User

You think it’s funny that illegal immigrants are getting CDL’s and are woefully not qualified and end up killing people on the roads? Projection.

Well, you may not have been fined, but you certainly put out more lies here than they ever have.

I mean, it doesn’t say much for the political left that they lost two elections to someone you think is so stupid. Maybe… just maybe… he can say some stupid things, do some stupid things, and be someone you adamantly disagree with on policy, but still be a reasonably intelligent person and not a complete dolt like you think.

ICE isn’t being sent to do any of those things. This is a lie.

You seem woefully uninformed on what occurred last night for someone wanting to complain about how embarrassing anything was.

As opposed to the pathological lying coward you are?

Were you dressed up like a frog?

Apparently so you can say stupid things too… If you care so much about the cost, stop supporting the policies and people who encourage the lawlessness he is cleaning up.

Tear them down how? Can you offer anything of substance? Now do Corporate taxes you leftist support. You admit that taxing them is really just taxing all the people who consume their products?

Nope. You’re mostly repeating things that were already acknowledged and then treating them as if they prove something new. 1. “Some members called themselves National Socialists.” True for some early members. That still doesn’t mean the unit as an organization declared itself Nazi. Large volunteer units often contain ideological factions. 2. “They came from far-right groups.” Also true. The Azov Battalion was partly formed from activists connected to far-right movements in 2014. That’s already widely documented. 3. “They used Nazi symbols.” Some early imagery resembled symbols later used by Nazis, like the Wolfsangel. Important detail you’re leaving out: that symbol existed centuries before Nazi Germany and appears in European heraldry. That’s why historians describe the symbolism as associated with neo-Nazis, not proof that the unit itself was Nazi. 4. “Some had Nazi tattoos.” Correct. Journalists documented individuals with extremist tattoos. Again, individuals inside a militia ≠ the ideology of the entire formation. 5. “UN confirmed Azov war crimes.” That’s not what the reports say. The United Nations Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights documented allegations involving multiple armed groups in the Donbas war. They did not conclude Azov was systematically committing war crimes as a unit. 6. “Ukraine welcomed Nazi war criminals.” What actually happened is Ukraine incorporated many volunteer battalions into state command in 2014 to bring them under government control during the war. The logical problem in your argument You keep restating the same premise: • Some early members were extremists. Then jumping to: • Therefore the entire unit is Nazi. Those are not the same claim, and repeating it louder doesn’t make it more accurate. The basic facts most researchers agree on • Early Azov included far-right members and controversial symbolism. • The unit later became part of Ukraine’s National Guard and expanded far beyond that original core. • Evidence does not support the claim that the unit or Ukraine’s military as a whole is Nazi.

There is no verbal contract. None of these people had any authority to bind NATO to any such deal, these were negotiations BEFORE the final deal was ever made or comments made by people with no such authority. This has been explained to you repeatedly by me on here. This is shit pushed by Russia, long debunked, and not a serious argument.

Context. What exactly did he say he didn’t need the support for? What exactly makes this stupid? Come back when you can offer something of substance.

Projection. This is exactly how you post on this forum.

This was a post showing Tom Homan speaking about the horrific suffering and abuse of a child that folks like you don’t give a shit about because you want open borders madness. Just like you ignore and don’t care about the Americans raped and murdered.

No, once again, you prove to be your usual dishonest self. You completely ignored the whole part about any official agreement or any official NATO agreement. None of this was part of the actual final deal agreed to. As usual, you are full of shit and might as well hae Putins hand up your ass moving your mouth. You have no evidence, just a speculative question, because, as usual, you are full of shit. The US did not bring down the Ukrainian government. You are, as usual, full of shit. OK, and? These events were years apart. You have no real evidence. You are, as usual, full of shit. And like I said, woefully missing any context. So what is your point? Nothing BS about it. Where did NATO do any of this? No, you are the woke leftist twisting the facts as any other would to label people like this. I don't have time for your stupid BS, so here you go, I cheated: “They called themselves Nazis” Partly false. • Some individual founders and early members of the Azov Battalion had neo-Nazi or ultranationalist views. • The unit as an organization did not officially declare itself a Nazi organization. • Many later members had no connection to those ideologies. “They put Nazi insignias on their banners and uniforms” Partly true, but often misrepresented. • Early Azov used a symbol called the Wolfsangel-like emblem, which resembles imagery used by Nazi units. • The group said the symbol meant “National Idea” in Ukrainian. • Extremist symbols did appear among some fighters early in the war. • Later versions of the unit reduced or removed controversial imagery. “They put Nazi tattoos on their bodies” True for some individuals, not the unit as a whole. • Journalists documented some fighters with neo-Nazi tattoos or symbols in the early years. • This does not mean the entire battalion shared those beliefs. “They committed war crimes” Allegations exist, but the claim is overstated. • The United Nations Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights reported allegations of abuses by multiple armed groups in the Donbas conflict. • Some allegations involved Azov fighters in 2014–2015. • The UN did not determine that Azov committed systematic or widespread war crimes as an organization. • Documented abuses in the war involved Ukrainian forces, separatists, and Russian-backed units. “The UN agreed Azov were committing war crimes” False. • UN reports documented allegations and incidents, not confirmation of systematic war crimes by Azov as a unit. • The UN consistently reported abuses on all sides of the conflict. “Ukraine made them an official unit while they were committing war crimes” Misleading framing. • Volunteer battalions across Ukraine were incorporated into state forces in 2014 to bring them under command and regulation. • This was done with many volunteer units, not just Azov. “If it wasn’t Azov, then Ukraine’s army was killing POWs” Oversimplified claim. • Human rights groups reported abuses by various Ukrainian units, especially early in the war. • They also documented extensive abuses by Russian-backed separatists, including torture and unlawful detention. Big picture supported by most research • Azov’s early membership included far-right extremists. • The unit later became a regular formation within Ukraine’s National Guard. • Claims portraying Ukraine’s military as dominated by Nazis are not supported by election results, military structure, or independent research.

No, it really wasn't and now it is vastly more people on the left and more conspiratorial people on the left, because politics. Including you.

No, they do not. They face the same strict family reunification rules as if a Jewish citizen married someone in the Gaza strip or West Bank did... The issue is the area, regardless. Once again, you have moved the goalposts from your original, bogus assertion. There is no may about it, Israel is not erasing Palestinians or their right to existence. They had self-determination in Gaza and chose to squander it on terrorist tunnels and launching rockets from schools. They live under occupation in the areas they do because they have used those lands to launch attacks on Israel. They have turned down peace offerings in the past, as well as two-state solutions, because they only want the destruction of Israel.

I literally quoted you and responded to you. You said: "A Palestinian who is an Israeli citizen cannot purchase property in any part of Israel." That was false. You are now moving the goal posts from saying ANY PART OF ISRAEL to more difficult in certain areas.

Yes, you are running away. Yes, as I’ve pointed out already you have nothing to offer here other than status quo of being fine with cartels operating and people hopelessly addicted living on the streets victimizing people.

The comments and questions you are running away from were not in response to your inability to take a position on fixing mental illness and drug addiction... Here they are again: Murder and theft have been around forever... should we make that legal too? Of course, you didn't say anything about guns, but to the point, do you think we should pass laws to make their purchase illegal? Weapons have been around forever too!

Plenty of people said something, it was immediately taken down, and condemned as a mistake by the administration as well. You care to actually stay on point here or just want to distract and change the subject to cover more for Newsome? He was your perfect guy during COVID, too, out enjoying wine at fancy restaurants, gathering with his friends, violating his own COVID lockdown orders.

You are in a thread talking about the death of a Mexican Cartel member, as well as another, and criticizing this because of supply and demand. No? I am pointing out the flaws in your positions, and you know it, so you play dumb and refuse to respond.

Except, these are not 100% true or are woefully lacking any context, meant to be deceptive by omittance. 1. What leaders? What official agreement? There was never any official agreement or binding agreement to do this. None. NATO never made any such agreement. This doesn't justify Russian invasion. 2. This is an outright lie. It is literally Russian lies. There is no evidence of this. They were jointly working on biological lab safety, not the weaponization of anything. This doesn't justify Russian invasion. 3. The United States backs democracy promotion across the globe, there was noting nefarious with the US creating those protests, but of course, since you love Russia so much, you are here taking their side. This doesn't justify Russian invasion. 4. Another lie. No evidence of this. This doesn't justify Russian invasion. 5. Ukraine was fighting against the separatists that Russia funded, equipped, and backed with Russian regular military and mercenaries. This doesn't justify Russian invasion. 6. So what? NATO is a defensive alliance. This doesn't justify Russian invasion. 7. No, they were not, they were certainly far right, and you might as well be a leftist now playing these dumb games, and Ukraine heeded the criticism and folded them fully into Ukraine military around 2014 nationalizing them and replacing leadership making them a standard military brigade. This doesn't justify Russian invasion. Those are all the reasons why I very accurately say you might as well be working for Putin pushing this propaganda for him. You have made this stupid argument before, as NATO had already long ago moved beyond Germany, AND there was never any agreement not to. Zelenski is not letting his people die, Russia is killing them in an invasion.

Then stop crying about blowing up cartel members or arresting them. Murder and theft have been around forever... should we make that legal too? Of course, you didn't say anything about guns, but to the point, do you think we should pass laws to make their purchase illegal? Weapons have been around forever too!

We are not talking about mere "drug users" as if these cartels are making all their money from marijuana... The decision of demand is relevent because you and others keep making it seem like this is just normal consumer demand when it is not. No, the demand will not always be there if we deal with addicition AND deal with supply. So... lets test your theory then, you oppose all gun regulations and think all guns should be sold? The fact that there may or may not be demand for any particular good, doesn't mean we as a society simply make everything lawful. Of course you do not know where you are here... you want to scream about not targetting the cartels and then also have no thoughts on helping the addicts. Of course. You have no real position other than let the streets be flooded with homeless people who have mental issues and are addicted to drugs.