-
Posts
8,982 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
28
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Everything posted by User
-
Wow. You NEVER get to talk to anyone here ever again about any norms, laws, or act like you care one bit about LEO. You are outright condoning and being glib about violence against police here.
-
Charting the Danger of the Modern Left
User replied to Deluge's topic in Federal Politics in the United States
Neither did the garbage you posted. -
Russia's asset or not: find one difference
User replied to myata's topic in Federal Politics in the United States
Another BS baseless assertion. -
Charting the Danger of the Modern Left
User replied to Deluge's topic in Federal Politics in the United States
Nevermind you are stretching quite a few things on that list... now review all the deaths from secular humanistic followings like Communism and the hundreds of millions it killed, Pol Pot, Stalen, Mao... and that is just the last couple of hundred years. -
Charting the Danger of the Modern Left
User replied to Deluge's topic in Federal Politics in the United States
LOL, as you accuse Trump of being a Russian agent from the 1980's... -
Russia's asset or not: find one difference
User replied to myata's topic in Federal Politics in the United States
Right, as Zelensky has also publically disagreed and gone against Trump as well. We are not Ukrainians piggy bank forever and for Zelensky to presume that was a bad move. Especially when he knows what Trump wants. Yet again... you have nothing to offer as to what the alternative is here. -
Russia's asset or not: find one difference
User replied to myata's topic in Federal Politics in the United States
The UN vote? Then Ukraine is on Russia's side too. You are pushing nothing but baseless conspiratorial garbage with no evidence on him being some asset since the 1980's that the facts here with Ukraine do not even support. Putin invaded on Biden's watch, not Trumps. I see truth, facts, and logic. You offer none of that. Come back when you can defend your BS assertions. -
Russia's asset or not: find one difference
User replied to myata's topic in Federal Politics in the United States
Really... everything? How do you know that? This is simply not true. Trump has been talking to both Ukraine and Russia on this. No, you didn't say. You, like most of the others, have no plan. You just want to criticize this one. -
Russia's asset or not: find one difference
User replied to myata's topic in Federal Politics in the United States
No, he isn't. How does peace in Ukraine enrich his own wealth and power? How do you know that is his motivation? What do you base any of these asinine assertions on? -
Russia's asset or not: find one difference
User replied to myata's topic in Federal Politics in the United States
Ukraine and Russia coming to peace with Ukraine continuing to exist is not surrender. You know what people like you can't come up with? Any other plan. You are just fine with Russia grinding down Ukraine every day for years to come until Ukraine is conquered, so long as we all keep funneling money into that you can feel good about yourselves. That is not a plan. That is not a path to victory. No, he is not on the side of Putin or Russia. He is on the side of ending this war. -
Russia's asset or not: find one difference
User replied to myata's topic in Federal Politics in the United States
No, when people like me start hammering you with facts, you put them on ignore. -
Perhaps you should care more about how your country is still funding "Hitler", along with Europe: https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/russia-oil-canada-sanctions-1.7432083 "Millions of dollars worth of Russian oil is coming into Canada thanks to a loophole in federal sanctions, providing much-needed income for the Kremlin to fuel its ongoing invasion of Ukraine."
-
Russia's asset or not: find one difference
User replied to myata's topic in Federal Politics in the United States
Trump doesn't say everything a Russian asset would say or do everything a Russian asset would do. -
Trump's speech. Live thread
User replied to gatomontes99's topic in Federal Politics in the United States
Your list so far is not very compelling. -
Trump's speech. Live thread
User replied to gatomontes99's topic in Federal Politics in the United States
"suggested" LOL, the point here is that we are finding out that a lot of people who are obviously dead, are not listed as dead, and we don't really know how many of them might still be getting paid or not. -
Trump's speech. Live thread
User replied to gatomontes99's topic in Federal Politics in the United States
Not a "lie" but a dispute on numbers. We have funded Ukraine over 100 billion and if you go by DOD numbers, that include all the tangential support that is spent, it is closer to 200 billion. There are more costs to supporting Ukraine than just giving them money directly or giving them direct military equipment and munitions. -
Trump's speech. Live thread
User replied to gatomontes99's topic in Federal Politics in the United States
That is not a lie, that kids mom was literally at the speech. -
Trump's speech. Live thread
User replied to gatomontes99's topic in Federal Politics in the United States
I can google too. This is a conversation here, not a spam session. Just like that Burma scholarship that was cancelled, the name of the program was literally: Diversity and Inclusion Scholarship Program -
Trump's speech. Live thread
User replied to gatomontes99's topic in Federal Politics in the United States
What were the lies? Was it a lie that Lakin Riley was murdered by illegal immigrants that folks like you support harboring in the country even after they are arrested for other crimes? Was it a lie that a little kid had cancer and he was honored as an honorary Secret Service agent and the Democrats couldn't even stand or cheer for that little kid? Give us the specific example of this, or you are the liar: "cut pediatric cancer funding" -
Yes, as I explained, the US mineral rights deal was not the only thing on the table. It was one step. You tried to claim it was a substitute for any other security guarantees. What is telling? Again, it is just a statement of fact. As I said, Putin is negotiating with Trump to bring about peace, so Trump is doing just that. The point is a peace deal, not to antagonize Putin pointlessly. I already explained why Trump yanked funding.
-
Again, this is a different argument, if it amounts to any type of security guarantee. I already explained exactly how it is one. You are just saying "nah huh!" is not an argument. Yes, to the point, you focus on one posted comment to social media he has walked back on saying and ignore everything else. I don't have to scramble for anything. You make a bad assertion, I call you out for it, and look... you have run away from that. Trump is working towards a peace deal, that will help Ukraine. 1-Yes, he made a dumb social media post he has backed away from. 2-Zelensky made a dumb move and posted a video to social media about how much longer this war was going to go on for and how much support he garnered in Europe and how he had funding from them and the US to last through 2025. So, Trump pulled the funding. Zelensky is an id1ot. He knows Trump is working towards a peace deal. Bragging about how much longer this can go for with American support right after that bad Oval Office meeting... he brought that on himself and Ukraine. Trump has signaled he is willing to resume now that Zelensky has responded again as being ready to work with Trump towards peace. 3- See above. Trump is not in this to help Ukraine continue fighting this war forever. Trump has called out Europe for continuing to fund Russia. Trump has been engaged in negotiations with Russia towards peace. At this moment, I don't see Putin telling Trump to go pound sand. So... why would Trump be doing anything other than continuing negotiations with them?
-
Russia's asset or not: find one difference
User replied to myata's topic in Federal Politics in the United States
Dear diary... -
Are the Democrats an Actual Cult?
User replied to WestCanMan's topic in Federal Politics in the United States
So, your big point is that some guy, looks like India, is in a cult? Ok... -
Trump's speech. Live thread
User replied to gatomontes99's topic in Federal Politics in the United States
I wonder about the signs though. I mean... just imagine if Republicans came in holding up a bunch of signs like that. They would be condemned in the media and Democrats would be crying at how awful they were. The Democrats showed one thing last night, and that is how childish and petty they are.