Jump to content

gatomontes99

Senior Member
  • Posts

    7,714
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    61

Everything posted by gatomontes99

  1. It's literally an investigation that was started under Biden and it isn't a Twitter rumor, it is a full blown indictment. The same thing you just knew made Trump guilty. The thing is, now they have actual bank receipts. Money changed hands. The evidence is real and substantial. This is going somewhere.
  2. He's talking about new indictments. This was only 2019 to 2023 I believe. And it was only a handful of people. Except Blanche says they opened an investigation during the Biden administration years and it was suddenly halted without explanation. "Initial Investigation: Acting U.S. Attorney General Todd Blanche stated that an investigation into the SPLC's use of paid informants to infiltrate groups began years ago during the Biden administration. Abrupt Stop: Blanche indicated that the investigation was "shuttered" during President Biden’s term, with the suggestion that officials at the time opted not to bring charges before the Trump administration revived it." https://share.google/aimode/2UK0EssTmPaBLsFc5 So weird how the SPLC was blatantly violating laws and supporting white supremacists and the Biden DOJ just did nothing about it. Even more weird how the SPLC financed the Charlottesville riot. Looks like all the white nationalists at that rally were paid for by the SPLC. Amazing huh. The SPLC caused that violence in a false flag event. Weird how that happened and yet here you are acting like they are some hollier than thou organization. Does that mean you support agencies that fund racists?
  3. Her changing a form does not fix it. She either lied on the form before or she is lying now. Either way, she lied.
  4. Bongino called this whole thing. The left tried to cast doubt on Patel by making claims of him day drinking and not being available. Bongino knew that was false, he was there.
  5. We can ask questions about that. But let's not draw any conclusions from asking questions.
  6. Brandon does an amazing job of telling THE story of Omar's fraud. The hilarious part is...well, there are several...she changed the figures to make herself look less successful. I think she thought she would avoid prosecution. The problem is she admits to checking the document before it was turned in. So she is liable either way.
  7. AP The Justice Department alleges the civil rights group defrauded donors by using their money to fund the very extremism it claimed to be fighting, with payments of at least $3 million between 2014 and 2023 to people affiliated with the Ku Klux Klan, the United Klans of America, the National Socialist Party of America and other extremist groups. “The SPLC was not dismantling these groups. It was instead manufacturing the extremism it purports to oppose by paying sources to stoke racial hatred,” Blanche said. ********** We all knew this was a fraudulent DNC front group. But I had no idea just how scummy they were. I knew the left was dirty. But I am shocked at just how nasty this is. They paid the KKK so they could say white supremacy was rising. They paid people to steal documents and then paid other people to take the fall. They funneled money to fake groups designed to sound like conservative hat groups like Exalted Knights of the KKK and Fox Photography. They say this is politically motivated. I say hell yeah. We should all be politically motivated to stop this b.s. This, on the day Sheila Cherfilus-McCormick resigns for defrauding the government and stealing funds from FEMA. She will likely go to jail for that. And more information is coming out about Omar that I am about to post in a different thread. The left, especially the left that holds power, is insanely dirty. Let's clean house now.
  8. Yes. But I dont understand them either. Israel won't bomb us if the opportunity arises. Iran will.
  9. Just hope they were not smuggling Uranium out in that tanker. That would make the left feel really bad.
  10. Just....ehhh...gawd....the severe lack of awareness. I think I find his floor and then he does that. Its.....itss. ...wow.
  11. Words on paper. They meant nothing to Iran. They just needed enough space to build their bomb. That is why they demanded to be able to dictate where inspectors could inspect and banned specific military bases from inspection. Words on paper meant nothing because we could not catch them if we played by the rules. It was probably the worst agreement in the history of the United States. That is not hyperbole. It took us down the road to nuclear bombs in every major European capitol and maybe even the US. This war was the real world equivalent to cutting the red wire with one second on the timer.
  12. Outstanding post. Several people have said "Republicans are not the solution to all your problems but Democrats are the cause of most problems." This holds true to that statement. The Democrats voted for a bad agreement that led to the short war with Iran. Worse, their bad agreement put us dangerously on the edge of a nuclear holocaust. The war with Iran will go down, in history, as an short, incredibly consequential "excursion".
  13. I mean, I thought those were obvious enough that I did not have to set them up. But if you need a couple of examples, sure. First, I gave as much evidence as he gave. Everything he said was a straw-man. He provided no examples other than his fabricated scenarios. For example, he said MAGA's response to "he did not get congressional approval for war" is something stupid. I forget what he said. It was lame. But, the actual response I nse from most MAGA is "the POTUS has authority to take swift military action for a set period of time before approval is needed." Of course, that didn't fit his straw-man arguments. Now, the entire video was an ad hominem attacks on anyone that might appreciate a MAGA argument. The assertion here was that MAGA does not debate rationally or have serious opinions and there fore should not be taken seriously because they are all stupid. He wanted to assert that MAGA opinions are not worthy of consideration. So he created a list of accusations, not backed by any substantive or even realistic examples, that render MAGA opinions unworthy of consideration. All the while he accused MAGA of engaging in straw-man, ad hominem, what-about-ism and hypocrisy that just filled his videos. Then he just made up this b.s. about Charlie Kirk being unprepared and never proving a point. Which is ironic because this guy can't even prove his point against the straw-man fallacies he created. Further, Charlie was extremely well prepared. He would quote scripture off the top of his head. He knew studies and would quote them on any topic. He wouldn't just prove his point, he would pick apart the opponents po in it and then prove his point. He did it in a 1 on however many showed up setting. He took on the best of whomever showed up and was pretty much owning them. This guy's is a fake. A wannabe. A loser that can't form a coherent thought against real competition. No wonder @robosmith loves him. Two peas in a pod.
  14. This is going to fall apart in court: SkyNews "The 35-year-old was on duty and driving a rented, unmarked SUV on the hard shoulder of a highway in the city on 5 February when a car moved into the same lane to try to slow Morgan's vehicle down. The driver of the other vehicle didn't know he was an officer, Hennepin County Attorney Mary Moriarty said on Thursday. After the other car returned to the legal lane, she said, Morgan pulled up alongside and pointed his service weapon at the two people in the vehicle. The car's driver told investigators they feared it was a "crazy person driving down the road aiming guns at people". According to the warrant, Morgan then merged his SUV back into traffic ahead of the alleged victims, who took photos of the SUV's licence plate on their phones. Morgan and his partner, who was not charged, told investigators they were returning to their base at the end of their shift." ********* What will happen in court is the real story will come out. The agents left the scene of a deportation. The "victims" (probably protesters that were harassing the agents) followed and tried to impede them. The ICE agents passed them, using the shoulder and flashed their gun, maybe even pointing it at them. Libbies went ape shit with a gotcha moment.
  15. Degraded is not nearly a strong enough word. And?
  16. Did anyone watch the 6:22 of irony? He literally did everything he said MAGA was doing. He created a straw-man to prove MAGA creates straw-man arguments. He attacked MAGA for their supposed use of ad hominem attacks. His lack of self-awareness was amaze-balls! Yes, I am bringing back amaze-balls. I miss the 90s and yeah.
  17. Can someone define imminent? It apparently does not mean what I thought it meant.
  18. Someone save this for year end awards. Most delusional post of 2026.
  19. https://truthsocial.com/@realDonaldTrump/posts/116420395293904982 And the left will say we lost.
  20. It occurs to me that being normal is now considered extreme right as opposed to the year 2000. Discuss.
  21. "That stunning line on the limitations of the whistleblower's knowledge was not included in the nine-page letter then-House Intelligence Committee Chairman Adam Schiff, D-Calif., released in late summer 2019 that touched off a months-long political maelstrom and led to Trump's impeachment by a Democrat-led House and his eventual acquittal in the Senate."
  22. No, the original complaint claimed first hand knowledge. They discovered it was second and third hand knowledge and confronted the whistleblower. The whistleblower confessed. So they changed the form to allow hearsay. No. Hearsay was not whistleblower eligible. And this is not corporate America. No he did not.
×
×
  • Create New...