Five of swords

We can just do an infinite loop here if you want. I repeated, Hitler did not want war with poland and did everything to find a peaceful solution (as he did with Austria and sudenteland). But poland insisted on keeping danzig (violating postwar agreements). The eastern plan you mentioned had nothing to do with poland. It was Ukraine. Because millions of germans starved in the blockade at the end of ww1, and Hitler did not want germans to be vulnerable to blockades. He wanted to colonize Ukraine because it has oil and farmland in abundance. Which poland does not have. So he had no interest in annexing poland. You are just trying to conflate different things in your head. Yes the invasion of poland had everything to do with danzig...but only people with over 60 iq can understand such things

Well it would be more appropriate to mention, say, the British empire. Or Rome in its heyday. Stuff like that. Functional civilizations. What destroyed both of then seems to be the same thing, also. Which is also what ruined the mythical city of babel.

Snopes is a ridiculous source that frequently just lies in order to maintain mainstream narrative...but it has a funny way of lying that doesn't contradict the truth. The fine line between 'turning people back' and 'deporting' is doing a lot of work here, lol. The only time Trump bothered to do anything at all about immigration was in the covid response. And that wasn't him, of course. The covid response was constructed by the people who really rule the country. The president is irrelevant.

Can't be done. The average iq is like 90

Of course I don't vote. Why bother?

Babel wasn't a real place

You are, as always, severely retarded. Ukraine is not poland.

It had everything to do with germans in danzig. You are just repeating fake history. Hitler was desperate for a peaceful solution with poland, and it annoyed his own generals.

You, on thr other hand, are clever enough to know that the state never lies about anything

If they cared about the germans in danzig then no, they had no choice

Germany had no control over what happened. Of course they were going to be attacked because their political model was so successful..so it was going to be interesting and persuasive to other people in the world. But it was based on ideas that would bring down the ruling elite in the entire western world, especially the anglosphere, as well as the new communist countries. They were not going to be left alone and Hitler knew that, which is why he felt forced to re-arm (despite the burden this had on his economy, especially with their shortage of oil). Germany didn't make any mistakes in this department really. I suppose you could argue they might have opted to be a failed state and thus avoid war, but the consequences would have been no different.

What's worse is that none of this actually matters, because it is only what thr country tells us how it works. The reality is very different. Voting doesn't actually matter, for example.

They had a shot at winning the war. It wasn't a forgone conclusion. In fact in 1942 they seemed unstoppable. But whatever, it isn't Hollywood and the good guys don't always win

Well there's a lot of nuance to discuss there. National socialist Germany did not collapse from its internal issues, but rather because it was attacked by all the greatest empires on earth simultaneously. It was destroyed from outside sources. Liberalism also did not exactly collapse internally. It kind of did but not exactly. It's fatal flaw was failing to realize, as js mill said, that only a homogeneous population can maintain liberal institutions. Liberal democracies instead decided to invite jews into their society, because jews had a lot of money, and the presence of a very tribal people with money and power among a disorganized mass of mere individuals is what destroyed liberal society...just like introducing an invasive species can destroy an ecosystem. Without the Jewish element, and the increasing tolerance of jewish powern liberalism may have survived

Well the difference between our positions would be that you seem to think human society just 'is collapsing'...it is just some natural process like climate change. I would say no, it was murdered. This is all by design and with deliberate intent from sentient life forms. Here's a pretty obvious illustration of that where the connections are pretty hard to ignore: A lot of British people are upset right now because a black man killed a bunch of white girls...as black people are won't to do and especially when they are fed a bunch of propaganda about how whitey is their enemy. Why are black people in Cardiff anyway? Well historically this precedent was set by what is known as the 'windrush generation'. What was the windrush? It was a cruise ship in England that sent thousands of Jamaicans to England ostensibly to 'help rebuild after world War 2'...as if black people are the only people capable of rebuilding anything. Did the English build the windrush? No, it was commandeered from the national socialists who had used the boat in its 'strength through joy' program...Basically giving their workers vacations to make life easier for them (and promote social bonding between them, hopefully to improve birth rates'). The English took the strength through joy cruise ship and renamed it windrush and used it to make England more black. The more anecdotes like this you learn, the nore obvious the direct connection between these things becomes. But James Lindsay is here to tell you this is all the work of 'gnostics' lol...as if some fringe sect from 2k years ago are driving immigration policies. What a joke.

Sorry but you are wrong. You will not keep your nation. You will vote for Trump because he has conned you into thinking he is on your side, despite the fact it can be demonstrated that he is even worse than the democrats on this issue. Nothing is going to save you.

Well the Frankfort school was anti communist. Both Hitler and Stalin would have killed them. Face it. The elimination of nations does make the markets more 'free'. You are fed a lot of propaganda, including from James Lindsay, meant to confuse your friend enemy distinction. You cannot fight an enemy who is invisible. Anyway it is pointless to fight. The only shot your ideology had was ww2, and it lost. There is no going back now.

They aren't communists. In fact the irony is that many of the most devoted followers of this ideology are the leaders of major corporations...as of course they would be because it is good for business and keeps wages low

He's ommiting the most important aspects of critical theory which is fundamental to understanding it. He did mention 'it was floating around academia for some time' so he isn't easily proven wrong, but he is still allowing the audience to misunderstand that this is some sort of new thing. The truth is, critical theory dates to Adolf Hitler. It comes from the Frankfurt school which was a bunch of jews whose most salient belief was that liberalism is actually a better environment for jews than communism (something they were basically proven correct about when Stalin became an enemy of jews). The Frankfort school was of course kicked out of Germany and settled in Columbia University in the usa, which they dominated. Explicitly, 'critical theory' was designed to prevent the rise of another Hitler. And as the name suggests, it does so by being 'critical' of normative social norms, which they considered to be a product of the assumptions of old white (non Jewish) men. Being a post modern movement, they did not regard the 'white man' truth to be objectively better than the 'truth' of other people...and in consequence their focus was in social change rather than revealing any objective truth. And of course there was a general 'movement' to erase all boundaries...family, religion, nation, etc which had been around a long time..and indeed kicked into high gear with the Illuminati secret society...and it's presence was strongly felt in the French revolution, bolshevik revolution, American revolution, and the English Civil War, for example. Hitler was largely a resistance to that trend...and this is why Lindsay wants of omit these important pieces. Because he still wants to be on board with the idea that Hitler is evil...because he needs jewish support...because jews have the dominant power in the usa.

Obama deported more people than trump

I can't bring myself to watch his stupid videos. He's probably blaming gnostics, lol...an extinct and obsolete religious movement

James Lindsay is a guy who is consistently wrong about everything

It wouldn't matter to me even if Hitler was in some flying saucer or whatever. There isn't anything I could do with that information, even if there was a way to confirm it. I'm a very scientific thinker in general. I don't share any personal info about myself.

Absolutely I'd say like 80% chance he died in the bunker. But I have heard the weird stuff the conspiracy theorists like to point out. I don't really think it matters either way

Based on thr Nuremberg racial laws, anything less than 1/8th jewish is just not jewish. They didn't follow the one drop rule of the us confederacy...they were more tolerant. Based on how I defined race, you could logically deduce that mixing races just creates a sort of genetic chaos. Mixing races produces a person who is not really fine tuned for any particular civilization, but may operate well enough regardless. Biologists call this 'outbreeding depression' and it is an accepted phenomenon for anything other than humans. For example, mixing a Clydesdale and a thoroughbred would produce a horse that simply is not quite as good at either of the roles of its parents. Because there is a lot of randomness to how much genes you actually get exclusive to one of your parents, it is a rather open question what 'risk' there is with some % admixture. It might be possible for scientists to answer, but the complexity and the taboo of the question makes this very difficult logistically. I wouldn't be surprised, however, if Chinese scientists are pursuing such questions right now.