User

OK, that is not stopping you from posting whatever you want. However, the subject was your absurd notions on the Polio vaccine just as much as it was this anyhow. Then respond to my comments and point out which ones you need backup for.

Yes, as in damned when you push this stuff and damned when you avoid the arguments that are not going your way. If you stop pushing this stuff, admit it was wrong, then you are cool!

LOL, how did I stop you? I love how you are just going to ignore your absurdity about the polio vaccine and just move on.

You think that is bad... how many kids were getting paralyzed before the Polio vaccine?

It is what I say when people lie. It just so happens that you and your pal Beaver end up doing this a lot, so now you cry about it when I call you out. The irony is that you then go on to say I have lost intellectual credibility. You never had any.

And the chicken runs again.

I am not sure what Crack Ho really is. Maybe a dude pretending to be a woman, which is why he pushes this trans madness. Yet again, YOU started this thread. As usual, folks like you want to push this crap but then run away when challenged, so you can keep pushing it.

Note who laughed at my comment above and you will see one of the leftists on this forum I was talking about....

Yes, I have pointed this out to you over and over again. You run away like the dishonestly cowardly liar you are.

Another thread where I have repeatedly pointed out facts to prove my point that @BeaverFever cowardly runs from and lies about. You ignore all of that, though. Did you take any time to actually review how Beaver was being dishonest before criticizing me for calling him dishonest?

To be fair, I think both of them have been consistent here... it is the other leftists on the forum who certainly will avoid this thread just as they did most of them on the male boxer too...

You ignored this part... Sure... but the point is that you repeatedly lied and denied the facts, that the trees were in fact part of a special program to plant trees, not normal landscaping that would occur anyhow, and that these trees were then counted as part of defense spending. It is just a simple fact. Yet you had to go on denying it and lying about it and now running away from just admitting you were wrong.

Yet again, YOU started this thread. As usual, folks like you want to push this crap but then run away when challenged, so you can keep pushing it.

Yes, you have. Notice how you completely avoid the subject here and try to misdirect to things that were not in contention between us: 1. Tree planting planned years ago <- Not the point in discussion between us 2. Trees are "inappropriate" expenses <- Subjective, and again, not the point in discussion between us 3. NATO approved this as an expense <- Again, not the point in discussion between us This is what you usually do, you type out a bunch of shit, to filibuster, to deceive, to continue to be dishonest and avoid your lies and the point. You think if you can just BS your way out with typing up a bunch of crap, that will do something. No. It will not. I know your dumb games now. You have done this for as long as I have been here on numerous topics. You get caught saying something ignorant, get called out, then turn it into a repeated lie rather than just admit you were wrong then run away, then if you do respond come up with some lengthy bullshit that has nothing to do with anything. Again: The point is that you repeatedly lied and denied the facts, that the trees were in fact part of a special program to plant trees, not normal landscaping that would occur anyhow, and that these trees were then counted as part of defense spending. It is just a simple fact. Yet you had to go on denying it and lying about it and now running away from just admitting you were wrong.

Now you are reduced to saying it is a trivial amount of money. Sure... but the point is that you repeatedly lied and denied the facts, that the trees were in fact part of a special program to plant trees, not normal landscaping that would occur anyhow, and that these trees were then counted as part of defense spending. It is just a simple fact. Yet you had to go on denying it and lying about it and now running away from just admitting you were wrong.

You didn't know what you were talking about with the trees either, repeatedly lied, over and over again, and now you are running away like you usually do.

Yet again, YOU started this thread. As usual, folks like you want to push this crap but then run away when challenged, so you can keep pushing it.

Can't you actually respond to the facts instead of just acting like no one is ever dishonest?

Yet again, YOU started this thread. As usual, folks like you want to push this crap but then run away when challenged, so you can keep pushing it.

Yet again, you ignore all that was said: “Ultimately, that means killing his heart and raising him up to new life in Christ.”

This was just the Olympics. Of course, you say there is not much to debate, but then act like the overall problem is solved and we can move on. This is the duplicity I have come to expect on this subject.

I literally pointed out the dishonesty with how you cherry-picked the quote you did. You ignored that.

I would add, they say "open" in the quote above, but lets not forget the whole controversy with the male boxer Imane Khelif in the 2024 Olympics competing against women. Remember how all the leftists on here defended him?

The chicken runs...

Finally. Getting back to some common sense. How this was ever allowed to begin with should not be forgotten. The leftists the last 5 years were full speed ahead with this madness and are still pushing it now wherever they can. Still have to keep pushing back to protect women and little children from them. IOC bans transgender women athletes beginning with LA Games in 2028 https://www.usatoday.com/story/sports/olympics/2026/03/26/ioc-bans-transgender-athletes-beginning-los-angeles-games/89329480007/ "International Olympic Committee president Kirsty Coventry announced the change Thursday, March 26, reversing its 2004 decision to allow the participation of transgender athletes. To date, only one openly transgender woman has competed at the Olympics in 2021, a weightlifter from New Zealand who did not make it past her opening round of competition at the Tokyo Games."