gatomontes99

Funny how they waited until after the election to unseal charges and prove the plot was real.

What? No link? Nope. The link would have shown you to be a liar. Trump never ordered Session to open an investigation. Sessions did query whether reopening what Comey closed was worth while. It was determined it wasn't. /endstory https://www.nytimes.com/2019/04/24/us/politics/jeff-sessions-hillary-clinton-donald-trump.html

When you pick people because they do a good job, their plumbing and melanin content are not relevant. Wiles is the first woman to hold the position because Trump appreciated her work on the campaign. So she's the first, so what? She was the right person for the job. Pointing out no woman has ever done it before only serves to further divide men and women. Just let be what is.

Just your opinion if you don't provide a source. I don't have to provide a source because I know the facts.

I warned you!

Liberals are all about

I hope someone checked on her:

But! Emotions! Ahhh!

I found the winner. It's just about the perfect symbolism for the D party. ***WARNING*** DO NOT WATCH IF LAUGHING OUT LOUD WILL GET YOU IN TROUBLE AT WORK ***WARNING***

What happens when we get to the end of his second term and he doesn't do any of it?

No. I've watched both sides of the arguments and I know what the facts are. They challenged the election. That happens. Gore did it on 2000. Kennedy did it in Hawaii and won. The problem they had was that they were chasing bad voters after the tally. They should have been doing what they did this year and challenging the votes before they are counted. That way the judge had a remedy. There was no remedy to ballots that have been deidentified and counted. I didn't lie about anything. You made this ridiculous argument that because Trump didn't do Hitler like things in his first term and Hitler didn't either, so Trump could still be like Hitler. The stewpidity of that argument is that every politician in the US did nothing like Hitler in their first term. Further, Trump did so many things that Hitler would never do. He appointed judges that took power away from the federal government. He reduced regulations. He cut taxes. He made it a policy to not use the military in foreign countries. So, yes, I boiled down the ridiculousness of your argument to its core statements. The fact that you call it a lie and would ignore me for pointing out the logical flaws in the argument speaks to your inability to form a coherent, consistent and cohesive argument as well as your inability to accept your own mistakes.

The FBI should investigate this. Your pain is the country's gain. Now we don't have to work as hard to defend our freedoms, or yours.

This has the earmarked of ANTIFA. I'd put a lot of money that ANTIFA, or some liberal organization, is trying to make the point that Trump is racist and sent these messages because that proves everything....in their mind.

It does highlight the difference between conservatives and liberals. Conservatives are about logic, where as liberals are about emotion.

The children just dont know how to take defeat.

Trump broke you.

But that wasn't the problem...in their mind. In their mind, they didn't scream loud enough.

Why would Joe give Trump the opportunity to f his son?

Manchin will support a justice nominated by Joe. Manchin doesn't want an imbalance of power. He wouldn't support a push to let Trump take another seat.

Oh, he is joyous. He didn't like Obama and he's mad at Kamala. They pushed him out and he loves that they lost. Now, it's time for him to pardon Hunter. Probably about 10 minutes before inauguration.

They should blame the policies. The economy, immigration and state of democracy were top of mind with voters. Maybe they shouldn't threaten to raise taxes, give amnesty to illegals and try to jail their opponents. Liberal behavior is 100% why they lost.

This is what I was talking about. They will just take their pis$ poor tactics and keep applying them only louder and more crazy. You do understand that the deportation will start with those that break the law?

Well, yes, it would have to be an amendment. However, you can't do post hoc law changes and apply those changes to people that followed the law. If an amendment was proposed, it would only apply to births after ratification date.