gatomontes99

Also, prove that using the jet means something.

Prove the tape is real. Get voice analysis and computer analysis showing the voice is real and it isn't AI.

He didn't just say they violated the rules, he was very upset and said something like [if we don't enforce the rules, then what is the point of having them]. So SNL is in for a violation.

Prove it. Prove the tapes are real.

Apparently this speech convinced Harris to tell Joe to stay home. Just like she benched Mark Cuban.

I'd be so happy if they did. We could send all our libs to London, Paris and Toronto and Canada can send us all the truckers that hate vacine mandates and their supporters. Seems fair to me.

USA Today: Your lies are easily debunked.

Yeah, all those tax cuts and reduced regulations and energy independence and fewer wars are just going to be horrible. We need sex change surgeries for illegal aliens in prison and baby killing and taxes on money we don't have to make us happy and better.

My point was there isn't enough time to prove they are fake. Prove me wrong.

Dude flew with his wife, nanny, infant and son. Do you remember that they had a reciprocal agreement to use each other's jets? It's a common business jet practice to trade time. They don't have to be friends. They just swap time to have something to use when their jet is down for s heduled or unscheduled maintenance. A lot of the time the agreement is part of a management company's practice.

Right And they just happened to be found less than a week before the election when their authenticity can't be verified? Yeah. So believable.

I don't need to. There is nothing believable.

She is the first person to run for President without winning a primary and the first person to perform a soft coup after the primary.

She hides her true self. Trump doesn't.

Lmao Is a normal temperament not letting the staff look her in the eye? Dropping the f bomb like it's an adjective?

Lmao...right. ok. You believe that.

What's the alternative? Seriously...what is she? Of course we know what she is. She is the most liberal Senator that supports all kinds of b.s. We know she was the one in charge of fixing the border and look how that went. We know she was supposed to negotiate the Russia/Ukraine conflict and she failed. Trump does what's popular. It just happens that what is popular is what i support. A secure border, lower taxes, fewer regulations, no wars, etc. It isn't brain washing. He's the tool I'm using to get what I want out of this government.

The most damaging stories are ones that change the preconceived notions of a candidate. Tell me Trump is a playboy billionair and I'll believe you, but it's baked in. Nothing changes. Trump is someone that floats ideas to see if they gain traction. Some do, some don't. He's transactional. He does what works. Sometimes it looks like he's changing his position because he is. But he's not violating his core principle because his core principle is to be popular. Harris's core principle is to be liberal. She's violating that core principle on many of her new positions.

Nothing to see here! It's just the administration trying to pressure a red state into letting illegal aliens vote. That's not cheating if the government does it! /sarcasm

If the Iowa poll was true it would confirm the old saying that Iowans are Id1ots Out Wondering Around. But, it isn't true: https://projects.fivethirtyeight.com/polls/iowa/ That one poll was an extreme outlier. It was an attempt to create momentum and enthusiasm for a campaign that has faltered.

Uh huh. Trump contradicts himself so often that you couldn't even list one. Harris, on the other hand, said she hated fracking before she was for it, hated the wall before she was for it, wanted tax increases before she was against it, supported Gaza before she supported Israel, was for a gun buyback program before she was against it, for government run health care before she was against it, for packing the courts before she was against it, for a federal jobs guarantee before she was against it, and for defunding the police before she was against it. I'm sure I missed some. But at least I can list a few off the top of my head and mine are actually true. My guess is you will have to look some up and those will be mischaracterizations of what he said.

You can't defend something you've never acknowledged or experienced.

At least he's debunking the left's lie that they are peaceful.