to me.

Speaking of Russian missile attacks, how about their latest offensive, eh? Quite the feat, being that the Russian army collapsed long ago(according to you), eh?

Now that Republicans are in control of Congress, it’s time to finally investigate what’s on Hunter’s old laptop. If they do, and it’s taken seriously, it might be enough to get Biden impeached, and see President Harris emerge.

I’ll blame them. Was he vaccinated and how many times. Many sports people under 40 are dying when they didn’t use to in these numbers, and there must be a reason…

https://original.newsbreak.com/@ty-d-1600407/2877093456466-mass-closures-of-macy-s-stores-125-stores-closing-what-should-you-expect Macy’s has announced that it plans to close a fifth of its stores this year.

You never can tell when you might check out. We took a 5 hour drive to family for Christmas. My brother in law recently did some business with a customer and the guy passed away a few days later. The word is that Damar is not breathing on his own. The hit he was involved with didn't seem that unusual.

This just in, a new story in the WSJ is suggesting that the more vaxxed you are, the more you are at risk for catching Covid. https://www.wsj.com/articles/are-vaccines-fueling-new-covid-variants-xbb-northeast-antibodies-mutation-strain-immune-imprinting-11672483618?mod=djemalertNEWS Growing evidence also suggests that repeated vaccinations may make people more susceptible to XBB and could be fueling the virus’s rapid evolution. I’ve heard that some people have racked up 5 vaccines.

I’m not sure, are they all known? I’m sure they all breathed a sigh of relief when Epstein conveniently killed himself. Funny how all the cameras turned off for the critical event, eh? Edit: Here’s a shocker. On Dec 27, the Attorney General for Virgin Islands filed a lawsuit in Manhattan. It names JP Morgan Chase as having turned a blind eye to Epstein’s sex trafficking. That same day Joe Biden landed in the Virgin Islands. Today that Attorney General was fired. I’m sure it was all just a coincidence.

Flat wrong. First, I did not define what size jet, but here’s the proof that the WTC towers were designed to within a jet impact. That means jet impact. Not fire. I thought I better explain that to you. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Collapse_of_the_World_Trade_Center During their investigation into the collapse, the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) obtained a three-page white paper that stated the buildings would survive an aircraft-impact of a Boeing 707 or DC 8 flying at 600 mph (970 km/h).

These are weak responses. You seem unable to think critically. Second, I clearly was not suggesting that they be shot down. I said intercept them, don’t you know what that means? Follow them in a military jet, track them, observe and report what they are doing. None of this was done for any of the airliners.. Not one. Why was that? And don’t try to answer that question, because you don’t know why. They scramble jets for threats all the time. Those towers were specifically built to withstand jet impacts, so they’re ALWAYS known such a thing is possible. But they didn’t scramble any jets. Those airliners could have been flown into the White House and nothing would have stopped them. They could have shot down the airliner that flew into the Pentagon, before it struck, but no jets were scrambled. Such a thing, not scrambling jets. After the first airliner hit the south Tower, they knew that the airliner targets were civilian, and possibly more buildings. But they still didn’t scramble jets. They let them continue. Why is that? (You don’t have the answer). Perhaps the answer is blowing in the wind.

And the reason the hijacked planes flew around restricted airspace for an hour without being intercepted by military jets(not shot down, but simply intercepted)? And the reason the towers collapsed with demolition precision? And the reason building 7 collapsed with demolition precision when it hadn’t been struck(many other nearby buildings were more seriously damaged than building 7, yet they never collapsed)? And the reason… look. All you’ve got is what you’ve been given by a media that had the Osama narrative within a few minutes of the first Tower impact. Believe what makes you happy.

On September 11, 2001, 19 men armed with box cutters, directed by a man on dialysis in a cave fortress half way around the world using a satellite phone and a laptop, successfully conducted a sophisticated penetration of the most heavy defended airspace in the world. Overpowering passengers and combat trained pilots, the planes were flown wildly off course for over an hour and no attempts to intercept them were made. The towers collapsed in on themselves, exactly the same way buildings do when they are brought down on purpose. Sounds plausible to me.

If you are curious, I agree with most of the video contents. Edit: I’ll add a link to another video that I believe discusses exactly how they rigged the buildings to collapse with the precision you saw. https://rumble.com/v1jrzga-igp10-127-loose-change-911-fifth-edition-sound-remastered.html

Yes, I know all that. That’s the official story. I defended it for well over a decade on this very forum before you came around.

Then you should probably just believe whatever you think best…

The crater was a naturally occurring crack in the earth that was captured by a geological survey satellite photo taken in 1994. The Pentagon was not hit by an aircraft. The missile, captured on security cam footage, was responsible. It was not an airliner as the official story claimed.

Oddly enough, most of your questions are good ones. Many others have had similar questions. They searched, interviewed people off the record, dug and compiled documents. Some of them had classified clearances, and had access to security camera footage before it was destroyed. Some of your issues are addressed in the video. I used to believe exactly as you do, and for many years defended Bush, the official story and the strange decision to attack Iraq.

Only one was caught on camera. The pentagon was hit with a missile, footage is in the video. The crash site in Pennsylvania, where the plane crashed in the ground? That crater existed there as early as 1994. Also, not one shred of 747 jet rubble was ever visible at the site. Its all in that video which you refrain from even watching because it makes you uncomfortable with the implications. All I’m saying is, there is much evidence to show that parts of the official story are questionable. Bush screwed up, it’s all in the video.

There is enough evidence that something other than the official story occurred, at least for me. https://rumble.com/vb1zkn-91118-red-pill-the-build-up-to-911.html

5 times…suddenly I feel bad for you bro.