gatomontes99

Trump's positives: Close the border to illegal crossings End the war in Ukraine Support Israel No tax on tips Let states handle abortion No men in women's locker rooms or mature sports Lower inflation Fewer regulations Opportunity zones Biden: I hate Trump and so should you! Yuengling light! Only because it is too hot for Shiner.

Are you Joe Biden? You have nothing positive. All you have is TDS.

He has nothing positive to run on. All he has is TDS.

And Biden still has nothing positive to run on. I see what you did there.

Have you noticed that Joe has nothing positive to run on?

Holly crap dude. Read the article. They arent teaching the Bible. They are teaching the Bible's influence on our nation's founding.

Are they floating the idea of ousting Joe? She would be protocol to a 25A removal from office. Oh, she might be up to it. She would be, simultaneously, the first woman and first black POTUS. She would love that.

No. Whether or not he needed to be pardoned was in question. Ford did it to end that question. The question would have been; Is stealing data from an opposing campaign part of the official duties as POTUS? I am pretty sure that answer is an emphatic no. So, yes, he was in legal jeopardy under this ruling that changed nothing prior to the Biden admin. As for DJT, there are two cases were this applies: 1. DC case regarding actions taken on J6. That amounts to second guessing how the POTUS handled his official duties. Case should be dismissed. 2. GA case regarding vote counts. DJT requested that the Gov "find the votes." That case will rest completely on whether DJT had a good faith belief that the votes existed or if the "find the votes" was a threat that implied making up votes. That later theory will be impossible to prove. Especially since every single outward projection of Trump and his team included the belief that there was cheating. You won't agree with that presumption, but the intent is key. There is overwhelming evidence that they believed there was fraud and that they turned over every rock they could to find that evidence, to no avail. Thisncase should be dismissed, but probably won't. The left is far to triggered to let it go.

I think you are projecting. The tyranny we are experiencing is through the unconstitutional and antidemocratic lawfare waged by the Biden administration. SCOTUS ended some of that. That is a good thing. Your hyperbolic arguments that Joe can do anything he wants now are absurd. The only thing the SCOTUS did was reinstate things to pre2020.

Flailing is the word that describes this election. Dems are flailing as they run a senile old man.

High crimes and misdemeanors means high crimes and misdemeanors, as it always has. Impeachment is now, and has always been, a political process. Literally nothing changed with this ruling, except the wackadoodle left can't be tyrants any more.

Oh bullspit. First, There still is and always has been checks and balances. Second, impeachment is a thing. Third, stop being such a baby. Just stop.

Well, kind of. The super pacs can still use what they have and it is possible to role some of the money back to the DNC campaign funds. But, yes, they do lose a chunk of money.

Sure things rarely exist in betting. Trump beating Biden is as close as it gets. You know that the last Maine and Minnesota polls had them tied? Even without Maine or Minnesota, Trump has such a big lead he could lose Texas and still win. Think about that.

Oh hell no. You don't say this about a sitting or ex-president. This should lead to charges. It is way to close to calling for Trump to be assassinated.

Didn't robosimp get mad at Trump for listening to Russia/Putin? Now he's listening to Russian propaganda and touting it as the truth.

It's ridiculous that you believe that anyone tried to over turn the election.

I think O'Reilly is just saying he knows as an educated guess. That way, if it happens, he can claim he was first.

The left loses their sh1t today. The Jack Smith trial re:J6 is effectively over. Now, we just need some reasonable court to throw out the b.s. lawsuit in NY and the b.s. conviction in NY and we are back to a democratic republic again. For now, tyranny lives. But it's taken a severe blow.

Oh how the left lies. Headline: "Teachers who won't teach the Bible will lose their license." Reality, the curriculum calls for teaching how the Bible influenced the founding of the nation. And I'm sure the curriculum also calls for teaching about John Locke and his Natural Rights writings. The headline is designed to feed off the prejudices of the left. This author wants the left to get mad that the right would force teachers to teach the Bible. And they should be mad, if that actually happened. But it won't. Because that isn't how we think.

I find it hard to believe that his man, that has been tossed to obscurity, suddenly had the biggest scoop of the 21st century

https://x.com/liz_churchill10/status/1807456174784303335?t=jQhl-67yQ_VfJS61XAYjgg&s=19

I've been asking that question for 3 years. The answer is in the aids. Where did his aids work before? Obama admin.

The fall out from the debate is delicious.