Leafless

When you start hearing about immigration quotas or head taxes on whites, or see white people rounded up and herded into reservations, you might have a point about "reverse discrimination." But you won't and you don't. Say RACIAL PROFILING! With a straight face. Or see people rounded up and herded into reservations, immigration quotas, head taxes on Whites! What unadulterated BS. Aboriginals are free to live anywhere in Canada if they choose.

No one promised you any social privileges because there are already an abundance of social privileges that were simply there for the taking. You just don't appreciate what Canada has to offer that you automatically gain in the way of social privileges living in Canada. All the hard work as already been taken care of by the people who founded this country initially and built up to what it is to-day, prior to the Charter. What we are talking about primarily, is the failure of marriage due to an unmanageable set of societal circumstances that the federal government choose to stay out of, which is one of the main reasons regarding the failure, pertaining to a lasting marriage.

First, why, in the title of the thread here, do you assume that blame should be involved? Second, is traditional marriage really failing? People keep getting married, as far as I can tell. Do you and BD work the same shift? Yep, people are getting married and according to your logic this makes marriage successful. Brilliant!

Are WASP the only group in Canada capable of trying to maintain a certain identity? What about Aboriginals and Quebecers? Or Blacks that continually play out reverse discrimination the same type of crap they accuse the White guys of doing. It seems the only group that does not have an identity, are White Catholics, who are forced to take a back seat and pay the bills for all other dominating groups. Talk about calling the kettle black!

How else do you explain Ghostrider being number one at the box office for two weeks. My wife tells me it's because of Nicholas Cage.

For what real purpose? Canada will always be knocked regardless as a fossil fuel hog in the way of GHG due to it's tiny population.

Good one! Ha-ha-ha-ha.

Before you can even make that statement, do you have proof or whatever, if in fact Alberta gasoline is being used anywhere in Canada to begin with?

Sounds like you never dated either. This is when machismo is most predominant. But when your single machismo mysteriously disappears and is replaced with common sense.

The Christian values Iam talking about, are basically these along with the 'Ten Commandments'. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Christian_values Off course there are other faiths that helped bulid Canada, but the fact remains Canada is primarily, a Christian society. This is basically 'off topic' and there are other threads you can refer to on that subject or open you own topic on the subject.

Feminist demand to be treated as an equal and even some go as far protecting their rights incorporating a marriage contract. This all sounds reasonable since in most cases both must work. This is until a couple in this situation finds that running a household is a real chore and that either or both no longer wish to assume this common responsibility. So possibly the males role becomes a female role or the females role becomes a males role. Many males or females in my estimation cannot tolerate this role sharing and the relationship sometimes goes down the tubes because of it, especially when children are involved, adds to the burden. Iam just basically suggesting what sometimes could happen when both parties have to work (and demanding to be treated equal at the same time) while trying to treat marriage in a more conventional way.

Man, anybody who makes a dumb statement like you have, doesn't deserve to be Canadian. Even in the preamble to that notorious piece of social engineering called the 'Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms', states: 'Whereas Canada is founded upon the principles that recognize the supremacy of GOD and the rule of law'. Who's God do you suppose their talking about? Allah? Make no mistake Canada's heritage is Christian and the Canadian government acknowledges that fact in WRITING and have acknowledged Christian values since Canada's beginning ...until an attempt made by Mr. Trudeau and his hate hate for Christianity and it's values, tried to destroy Christianity, but without success as the country is still primarily Christian and I doubt if that will ever change.

If you are in some sort of denial that marriage when combined with to-days feminist demands and materialism and unreal expectations does not constitute marriage being an ordeal, I don't know what does. The stats that I provided indicate this and that is only divorces and does not include legal separations, common law break up's, and walk aways. Previous traditional Christian marriages in Canada, did provide the majority building blocks to make Canada the country it is to-day with government catering to the will of the population. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wedding This produced civilized cities and towns, with the majority of Canada's population adhering to Christian values. If you have any evidence this is not the case, please post it. Why are so critical and hateful concerning the success Christianity had with the building of Canada?

Ditto. Likewise.

Liberals cater to self-determination unlike the Conservatives who try to run government for the benefit of the country and not for the benefit of a bunch of spoiled asses.

Couples who get married regarding the 'traditional wedding', generally have a commitment and overall plan concerning their future life together and therefore could be considered more responsible than co-habitat couples who basically have a no strings attached relationship. IOW it is an ongoing test relationship minus responsibility which could equate to irresponsibility and commitment and is bad news for children who could be raised minus solid guidance. Relating to 'Pandora's box' - means all in all, is a combination of lack of support for traditional marriage coupled with common law arrangements, different religions with different views and religious laws concerning marriages in combination with SSM, all guaranteed in keeping the legal community very happy and marriage itself, a very complex ordeal.

http://www40.statcan.ca/l01/cst01/famil04.htm?sdi=marriages Marriages have been rising. Divorces have been staying the same. Between 2001 and 2005 there has been an increase of 4,729 marriages while the divorce rate stays pretty well constant at 70,000 per year in that time frame. Besides legal separations or walk aways are not included in that figure which could push the marriage break up figure substantially higher. Even with your posted numbers of slightly more marriages, relates your chances of a successful marriage is around or close to 50%. This is supposed be good?

Area 51 is the area containing Roswell army airport. Everything happening in this area are rumours and it could be an area containing dangerous toxic chemicals or maybe even aliens. But the fact is, this is federal military property and is it is simply 'off limits' for whatever reason. Here is a map if your interested: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:Wfm_are...png#filehistory

A traditional marriage IMO is a traditional religious wedding or civil wedding, prior to SSM. In 2003 in Canada there were 70,828 divorces alone. http://www40.statcan.ca/l01/cst01/famil02.htm?sdi=divorces

WTF? Leafless, you don't blame Quebec for this? But now that you mention it and relating to this topic: 'Don't Quebecer's lead the country in common law relationships'? Not that I am directly blaming Quebec or Quebecer's but are they not directly contributing to the problem? http://www.justice.gc.ca/en/ps/inter/uni_fait_que/index.html

Hope your serious!

Well, it's a fact. The building blocks that have created Canada up until recently have been created by religious marriage unions. Traditional marriages are failing because of a break down in basic values and lack of support from business and government. The emphasis to-day is on materialism pursued by both, business and government. How can a younger married couple NOT succumb to the temptations of materialism when their budget simply won't allow it, but nevertheless pursue that path themselves and wind up in severe financial trouble, the root cause of marriage failure. Why be married, when there is no real credit for being a RESPONSIBLE CITIZEN when you are no more recognized or respected for your efforts, than someone shacked up or living common law or simply having Canada's population replaced with non-Caucasian third world foreign immigrants? You say: " Most people cant see the damage they do to their children staying in these failed marriages." Well I say the same thing to the poor hapless children that are born to immature couples shacked up or living together and to the country being transformed into a multicultural Pandora's box.

Do you not think for one moment if the Roswell UFO incident had any legitimacy, that the U.S. military would be first to capitalize on a new form of energy if one existed? So far I have not heard of any compelling evidence and the U.S military is still using that same old expensive rocket technology. Mr. Hellyer is a outright fool for making such an absurd statement, with no proof or evidence whatsoever. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Roswell_UFO_incident

IMO, business and government are to blame 100%. They have totally ignored religious views and have contributed to the destruction of marriage by removing the stigma attached to individuals who are living together under another name. There are hardly no perks to be religiously married anymore and corruptness wins again driven by greed by both government and banks who don't want to loose out on a red cent.

sounds like you are up to lots of juvenile mischief - I imagine you are liable for what you pay to publish. I meant thats just not the way to wipe out a man Means nothing anyways, it's only on paper. Gotta love these paper tigers!