-
Posts
2,338 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
1
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Everything posted by CrakHoBarbie
-
Actually the computer repair shop owner delivered the laptop directly into the hands of Rudy Giuliani. How is it that you were unaware of that extremely important bit of info? The fact that Giuliani had it in his possession before the FBI got it, puts into question whether the data was tampered with. Either which way, you are sorely Ill informed on the topic. Do better. https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/2020/10/21/rudy-giuliani-gives-alleged-hunter-biden-laptop-authorities/6005040002/&sa=U&ved=2ahUKEwi479zY4_r8AhVuN0QIHRk7A38QFnoECAEQAg&usg=AOvVaw0U6npvJGYWfD6pDyGD-n9E
-
I just love the way y'all MAGA fools convict folks on speculation alone. It's the mob mentality. The kind that used to lynch folks before all the evidence was in. Y'all jump to conclusions, then dig your feet in, demanding you're right. You people make me sick. It's what happens when tiny minded people try to take control. Y'all are clusterf__k after clusterf__k... Just waiting to happen.
-
Schiff was absolutely wrong to make that statement without viable evidence to back it up. But, that certainly does not mean that the provenance of the laptop, after being in Giulianis possession, should be ignored. That laptop needs to be gone over with a fine tooth comb to insure none of the files were manipulated in any way.
-
No you did not you f__,king halfwit.... You speculated that the news of hunters laptop would of secured the election for Donald. .... And here's the kicker... You so f__king stupid that you can't discern between speculation and viable evidence. If, as you say, this whirlwind news about hunter is so viable, why hasn't it been presented in court as such?..... It's because it's speculation... Not viable evidence of fraud. You are just too stupid to know the difference.
-
Absolute nonsense. What I've always required, before I judge someone, is evidence viable enough to be substantiated in a court of law. You present that, and I will jump on your bandwagon.... From day one I've been open to hearing viable proof. But you've never presented anything worth noting. You are completely hung up on trusting your "opinion" which is based on speculation. In the final analysis, the only conclusion left is you are a halfwit.