Five of swords

Proud democratic party? Huh( And what the hell do the rest of your questions mean? You tell me what is wrong with being a cuck...that is what I asked you.

...but I did know what it said. I knew all about their argument when I looked into this 6 years ago lol. And clearly you don't know what physical evidence means. You just can't handle the basics of epistemology.

You seem to be assuming that it is an insult to be a cuck. Do you suffer from a lack of tolerance for the cuck community?

I agree with the left about this 100%. If you are afraid of being racist, you should not be allowed to have opinions on anything. Just remain quiet and do as you are told.

What she needs to do is convince everyone she is black. So she needs to lose all her campaign funds on corruption, drugs, and car accessories.

You are so weird. You think people have to believe 100% of what a source says on order to cite it? Lol...and you think people can't admit that they believe something for which no physical evidence exists? All of mathematics would be gone...you really have some defect in your logical reasoning.

Really? You think I didn't know it said that?

Gaston glock was a Hitler youth

I believe this is an assertion, which still lacks physical evidence. All we are arguing about is the meaning of physical evidence. Do you remember back in like 2012 when atheists would argue with Christians and ask for physical evidence for the resurrection of Jesus? Then Christians would say...'it is in the bible'...and atheists would say that isn't physical evidence? Did you have any idea what that was all about?

No, the 'experts' do not agree with you. Jews were not sent to concentration camps to be killed. This is not revisionism, it is ordinary history. https://www.theholocaustexplained.org/the-camps/types-of-camps/

Lol...not same difference. Thr holocaust 'revisionists' do not claim that jews weren't sent to camps. And they don't claim that there existed rooms in thr camps (just not rooms specifically designed to gas a massive number of people)...so all of those observations are perfectly consistent with the claims of holocaust 'revisionists'. So...it means nothing. One thing you could do to refute the claims of revisionists is exhumed an actual body near treblinka and use forensics science to show it is a jew who died during the period of the holocaust. But oh...you actually cant do that.

And yet again...concentration camps aren't the holocaust. Death camps are.

So I'm curious. Do you think train stations would exist if the holocaust did not happen?

Right...the fact train stations exist is what you consider to be physical proof...lol

So like I said the bodies will not be exhumed....are you even trying?

You are just lying, lol. I said nothing at all about whether there is a mass grave near treblinka. What I said was that whether there is one or not, you could not insist they are necessarily jewish victims of the holocaust if you refuse to perform forensics. There would be no more evidence of than than, hypothetically, them being slavs killed by the teutonic knights. And oh. You think the fact that train stations exist counts as evidence for the holocaust...lol

Wrong. Nothing wad 'implied' at all. I said quite directly that no forensics was allowed to be done on any bodies that would provide actual physical evidence that they are in fact jews who died at the correct time. Without that, you got nothing. Even if you find bodies there, you cannot claim they were jews...because no forensics will be done. So your 'physical evidence' for thr holocaust remains at a big fat zero. No murder weapon, no body, and not even a motive because all the suggestions for a motive rely on nsdap high command using 'coded language'. So nothing. Just eyewitness accounts. And eyewitness accounts do not actually count as 'physical evidence. Furthermore, you have the mystery that rabbis insist on not doing forensics and settling this case once and for all. Is it because they know the science won't go their way? It's an obvious question... So you can just keep lying and strawmanning and I will just keep on pointing it out

I am not dishonest at all. Here...I did thr Google search for you. https://www.bbc.com/news/magazine-16657363 Pay close attention to this quote from that article: "No excavation was carried out and the ground was not disturbed, which would be a violation of Jewish law and tradition, banning the exhumation of the dead." Oh. That's exactly what I said. Gee...it's weird how everyone who believes the holocaust is always caught lying, isn't it?

I did not say there was no grave at treblika. Try again.

That is exactly your argument. There is a room, therefore jews died. There are bodies therefore jews died. I was not even trying to make a claim about whether the hocaust happened or not, I was simply making a claim about ehat physical evidence exists for it. You don't seem to have a concept of what 'physical evidence' even means.

Im Just following your logic. Bodies are there, so therefore they were killed in the st George uprising. Correct? Therefore they cannot be jews.

Oh...so you deny that anyone was killed in the night of st George uprising? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Saint_George's_Night_Uprising#:~:text=On Saint George's Night

Right. So if I told you that Tibetans grinded a million unicorns to death in a temple on Mount everest, I would only need to show you that there is a temple on Mount everest to prove the story. And if I told you that all of the bodies near treblinka were actually slavs who died in the tectonic wars of the 16th cebtury rather than jews, then merely the existence of bodies there would prove that story also.

The fact you have to ask me whether I believe gas chambers existed proves that your entire premise is a lie. If I made my position on that so clear then why would you have to ask the question? What I was actually saying...and all I was I sitting on...is that we don't actually have any physical evidence for the holocaust. All of the evidence is based on eyewitness accounts. The holocaust is unusual among massive historical events in the way that it does happen to lack physical evidence. The historians who insist the hocaust occurred will agree with that particular claim. They will say the germans destroyed evidence, concealed their real intentions in coded language, etc...and they will say the eyewitness claims of a lot of jews is good enough. And if it isn't good enough, well it is simply illegal to question the holocaust. There have even been people willing to help the narrative out. For example, according to the holocaust story, there should be 400k jews buried in a mass grave near treblinka. Some dumb goy actually offered to exude some body and use forensics to prove once and for all that this mass grave exists. So of course the rabbis had to step in and insist he do not do this, because it would violate jewish burial rites. Anyway, these are actual facts. Nothing controversial about it. You can confirm everything with a simple Google search. But the subject is generally taboo and people like yourself have a sort of derangement about it. If a person speaks about the holocaust without the proper tone of reverence, then you conclude they are insane...which does not follow..and they hate jews...which does not follow.

I disagree that it will leave a power vacuum. I don't think white people have any power today so our exit will cause no vacuum.