gatomontes99

This was a planned stop with a script. She didn't even know how to say Doritos. She calls it dooritos. She's that stewpid. She shouldn't be elected because she's not relatable and this video proves it. How can she be the leader of a country when she doesn't even understand the country?

Yep. There is no evidence other than the canceled bank checks, the Hunter laptop, WhatsApp messages, the multiple business partner sworn testimony, Joe bragging about it on video, the burner phone, the alias email addresses, the myriad of shell companies, the $27 million in deposits and more that I've forgotten. Other than that....THERE IS NO EVIDENCE! LOL

Do you see the corn nuts Timmy? And Tampon Timmy wasn't sure he had nuts!

That's what he's doing.

And they are threatening to shutdown because they are for democracy.

Any who....Harris is hiding from here record. Trump is running on his. Who do you vote for?

It's fun how you make stuff up and assume it's true. Let me try: Why do liberals do good things that never hurt anyone? See, it's funny because liberals are.extremely corrupt and all of their policies make people poor, deny medical care or just flat kill them.

House Oversight Committee Findings Between his Cognitive Decline and his corruption, Joe had to go and the Dems knew it.

Omg! So many things are wrong with these comparisons. First, social security has nothing to do with medicine Second, state and federal taxes don't go to health care. Third, Canada mandates prices. That means Canadians pay in other ways like scarcity of providers, quality, etc. It is absolutely assimine to make these comparisons.

Ffs, you can't count state and federal taxes or SS tax. Medicare is sketch since you aren't using Medicare.

So 12 X 1500 = 38000?

Where do you even find a plan that is that expensive? You have to be lying.

Well, I actually gave you an abbreviated rundown of how it came to be. It took only a few minutes to locate the information on the internet. Maybe if you hadn't been so eager to find fault and spent just a moment of time getting educated on the subject, you could have avoided looking foolish. The reality is the name Americans is not an official decree but rather a colloquial reference that "stuck" and then morphed. So, no, they did not name themselves after the continent.

Yeah, it goes up as a percentage. Read the first post you quoted. This time, try following along.

Ok...I wasn't talking about what caused inflation. I was talking about why businesses show higher profits during inflationary periods.

What does that say about you when factual data (i.e. 198% increase in wait times) is considered an extreme right wing bias. To put it another way, you consider the facts (aka reality) to have an extreme right wing bias.

In 2023, physicians report a median wait time of 27.7 weeks between a referral from a general practitioner and receipt of treatment. This represents the longest delay in the survey’s history and is 198% longer than the 9.3 weeks Canadian patients could expect to wait in 1993. Supply v Demand will always prevail. If cost can't be changed, something else must be sacrificed. The sacrifice is going to be availability or quality. The country's health-care system is suffering from an acute shortage of doctors — even as hundreds of qualified Canadian physicians trained abroad are turned away each year because of a tangle of red-tape and bias, experts say. Sure, you can say that it doesn't cost much to have healthcare in Canada...but do you have health care? There is a severe shortage of doctors. Over the summer, physicians, politicians and policy experts have rang the alarm bells, warning Canadians about the beleaguered state of our health-care system. While many of the proposed solutions focus on individual issues (the physician shortage, for example), few address the systemic nature of the problem. In reality, Canada’s health-care system has been on the verge of collapse for years, and its long past time to consider the sort of meaningful reforms needed to repair it, if not outright save it.

You are thinking logically though. You arent her base. Her base is the people that are emotionally centric.

Trump out negotiated her. She wanted one debate. He forced her into two. The Alpha dog is clearly Trump.

They just need a bad guy to attach the emo response that libs have. That way they can claim to be the saviors riding in on their culturally diverse, non binary horse of color (but not so much color that white people get scared) and pretend to save the day with an emotionally charged solution.

It occurs to me that Harris isn't proposing smart economic policies because that doesn't suit her base. Her base is looking for an emotional response with direct impact and control. Where as conservatives and economists understand that price controls (the most important tool in communism) are enacted m, they have dire consequences: supply shortages, black markets, quality loss. Liberals/progressives view the control as a solution to a problem. If the problem is things are too expensive, just mandate that they aren't expensive. Consequences be dawned, they feel good that they helped. Harris isn't playing to the smart. She alienating them and playing to the emotional.

You probably haven't worked in retail or you wouldn't post such a meaningless stat. That's OK, let's use this a teaching point. Let's say you have a widget store. You sell the finest widgets on your block. Every month, the widgets you sell out you $10 a piece. For easy numbers, let's say you sell 100 widgets a month. For the purposes of demonstration, we will ignore overhead, taxes and all other costs. If you sell the widgets for $10 a piece, at the end of the month you would have $1000. You could replace the widgets but you would make no money. So you sell the widgets for $15 a piece. You put $1500 in your register. However, you habe to replace the widgets to have something to sell next month. At the end of the month you have $500 profit. You rich bastard. This month, your supplier notifies you that the cost of the widget must go up to $15 on your next order. If you buy this order at $10, sell at $15, you will have just enough for resupply, but nothing for you. You decide to raise your prices to $20. You make $2000. When you make your next order, though, you spend $1500. Does that mean your profit was $500? Absolutely not. You made a profit based on your original cost of $1000. So your profit (2000 - 1000) is $1000 or a 100% increase. You still have $500 in your pocket, but the profit was far higher. Now, let's reinduce taxes. If you make $1000 profit, you pay taxes on $1000. When you compare actual cash in hand from before the cost increase to after, you actually have less money even though you doubled your profit. You poor bastard. There may be some corporate greed. I'm not in their books. I also don't know if they are using LIFO or FIFO for tax purposes and how that may have impacted their profit. But, inflation and replacement costs are the primary driver here. The democrats, however, see an opportunity to capitalize on the emo responses of their Goerbels. They want to increase taxes to increase control and move the ball closer to authoritarian socialism/communism.

They all did the same stupid sh1t.