LinkSoul60

lol.... sure you wouldn't 😂 How is it weaponized....because Poilievre said so? Or is it because Davies now said so despite saying a couple weeks ago it was because MP's were disenchanted with Poilievres lack of leadership? Everyone makes their own choices and clearly those who crossed the aisle believe they found a better party and Leader who will better benefit their constituents. Of course you'd say we now have to make a rule... and I'd bet my last nickel you wouldn't be saying that if they crossed to the Conservative side. Not going out on a limb thinking you're a cry hard conservative and probably have been forever. Did you say the same for rules changes when David Emerson crossed the aisle to join Harper's cabinet? People are going to do what they think is best for them. If they made a mistake in their choice then their constituents will let them know that in the next election, should they choose to run.

It doesn't matter what Poilievre thinks. He's irrelevant today and soon to be even more irrelevant. And in the not too distant future.... totally irrelevant and out of politics.

The earth's temperature began to rise exponentially at the same time the industrial revolution began. Why don't you think there is any correlation between the two?

I don't know... Admittedly haven't delved deeper into learning more about either of them because of a lack of interest. I'm not an NDP supporter but am supportive of the party surviving....which right now appears to be a long shot. And what's the matter with pot smokers or hippies? Nahhhh.... I have a couple tattoos from a lot of years ago so I think that's enough. The upside is that you DF's need a Trump or Poilievre tattoo to make fools of yourselves....

I posted a link yesterday and there are many other links that have been posted over the year I've been here. Try google and start reading. It really does work.

The thread is about the climate. The transvestite room is that way 👉

That was a general comment directed towards WestCanTranny who can't drop the subject, but the comment does have validity don't you think 🤷‍♂️

What exactly are you talking about clown, and why are you obsessed with a transvestite convo? Okay, if given the choice I'll shut up. I don't talk about trans any more so you carry on....

Well, if the younger generation listened more to the rightwing clowns they'd realize climate change ifs fake...right? Name a subject and I'll find some little tidbit you can use either for or against. That doesn't change the fact that climate change is real. If you choose to be 'distressed' about it, so be it. Most however tend to be 'concerned'.

That's 10 years down the road and said it will be looked at as the industry evolves, just like the removal of 2030 guidelines was. Last I checked the China tariff agreement means Canada will allow 49K EV's that are of a maximum $35K price tag which only makes that price range more competitive. To each their own in what vehicle you want to purchase but in my travels and as a percentage of the vehicles I notice, EV's without question are growing in popularity. Keep in mind I live in the Vancouver area so I'm sure climate and demographics have something to do with that.

It doesn't take much to amuse your simple minds does it... If ignorance is truly bliss you DF's are most certainly amongst the happiest persons on the planet.

I don't know Jackass... Ask Greta if she feared climate change, not me.

Is the source of that copy and paste from MSM, or....? Regardless, thanks for validating what was said. A synonym for 'concerned' is 'worried'....'fear' is not a synonym of.

Give your empty head a shake... you can't stopping talking about transvestites like you're continuing to do here in a 'climate' conversation. Move on....I have little interest in debating transvestites or your fascination with them.

Something tells me you would be singing loud and proud if the floor crossers were going to the Conservative Party.... It is what it is.... people are attracted right now to his government and see better opportunity to benefit their constituents by being aligned with liberals.

If everyone had the luxury of hindsight there would be few to no miscalculations of policies. The fact though is that the NA auto industry is highly integrated and if the dog (US) moves in a certain direction the tail (Canada and Mexico) inevitably follows. Nobody ever said EV's were for everyone.... with maybe the exception of Trudeau. If the value of exiting an investment is the best long term move for a company they'll do it every day. To try and retain that business and the employment that accompanies it? Again, this is a hindsight thing so answers become much easier if you know the outcome. Do I assume you believe that knowing there has been a decline in Canadian auto sector for many years we should have just said 'to hell with it' and pulled the plug on any form of incentives years ago rather than to trying to retain that business? You can only dance with the girls you brought to the party....who actually were already there dating back 80 years or so. You'll have to pardon me, but this is freaking hilarious.... and not because it's Poilievre, but the clown does add more humour to it.... A tariff-free auto pact.... seriously! I wonder if Carney and team have thought about that? You obviously haven't been paying attention to what Trump has said about our respective auto industries and his belief the US doesn't need Canada or our cars. Read above.., This is the exact opposite path Trump wants to take. I'm sure Poilievre does, but do you honestly believe that the US would be on-board with more auto production in Canada so we can eliminate US tariffs and export more there? That's comical....and highly uneducated given the what we know about the current trade position of the US. I know you're seriously anti-liberal but do you not think for maybe even a second that Carney and team have been lobbying for the same? I do see merit with this. It's too bad though he's always a year behind and should have suggested this last year when the tariffs began rather than defaulting to his only schtick of blaming Trudeau and liberals for everything, or waiting until the he needed to pivot because of his political failures. Again, you're anti-liberal, who has been doing this exact thing for the past year. The challenge Poilievre has is that he's the forklift driver. If you want to discuss business partnerships you need to be talking to the principles and influencers, not the forklift drivers. Makes sense.... Sell more oil at a lower price to US customers rather than getting a longer dollar with other export partners. I'll defer to what I said a few times above....energy security has been and is a topic of discussion in the trades talks. Correct, the objective is to argue for free trade.... that's a no-brainer. I look at it differently.... Carney hasn't 'failed' to negotiate a solution but rather it's very obvious that he won't agree to a trade deal that doesn't benefit Canada. That's simple business you learn in class 101. "Orange man' is bad for Canada....that's become quite obvious hasn't it? And yes, it does benefit Carney because of his background that Canadian's far prefer over the alternatives background resume of....,???

All party leaders would prefer a majority. Good thing for him that conservative MP's are disillusioned with Poilievre's so-called leadership and the NDP continues to falter. The floor crossers from those parties obviously see better opportunity to help their constituents with a Carney government.

Lol... Mom, look at this chart!

You can blame me for 2015 and 2025... not between those years though.

I've been saying for the last 3 pages or so that the subject was about climate yet you DF's feel compelled to talk about transvestites. That's weird man.... To humour you though.... when was the last time you or anyone you know has been in a restroom and either confronted or ogled by a man dressed like a woman.....or do you just fantasize this? And of course leftists did this.... they've slowly destroyed the world don't you think.

It's like clockwork Michael.... never changes and always the same. Just pick a subject from the climate, to vaccines, to gender, to lefties, to fake MSM and you get the same schtick from the same people. I don't know this factually but I'm thinking because it's always the same narratives that are being espoused in those topics there has to be some sort of low-end apptitude test they go through to be a certified rightwing champion...?

You appear to be a big supporter of US policy so I'm sure you'll recall that the liberal plan to go all in on EV's was very much driven by the Biden administration direction for the auto sector, with we are and will continue to be integrated with. No, nothing is guaranteed which is why incentives have to put forth to attract and retain investment for the long term. You're correct that employment and throughput in Canadian auto sector has declined over the past couple decades, and your solution to this is....what?

I have a difficult time keep up with your idiocy.... Comparing an oil refinery to all other industry as an apples to apples comparison is beyond ridiculous, even for you. You have a very high opinion of your so-called acumen, but because of your twisted views, a real misguided insight into how people think Considering that I enjoyed a successful career on the backbone of industry I wasn't then and am not now anti-industry. Calling me a proponent for climate and environmentally responsible industry would be far more accurate. In regards to liberal support.... the more I listen to you rightwing wackjobs the more inclined I am to get a liberal tattoo and vote for them forever.

You really need to lose that rightwing narrative of people 'fearing' climate change. 'Concerned' would be a much better and far more appropriate word to use. There is little to advocate for any longer as the investment in energy's transition towards clean, cleaner and renewable forms has been significantly larger than fossil fuel investment over at least the past decade. That is only to continue to proportionally increase as the time goes on. If your concern is purely financially driven, why do you discount the ~$700 we pay annually in Canada because of the impacts of climate change?

Probably not too much more in the status quo. Is this Trudeau's fault or do you think maybe Trump's tariffs in the auto sector had something to do with it?