User

And this is why you hide from me like a coward, because I would pick this statement apart.

10 million people did not and do not have asylum hearings. Clown.

Except that climate change occurs regardless of humans, it is a constant factor in Earth's existence. Humans do not cause "climate change", which is precisely why using this terminology is purposefully deceptive. Not your doing, but those who push this are choosing this terminology instead of AGW. Humans can contribute to climate change. The question is: how much are they contributing, how bad is that, and what is the response?

Can concur, this has been happening a lot to me over the last week.

Well, we all place different priorities and values on things. I will take all the wins we have gotten so far, any day of the week, with a few trade-offs.

OK, let's talk about how you leftists must insist on calling a male a female, deceptively making it seem like this was actually a female when all along it was a trans woman.

To the point, it is hardly any real "choice" You would think, if the vaccine were that amazing and everyone believed in it so much, all these threats and mandates would not be needed. And if it worked so well, why are you so worried about people who are not vaccinated? If masks work so well, why are you so worried about people who are not vaccinated? Wear your mask, get the vaccine, you should be just fine.

I am only stuck on this nonsense inasmuch as there are people on this forum who believe this nonsense and want to push it onto society. When those same people sit here trying to pretend they are all for 'The Science! TM' I am going to mock them rightly, as they are not all for 'The Science! TM' A man is an adult human male, characterized by biological traits such as chromosomes and the ability to produce sperm.

This is such dishonest garbage. Mandated federal employees must do so, mandated that those in transportation must do so, mandated that if you wanted to travel on public transit you had to, this is not even counting all the additional regulations across each province that further forced vaccine mandates on people in numerous ways. It was a "choice" in as much if you wanted to have any kind of life or job and not live in your basement and hope you did not go bankrupt or ever need health care or anything or go anywhere...

This is such dishonest garbage. Mandated federal employees must do so, mandated that those in transportation must do so, mandated that if you wanted to travel on public transit you had to, this is not even counting all the additional regulations across each province that further forced vaccine mandates on people in numerous ways. It was a "choice" in as much if you wanted to have any kind of life or job and not live in your basement and hope you did not go bankrupt or ever need health care or anything or go anywhere...

Who says you get a gun? If you don't like guns because they are more deadly, you are gonna be walking around unarmed.

Yes, that is not an absolute statement though, as he was also collecting evidence against someone who was not a threat at the time by taking video of their vehicle. When they started to resist arrest, he was on the opposite side of the vehicle, to get to the other side to assist with the arrest, he had to move around the vehicle. These are all analyses by people who have no clue what they are talking about looking for some kind of technical angle to jam this officer up with. And so what? Even if he did violate some protocol, that doesn't mean he has to lay down and die as someone drives a vehicle towards him.

You can fight a guy with a gun. You can fight off a guy with a gun or run from them. You can also try to dodge a bullet. Everything depends on circumstances.

No, I was quite clear in what I said: My point is that calling things a military weapon is just silly nonsense. It is a leftist talking point commonly used to make weapons seem unnecessary, as you are doing, because only the military needs that! When, in reality, the military uses lots of common firearms types, there is nothing special about that. The military has a reason for needing an M240G fully automatic machine gun. Just because the military also uses semi-automatic rifles or handguns or shotguns, doesn't mean a civilian does not. The Military also uses shovels and knives, so I guess civilians do not need those either! No, you were arguing that if it was a "military weapon" it was. I don't think people need a M240G. I was clearly making the point that just because something is a military weapon doesn't mean people do no need it, but that the military does have weapons they don't. The point was to mock your continued use of "military weapon" as if that means civilans do not need it. So, you are the one who thinks they should not have knives and forks to eat, not me.

Listen, I am not even going further than the first paragraph of your link because it is pushing the same BS lies that I have debunked over and over again on here about James Baker and NATO not moving an inch east. There was NEVER any official agreement that NATO would never move an inch East. None. James Baker said this in negotiations, and afterwards said he had no authority to make such a deal, nor did NATO or the US ever agree to any such deal.

My point is that calling things a military weapon is just silly nonsense. It is a leftist talking point commonly used to make weapons seem unnecessary, as you are doing, because only the military needs that! When, in reality, the military uses lots of common firearms types, there is nothing special about that. The military has a reason for needing an M240G fully automatic machine gun. Just because the military also uses semi-automatic rifles or handguns or shotguns, doesn't mean a civilian does not. The Military also uses shovels and knives, so I guess civilians do not need those either! No, of course not. I highly suggest you just sit there and die, because shooting back at the bad guy would be more bullets flying around. Do not call the police to help either, because we only want the bad guy shooting people. There is some stupidity going on here, and it is from people like you.

Once again, there are different kinds of deportations, a difference between actually going into the interior to deport people and simply turning away 1 in 10 people at the border and calling that a deportation and bragging. Biden opened the flood gates and gave people an app to just walk right into the country, you don't get to brag that he deported millions when millions more than that were allowed to flood in.

If you can't tell there is a mental issue, how can you tell they need to have their guns taken away? The military uses shotguns, bolt-action rifles, and handguns. They also teach people to kill with shovels and knives. Everything is a military weapon.

No, your cowardice goes back to when you were doing your usual daily spam routine and I would respond to every one of your posts calling you out. You ran like a coward. Do you think Biden was a fool when his DOJ went after Pro-Life activist Mark Houck and failed to get him convicted?

They have lost their damn minds.

Yeah, I get into this same discussion with people on suicide prevention. They only care if someone kills themselves with a gun. Like, a good chunk of suicides are done with hanging/suffocation, and drugs. I guess that is totally cool, and sexist, since more females use suffocation to kill themselves compared to men, but that is totally cool. As long as they don't use a gun!

Who is going to go get the guns? Where will they be stored? The police are already maxed out and they have no room in their storage for these guns! OMG What do we do?

No, I am just pointing out the duplicity on your part how in one comment you say NATO has no reason to exist becuase Russia is no threat and then in the next you fear-monger about how Russia is a threat and will start WWIII. Yes, you are pushing lies. I have refuted this same lie of yours over and over and over again on here. To your point, you are here pushing Putins lies. Yes, I believe NATO and the evidence we have over Putin's lies. As I keep pointing out, for whatever reason, you are in the tank for Russia. This is a lie. Putin backed separatists with military support and outright Russian troops to declare breakaway republics, and then Ukraine sent forces in, more than the Azov battalion. They were not sent there to crack down on ethnic Russians. The Russian-backed separatists did not "fight back"; they were the ones who started the takeover. They did not beg Russia for help, they were already backed by Russia. That is a revision of history on your part because you are a dishonest liar who backs Russia and Putin and might as well be their spokesperson and minister of propaganda.

Yes, just as you are doing so right now. It was not murder. The ICE officer did not break all the protocols.

Your usual dishonest misdirection. You can't argue about Biden, so you deflect and ignore the point. Um, no. You kept saying there was no evidence they were drug boats as if the US Military were just out blowing up people enjoying a picnic on their sailboat. I rightly mocked you because it would have to be a grand conspiracy from every level of the chain of command to just have the military out randomly blowing up innocent people just for fun. I am not suggesting anything about the Biden DOJ, they did outright abuse the DOJ to target people for political motivations. That is an observable fact. Where you seem to be having trouble is not that there wasn't just enough excuse to do it, but that they used that excuse to contort and twist the law anyway they could to do so. Which is why I am just fine with Trump doing the same. Great circular argument you have going there.