Five of swords

It's like you just don't understand how power works lol. Technically Charlemagne was not the king of the Franks. He was lord protector. But the merovingian kings became irrelevant and obscure because there was nothing which connected them to the power infrastructure. It doesn't matter one bit what is written on paper. That has never mattered. In the entire history of the word, what is written on paper has never mattered. So you can waste your time all day thinking about law, but the people actually getting anything done are busy bribing the judges. Sorry to burst your bubble.

Lol even when the gop wins elections they still lose. Trump plans to attack Kamala for being too willing to send black criminals to prison. Trump doesn't think black criminals should go to prison. And if he wins, he will deliver on that promise...just like he did absolutely nothing to prevent the riots in 2020 when everyone had to be locked down except for black people who wanted to burn down cities. So you will get the opposite of everything you say you want, but feel like you are winning cause there was some election or sonething.

So you don't understand how the world works. I can assure you, even if it were true that it is written down somewhere that the king can dissolve the government, he can't. If he demanded it, everyone would just ignore him. Because there is a lot of money in the government...and nobody feels loyalty to the king.

It is my idea of an observation

People have fun with royal family soap opera. I guess you could say the king of England is slightly less important than the average Instagram influencer. But the idea he could have any influence on any actual power is just delusional. The king of England is objectively far weaker than the average high ranking member of a Mexican drug cartel.

Right before he granted amnesty to all the Mexicans in California...

Most important? No, literally the only thing. No matter how 'wonderful' a human you are, you are no idea to anyone if you just lose and are unable to weild any power to help anyone. If we are weak, that is our own fault. It is not the fault of the mean people oppressing us, it is not the fault of God or mother nature. It is our fault and only our fault. And crying about it will accomplish nothing, nor will begging for mercy. If you want politicians to be more honest then the problem you need to solve is how to get honest people to be more effective at politics. Because at this time they simply are not.

Nothing justifies power lol...it isn't a question of ethics. It is a question of power.

This suggestion is so wrong and so stupid that I cannot believe it wad made in good faith. Any student of history with a functioning brain ought the recognize that...as a brief list....the Russian revolution, the French revolution, and the English Civil War were quite possible despite the presence of monarchy. Indeed not only were they possible, they also won. But to add even more to that observation and show how ridiculous this whole theory is, king Charles I, czar Nikolas, and king Louis were monarchs who actually mattered and who weilded actual power...in contrast with the current king who simply does not matter and nobody cares about him. At least the white army in Russia was large enough to pose a real threat to the revolutionaries...and they were supporting a king in exile who they genuinely cared about. If the same revolution happened in canada? How many soldiers would disobey orders out of loyalty to the ceremonial and irrelevant King of England? None. Maybe 3, I guess...and those 3 guys will be people who suffer from serious psychological ailments requiring massive doses of psychotropic drugs to manage. Perhaps they would set a car on fire, but that would be the full extent of any counter revolution.

In contrast, the Republicans enjoy losing.

People lie because it works. You can wish it didn't work...but the fact that it does work is a comment on the character of the masses, not of politicians. I don't hold it against politicians at all that they do whatever works to advance their own position. What else should we expect?

Politicians lie...lol...of course. So what?

Lol whatever you say

I enjoy seeing the retarded things you say, so I like responding. But don't get the impression I'm ever going to discuss politics with you lol...you are just incapable of that

I'm sorry you made this effort post without knowing that I dont care one bit what you think about the nsdap

For you and for most people in the anglosphere, the nsdap is defined as a party that just wanted to be evil for no reason. I do not support being evil for no reason. But again, to understand that you have to be able to comprehend the axiom of substitution...so this is rather pointless for me to say.

Well I know you don't understand elementary logic and there is nothing I can do to help you. Sorry.

You did not have to be german to support them, but supporting them kinda required that the party actually existed, which it no longer does. The supporters were basically people who thought 'this German party has some good ideas and we should do something similar in our own country'. But considering th3 axiom of substitution is too difficult for you to fathom, I know that such a concept is going to go way over your head.

No dude. You fail at basic axiomatic logical reasoning. If a=b and b=c then a=c. That is an axiom. It is supposed to be so self evident that no proof is required for it. Basically, mathematicians used to think that nobody can be so stupid that they are unable to recognize that claim as true. You have proven them wrong.

The nsdap is by definition German, and there also is no such party (anymore, it is outlawed). I am also not german.

I really have no idea how to respond to elementary logic fails like this other than to say yousuffer from severe mental retardation and there is no way to have a discussion about anything with you. Sorry.

Right, so you cannot even manage the mathematical axiom of substitution. 'Everyone agrees with x' where x is 'you are wrong'. 2 step proof, a bit too many moving parts for your brain.

There is no nazi party. 'Nazi' was just a pejorative term that English speakers used for the NSDAP, which the nsdap never called itself and in fact ironically was a word that stems from the same root as 'Ashkenazi. George Rockwell called his party the 'American nazi party' but to be honest that is just because he was a bit of a clown. He had no connection to any remnant of the actual nsdap at the time such as otto remer or Leon degruelle.

From my own research on climate change, I notice 2 remarkable trends: 1) the actual scientist reports from ipcc don't predict anything that would be a big deal. Certainly not some existential threat to humans. Some Polynesian hunter gatherers tribes might struggle in the worst case scenario, but that is about it. And I personally don't care much about them. And The actual letter of the predictions seems no big deal, despite the use of a lot of scare words like 'devastating' 2) a lot of politicians and crazy people love to radically exaggerate the risk to the point of insanity...thus you had al gore with his prediction that Manhattan would be underwater by 2016. So it is difficult to blame anyone for concluding that it is all just a hoax.

Yup...bandwagon logical fallacy. Seems about your speed.