User

Wow, welcome back! In true fashion, you come back, ignore most of everything that was being discussed, and come up with more BS to post. NATO is not destroyed. Feel free to point out exactly what was confirmed. This is the dishonesty you engage in. You run away from these threads, come back and dig them up, and then lie about how we got here. You want to quibble over the semantics and ignore the actual point. You were lying about the National Security strategy and what was being talked about. I gave you an example of the liberty issues we have. Yeah, no shit Europe can do what it wants, they can lock people up for saying hello in the afternoon on Tuesdays, but the point remains, that is anti-liberty, and what they are doing is contrary to the Democratic principles of freedom of speech that the US stands for and as noted in the policy, Trump administration is going to oppose this garbage. You claimed that I engage in strawman fallacies all the time. This is not pointing one out.

1. I tend not to make absolute statements like this, but the point is that you have no qualms throwing that terminology around here, but fail to see you are just as much a culture warrior in the end as you accuse others of being. 2. I never had any issues with objective reality. Can you name the last time you thought I did, since you are now acting shocked to think I don't? As you still say "maybe" 3. Then you are the one with a problem with objective reality, not me. 4. Yes, it is. But regardless of getting into some quibbling with you on the subjective nature of how much of a problem something is... it is in fact a contentious issue playing out here in the states and even in Canada as you linked to an article on just that. You are playing coy, because you clearly have a position here, but you know it is indefensible when you are really challenged, so you balk and play these games about local laws and only say thing opposed to laws going one way, and then end with "who knows" You know. You just don't want to say, because you are a sympathetic culture warrior pushing trans ideology. 5. No, we have determined your use of "conservative" here has nothing to do with the common political use of the term at all. 6. The standards of your gamesmanship are not based solely on responding to questions, which it took me asking you the same thing 3 times before now to get you to respond... it is you saying things like "if" it is a problem. It is in fact a problem. But you play these games to obfuscate.

No, that is not a fact. Murder has specific legal and definitional meanings, basically a mens rea.

Again, you have zero interest in fact-based, honest discussion when you use such obviously absurd rhetoric like this.

"murdered" How do you even pretend like you care at all about facts here?

This is not a secular society.

1. I already know that. Except, this is not just a quibble about what "push" means as you also disavow being a culture warrior while you accuse others of the same. You use these tactics to avoid having to defend yourself or the laws/ideology you support when you push them on here. 2. LOL, sure. You are the one pushing trans ideology and that men can be women just because they say so, but I am the one with issues with objective reality. 3. Except, it is the bathrooms and sports that is one of the largest issues, and still you play coy now, trying to have it both ways, where you can not directly engage, but also indirectly support the outcome and argue against those who oppose it. You oppose laws preventing it... but the issue is also that people in power are passing laws and policy to force it. You don't have much to say there, just when people oppose that. 4. What is the point that you are making then. if it was merly that someone somewhere that identifies as a Conservative supports something... then yeah, OK. So what? 5. LOL, "if" its a problem? See, you play these games because you know you can't defend this stupidity, but you will passively support it all the same and play these games to do so.

You say this watching video in slow motion AFTER the fact... He is not the traffic police.

Before I respond to the rest... I was not talking to you. You are so excited to look for any excuse to avoid having to directly respond on here, but do try to read more closely next time before you run. No, you just run like a coward, it is just that simple.

Facts do not care about your feelings.

Awe man. Beat me to it.

"they" did not do that. One officer may have, if the facts bear that out, but the others were engaged in fighting with him still on the ground, how did "they" all know that? They didn't.

Yes, I push policy and support opposing the nonsense around modern trans ideology. We have had this discussion before, I admit to what I am doing and my positions, I do not try to obfuscate them like you do. I observe your behavior here and comment on that. What legal protections? See... I have now had to ask you 3 times and you still won't answer. You just play these dumb games. You made an assertion about Conservatives, you want me to comment on it, so show me the evidence that supports your assertion about them. You posted a link and stats that do not support your claim. 38... out of how many? The link you posted quotes members of the Conservative party and their official leaders and policy positions, that contradict you. LOL, they don't have to. But they do in fact argue they are both "women" and that trans women should get to beat up real women in physical sports, share their spaces, because they are "women" too. You are a dishonest clown and a coward hiding from me that has ran away from past discussions on this same point.

No, push means exactly that, you hold a political view on trans ideology and you support laws to this effect, defend them, argue for them, and obfuscate for them. I know your behavior and actions here, how you throw around "conservative" in discussions and avoid explaining yourself when challenged. You play your usual coy obfuscation games. What additional protections? See, you keep playing vague. Show me what data you are using to come to your assertion about "conservatives" here.

To him... still a coward hiding from me.

You do hate science, when it comes to your trans ideology you push. I digress... the point is that the way you throw around "conservative" you know you mean it to be something else other than how you use it when you are trying to pass yourself off as a "conservative" in the political sense. "deserve protection," how? They already have protection of laws, what you push is more than "protection" I am not playing any term, it is in fact what you do and what you support.

LOL, well, it all makes sense now. You are most definitely not a "Conservative" in the context you keep using it in, that being political discussions. This is the same dumb game folks like Robo play when they say ANTIFA is great, because they are Anti-Fascists and of course, who wouldn't be that and think that is OK. When in reality we are clearly talking about the anarchist/violent/law breaking leftist organization that merely calls themselves ANTIFA. No, lots of Conservatives are not OK with using the term woman as a social construct, but regardless, of course you are. You are a culture warrior pushing your trans ideology. The issue is not what you do, its what you support pushing on everyone else to do.

Do you know that you are a cowardly two faced hypocritical liar?

Well, stop giving him an excuse to do so!

Change? Words have different meanings in different applications. When folks call themselves for political purposes, it indicates their general positions on various political / policy / governing issues. You call yourself a Conservative over and over again on this forum in this context, when you are not one. Yes, what about "woman?" I forgot if you have ever been willing to actually define that term, as you are usually pushing the Trans identity stuff.

Sure Robo... your respect for the Constitution begins and ends with using it for whatever twisted biased political attack you can make.

Um... that is because the average lifespan was like 40 for much of that time... LOL So, when you call yourself one, to be clear, you realize it has nothing to do with political meaning like we actually use it today and you are using some obtuse meaning of it...

OK, and? What does this have to do with all the current and ongoing fraud?

You are cheering on and defending people storming into a church, trespassing, and terrorizing the people inside, preventing them from worshipping. If this were a bunch of Pro-Life folks doing this to an abortion clinic, you would be on here raving mad like a lunatic. This is exactly why you are a coward hiding from me, because I routinely called you out for this kind of two faced dishoensty.

Because you are a coward and an intellectual lightweight, unable to defend the BS you post.