LinkSoul60

Facts, seriously.... you throw two down saying Carney caved when he wasn't even in politics. You have credibility problem....

lol.... you're lost aren't you westcanfool 😂. Keep trying.... Because of your fascination with Maga and the mindless minions does not mean 'Trump is our daddy'. It's actually the stupidest freaking subject title I've seen here, but small wonder why considering the DF who titled it.

I addressed them jackass. Try reading.... And yet again....you're compelled to spout off knowing I wasn't even talking to you. Can't keep your mouth shut can you....

You're making a lot of assumptions... Trump isn't my problem, he's yours.

So once again.... you got nothing do you. If you thought about it, which understood thinking is a challenge for you, it's certainly appears he does have a spine by not bowing to whatever it is Trump's after and both now saying a deal is unlikely. But again, this involves common sense thinking....

So you're saying you got one of three correct.... That's pretty good for you

I understand this was a difficult question.... 'how should Carney deal with Trump's tariff threats?' So again, you got nothing right... Keep playing 3 word Maga, it suits you well.

lol... Little man doesn't know how to respond so he's off into his typical nonsensical rants 😂

You're talking abortion now, which I didn't bring up... That said, Trump is also a good example for pro-choice.

You have not answered the question nor have you explained anything. Typical....

You prove yet again how inept you are.... The date of your first copy/paste is February 19, 2025. This was before Carney became PM. The date of your second copy/paste is December 17, 2024. This is also before carney became PM. 'Regardless of what Trudeau and Biden may have talked about, Trump gave an order which our gov't obeyed.' Let me know where Carney comes into this Captain Oblivious. Want to try again?

Just stating facts....

whoa.... murder. Who said anything about murder? Your president is the perfect example of why Maga's shouldn't procreate.

No you can't. You're just an Orange Maga follower....

Got no answer do you... 😂 Ask someone to help you think about and respond to a question that requires more than 5 word response.

It's just not fair sometimes is it.... 😂 What they should be looking at for planned parenthood is making it illegal for Maga minions to procreate. Not fair for the child/children and certainly not good for the world in general....

Trying something other than your typical one line mindless minutia... how should Carney deal with Trump's tariff threats?

You should learn to comprehend what you read a bit better.... The names came out for the unsealed court documents, not the entire file, which is what your fellow Maga minions want.

In the grand scheme of things we've never sold a lot energy to the EU.... ~$32B. This so-called 'deal' is just another country telling Trump wants he wants to hear... (Bloomberg) -- The European Union’s promise to buy $750 billion of American energy imports over three years was pivotal to securing a trade deal with President Donald Trump, but it’s a pledge it will struggle to keep. The deal would require annual purchases of $250 billion of natural gas, oil and nuclear technology, including small modular reactors, according to EU officials. European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen said the bloc’s estimates were based on the existing plan to shift away from remaining Russian fossil fuel supplies and purchasing “more affordable and better” liquefied natural gas from US producers. Yet it’s hard to see how the EU attains such ambitious flows over such a short time frame. Total energy imports from the US accounted for less than $80 billion last year, far short of the promise made by von der Leyen to Trump. Total US energy exports were just over $330 billion in 2024. The huge figure for energy imports “is meaningless, as it’s unachievable not only because EU demand cannot grow that much, but also because US exporters cannot supply that much either!” said Davide Oneglia, an economist at TS Lombard. The lack of detail underlines that the deal finalized by von der Leyen and Trump in Scotland is a pragmatic, political agreement, rather than a legally binding pact. The EU has yet to provide a breakdown of the figures, and it remains unclear how private companies can be convinced to purchase or sell US oil and gas. There’s also uncertainty around how European investment in the US energy sector might count toward the EU’s pledge.

No idea.... Although we do know now that Trump was told that his name is in the files so wonder what he's trying to hide? Either way....doubt we'll know any time soon as there is no way he'll let the files be released without a long and dragged out process.

You probably want to get your 'facts' straight.... The border security spend was done and committed to during both Trudeau's and Biden's administrations.

That is correct. The truth is also that he doesn't want the files released. Wonder why?

What's the massive deal? YOU are paying the tariff and von der Leyen doesn't have the authority to commit to any buying or investing in the US. And a group of united countries that are 35% of global GDP is no fantasy. They can and will succeed. Unlike the one you live in, no fantasy world here.

I'm laughing at your ignorance and you think it's a 'hissy fit or panic attack'.... Really 😂

So we were talking about the feds building a pipeline to help out Alberta because they had done it before. And I pointed out that when they did it before it went so badly that now they can't even sell it to capacity because they have to charge so much. So it wasn't actually our conversation at all. You didn't even get who I was talking to right And has it clearly shows, What I was saying is that the pipeline was so poorly managed that they can't even sell it to capacity now. It's currently losing money for the government and it's a limited use to industry because it's too expensive to use. That's what happens when the government instead of industry builds these things. You got confused and jumped into the conversation with this: "Canadian crude shipments to China have experienced a remarkable, continuing surge" Which as I pointed out does not change the fact that the trans mountain pipeline is losing money because it was so badly organized and run that they can't make it profitable and it's not a capacity because it's too expensive . So your problem is you jumped in halfway through a conversation you didn't understand and posted facts that aren't remotely relevant to the conversation. But like I said, you did post some facts even though they had nothing to do with the discussion and you were confused about what the discussion was. And for you that's a step forward. I would like to encourage you to continue trying. The takeaway from this is that you have to make sure that any facts you look up actually pertain to the subject being discussed. I got confused about nothing. You've typed 85 freaking paragraphs and have yet to explain your comment of A pipeline that's so poorly managed that nobody can use it isn't much of a pipeline. Why is that not surprising....