User

You said freedom "from" religion. No such thing. People in government certainly can and do get to talk about their faith. They have freedom OF religion.

You have gone from one absurd assertion about their wanting a theocracy to more. There are already "religious" messages in government buildings; the Establishment Clause has never been a complete ban on such things. That aside, none of what you just said answered my question, so again: Theocracy? Where do you get that is what they are pushing towards and want? Yet again, as I pointed out in discussions you ran away from, you demand acceptance, not tolerance.

Nope. There is no such thing. Freedom of religion means the other kids in that class get to talk about their faith, wear religious materials, slogans, etc... those who disagree or don't like it don't get to be free from it. Comfort is subjective.

You already did... you are just not willing to really commit to it, for whatever reason. Remember, you said: "Israel has a right to exist and therefore to defend themselves."

How did I confuse this with the "evidence" you spoke about? I directly quoted your so called "evidence" which was: ""could", "possible", "many centuries"

I get that and my point is that we should support Israel. You should support Israel. Clear enough?

Theocracy? Where do you get that is what they are pushing towards and want? That isn't what you want though. You demand acceptance. I imagine you also support left wing states that enact laws that hide gender transitions from parents and enable teachers at those schools and the administration there to support and ait kids in their transitions without notifying parents... right? Wrong? And yes, they are targeting our children when they push the normalization of this in schools and encourage kids to engage in gender transition.

How do I not have objectivity? Hamas are the ones who are doing wrong, endangering people. No, the IDF is not doing worse than what Hamas did and continues to do.

Then we support Israel, who is in the right to defend themselves.

Not stupid at all, when you jump in here to say things like this: "It really does not matter who is right or wrong honestly. " Nevermind all your past comments. But, if you are now saying clearly, or at least the first I have seen it "Israel has a right to exist and therefore to defend themselves." Good.

Perhaps, but you can't articulate why. In this thread you are the one defending the terrorist thugs who killed, raped, tortured, and took hostages targeting innocent women and children.

Thanks for proving you don't understand predictions based on presumptions and assumptions are anything but certain.

Well, for as long as folks in the international community, like you, also continue to act like there is not a right or wrong, as if those like Hamas are right to think Israel should not exist at all... that certainly is not going to help. If people keep trying to kill Israelis, then yes, Israelis are going to keep defending themselves. That doesn't somehow mean Israel shouldn't.

Well, there is a truth to who owns the land and who does not own the land and your post here is entirely too vague... as if there is some kind of moral parity between Israel and Palestine going on. Hamas wants ALL of the land. It does matter who is right. As it stands now, Hamas launched one of the most horrific acts of terrorism and death upon the Jewish people in Israel since the Holocaust. They raped, tortured, murdered, and took hostage innocent women and children. They purposefully targeted them for that. The solution at this time is for Israel to eradicate Hamas and destroy any leadership/infrastructure that keeps them in power.

I have mixed feelings on this one. The Constitutionality question is 50/50 here. There are some precedents against it in the past already... including a previous SCOTUS ruling but they were a 5/4 decision then on a questionable legal theory test that this court might flip on... That aside though, there are so many more important things going on that this is just a political stunt for the most part and I don't like using classrooms as political proxies like this. There shouldn't be any of this garbage in a public school classroom, for the same reasons why I adamantly oppose the liberals shoving their crap like the LGBTQ flags into the schools. Either way, all the more reason I support school choice. So much power over children in such a monopoly is wrong and ripe for abuse like this. Parents need a way out.

So... Hamas stays in power and keeps killing Israelis. That is your plan. That is what you support.

This is not a statement of fact. It is a presumption of his motives, which are contrary to his public statements. His stated motivations were to expose the hospital's dishonesty and corruption. The Hospital was lying to the public. Like anyone who finds themselves in a position of a whistleblower like this, they do in fact take risks that go against policy or laws to expose the truth. That is true. The extent the DOJ is going to target him and get him though, the threats they have made to his wife, all point to yet again another instance of politically motivated lawfare, especially with the public statements made by the Federal Prosecutor bringing the case against him.

I wonder if the same people who think you can't simply declare yourself to be an Indian and it be true also believe you can be a man and declare yourself a woman and it be true...

Well, that is certainly what the Democrats are threatening with all their calls to expand the court.

So... Hamas stays in power and keeps killing Israelis with your plan.

Good thing SCOTUS has not become such a thing.

You are making an entirely different argument now. If your position is now that you support Ukraine fighting on to be able to negotiate from a position of strength, joining NATO, etc... great. Then not much disagreement from me there.

No, he has not. You guys are all upset he has a rich friend and he goes on vacations with him. Oh no! *GASP*

The Supreme Court is not all government officials, and you are not right about gifts for federal judges in general. The President can accept gifts from Americans, the restrictions mainly apply to foreign governments. It is a separation of powers issue between the branches of government. The laws and rules that apply to Congress are made by Congress. That all said... the issue here was a claim of bribery. Gifts are not bribes. Employee gift giving and receiving is bound by company policy, not any particular law. If you can't accept more than 200, that is not a law.

Oh man, the revisionist history... The way this went down, Biden and his team covered up the fact that they found classified documents and the fact that the case was turned over to the DOJ was hidden as well. It went on for 2 months before the midterms and after... only later did the news finally break and Biden was forced to make a public statement... and then the FBI started searching even more to fine more. None of this was above board... and if the news didn't break the story who knows what or when we would have never known any of this or if Garland would have really appointed a special prosecutor or not or if the FBI would have ever searched or not... They hid this for political purposes during the midterms. You don't get to act like Biden was some saint after the fact. Nor does any of this discount his mishandling of so much material as he did.