reason10

Are you STUPID? This isn't about creating CO2 or not. It's about the SOURCES of CO2 into the atmosphere. You have LOST this argument based on the facts. 1. Termites cause more CO2 to go into the atmosphere than human activity 2. CO2 is a FRACTION of a percentage point of the greenhouse gasses. 95 percent of those gasses is water vapor. Gee! Maybe that's because AROUND SEVENTY PERCENT OF THE EARTH'S SURFACE IS WATER. 3. During the Ice Age, concentrations of CO2 were much greater than today. And the earth did not warm. You can't spin it. If you try, you only look dumber.

Fossil fuel CO2 has been in the ground for millions of years, and unlike biological sources, it actually increases the concentration of CO2 in the atmosphere where it stays for hundreds of years. First of all, fossil fuel DIDNT EVEN EXIST until humans found a way to use it to replace horses for transportation. The term FOSSIL FUEL didn't even exist. Back then it was just a dark substance found in liquid form in a few acres or in solid form to be mined from caves. Before the internal combustion engine was created, coal and oil contributed NOTHING to the atmosphere. Even NOW with coal and oil use at an all time high (INCLUDING COAL AND OIL USE IN THE COUNTRY OF CHINA, WHICH YOU GOOSE STEPPERS APPARENTLY WANT TO GIVE A PASS ON THE CAP AND TAX SCHEMES) termites STILL put more CO2 into the atmosphere than ALL human activity combined. And ALL atmospheric CO2 is less than a percentage point for ALL greenhouse gasses. We could TRIPLE the release of CO2 into the atmosphere and it STILL would be less than a percentage point of all greenhouse gasses. Those are the numbers and the facts. If you are going to CONTINUE to stupidly try to suggest that a tiny fraction of a natural substance will somehow change the global climate, be prepared to be ridiculed and called stupid. It's what you are. 'Right now, the climate is not changing. It probably will not change in the next hundred years, but if it does HUMANS have zero to say about it. You goose steppers tried to suggest the earth would warm so much that the poles would melt and Florida would be under water by now. Hate to disappoint you little Adolfs, but our coastline looks pretty much the same as it did BEFORE Algore made his ridiculous claims. You cannot spin this. You have LOST this argument. Move on.

Fact Check? Seriously? Are you just plain RETARDED?

The Miami Herald is a lying left wing opinion rag. It has ZERO credibility. I'm just echoing what MOST OF AMERICA believes, whether you fcking like it or not. Your goose stepping opinions are a MINORITY.

WRONG ALL AROUND. I present facts. You don't. During the ICE AGE there was MORE CO2 than today. During the time of the Dinosaurs, there was MORE CO2 than today. We account for less than a percentage point of all GREENHOUSE GASSES. TERMITES CREATE MORE ATMOSPHERIC CO2 THAN HUMANS. So human activity is not influencing ANYTHING. The CFC bullshit was based on junk science from people who wanted to patent a new coolant, since the patents on Freon lapse. The whole OZONE HOAX was a big NOTHING. Oh, and it wasn't in the 70s. Back then the idi0ts were worried about global cooling. The ozone LIE came about around 1990.

Excuse me? A TAX is a market solution? Are you the DUMBEST HUMAN OF ALL TIME? Taxes are GOVERNMENT, you MOR0N . And humans don't even put that much CO2 into the atmosphere. http://iloveco2.com/termites-emit-ten-times-more-co2-than/ The public has been led to believe that increased carbon dioxide from human activities is causing a greenhouse effect that is heating the planet. But carbon dioxide comprises only 0.035% of our atmosphere and is a very weak greenhouse gas. Although it is widely blamed for greenhouse warming, it is not the only greenhouse gas, or even the most important. Water vapor is a strong greenhouse gas and accounts for at least 95% of any greenhouse effect. Carbon dioxide accounts for only about 3%, with the remainder due to methane and several other gases. Not only is carbon dioxide’s total greenhouse effect puny, mankind’s contribution to it is minuscule. The overwhelming majority (97%) of carbon dioxide in the earth’s atmosphere comes from nature, not from man. Like I said, you're BLUE STATE STUPID.

I have presented SCIENCE. You haven't simple as that. Human activity is NOT putting that much CO2 into the atmosphere. http://iloveco2.com/termites-emit-ten-times-more-co2-than/ The public has been led to believe that increased carbon dioxide from human activities is causing a greenhouse effect that is heating the planet. But carbon dioxide comprises only 0.035% of our atmosphere and is a very weak greenhouse gas. Although it is widely blamed for greenhouse warming, it is not the only greenhouse gas, or even the most important. Water vapor is a strong greenhouse gas and accounts for at least 95% of any greenhouse effect. Carbon dioxide accounts for only about 3%, with the remainder due to methane and several other gases. Not only is carbon dioxide’s total greenhouse effect puny, mankind’s contribution to it is minuscule. The overwhelming majority (97%) of carbon dioxide in the earth’s atmosphere comes from nature, not from man. You have LOST this argument.

For the EnviroNazis who STILL somehow think human activity can change the climate of an entire fcking planet. http://iloveco2.com/termites-emit-ten-times-more-co2-than/ Termites emit ten times more CO2 than humans. Should we cap-and-tax them? During the 20th century, the earth warmed 0.6 degree Celsius (1 degree Fahrenheit), but that warming has been wiped out in a single year with a drop of 0.63 degree C. (1.13 F.) in 2007. A single year does not constitute a trend reversal, but the magnitude of that temperature drop — equal to 100 years of warming — is noteworthy. Of course, it can also be argued that a mere 0.6 degree warming in a century is so tiny it should never have been considered a cause for alarm in the first place. But then how could the idea of global warming be sold to the public? In any case, global cooling has been evident for more than a single year. Global temperature has declined since 1998. Meanwhile, atmospheric carbon dioxide has gone in the other direction, increasing 15–20%. This divergence casts doubt on the validity of the greenhouse hypothesis, but that hasn’t discouraged the global warming advocates. They have long been ignoring far greater evidence that the basic assumption of greenhouse warming from increases in carbon dioxide is false. Manmade emissions of carbon dioxide were not significant before worldwide industrialization began in the 1940s. They have increased steadily since. Over 80% of the 20th century’s carbon dioxide increase occurred after 1940 — but most of the century’s temperature increase occurred before 1940! From 1940 until the mid-1970s, the climate also failed to behave according to the greenhouse hypothesis, as carbon dioxide was strongly increasing while global temperatures cooled. This cooling led to countless scare stories in the media about a new ice age commencing. In the last 1.6 million years there have been 63 alternations between warm and cold climates, and no indication that any of them were caused by changes in carbon dioxide levels. A recent study of a much longer period (600 million years) shows — without exception — that temperature changes precede changes in carbon dioxide levels, not the other way around. As the earth warms, the oceans yield more carbon dioxide to the atmosphere, because warmer water cannot hold as much carbon dioxide as colder water. The public has been led to believe that increased carbon dioxide from human activities is causing a greenhouse effect that is heating the planet. But carbon dioxide comprises only 0.035% of our atmosphere and is a very weak greenhouse gas. Although it is widely blamed for greenhouse warming, it is not the only greenhouse gas, or even the most important. Water vapor is a strong greenhouse gas and accounts for at least 95% of any greenhouse effect. Carbon dioxide accounts for only about 3%, with the remainder due to methane and several other gases. Not only is carbon dioxide’s total greenhouse effect puny, mankind’s contribution to it is minuscule. The overwhelming majority (97%) of carbon dioxide in the earth’s atmosphere comes from nature, not from man. Volcanoes, swamps, rice paddies, fallen leaves, and even insects and bacteria produce carbon dioxide, as well as methane. According to the journal Science (Nov. 5, 1982), termites alone emit ten times more carbon dioxide than all the factories and automobiles in the world. I don't know how the scientists have compiled THIS little tidbit (since one of the mor0ns here tried to claim CO2 was lesser or greater during the time of the dinosaurs) but here are the facts. During the time of the dinosaurs, the carbon dioxide levels were 300–500% greater than today. Five hundred million years ago, the level of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere was 15–20 times what it is today. Yet the catastrophic water-vapor amplification of carbon dioxide warming never occurred. Today we’re told catastrophic warming will result if carbon dioxide doubles. But during the Ordovician Period, the carbon dioxide level was 12 times what it is today, and the earth was in an Ice Age.

You are getting DUMBER by the minute. GREENHOUSE GASSES. WATER VAPOR NINETY SEVEN PERCENT. If you are STUPID enough to try to say that Carbon Dioxide has a DIFFERENT characteristic from WATER, present some PROOF. Or admit YOU ARE A LIAR WHO JUST TRIED TO MAKE THIS LIE UP. HOW THE HELL CAN SOMETHING LESS THAN A PERCENTAGE POINT HAVE MORE OF AN EFFECT THAN SOMETHING THAT IS NINETY SEVEN PERCENT? You are CLEARLY BLUE STATE STUPID.

Excuse me, but you REALLY need to get a source a little more scientific than THE VIEW. 97 PERCENT of all greenhouse gasses is WATER. (which kinda makes sense since most of the surface of the earth is WATER) CO2 is not even a full percentage point of greenhouse gases, and human's represent a small percentage point of that. Termites release more CO2 into the atmosphere than humans. As far as what happened the last time the climate of the entire earth changed (I guess we can start with the ICE AGE) I'm not sure even PBS or CNN could possible shit some proof that there were humans in America driving SUVs shortly before that happened. You'll have to prove that SOMETHING could have produced enough CO2 to affect the ecology of an ENTIRE PLANET, and so far you haven't given any reliable sources for your other claims.

It is NOT Algore's company YOU FCKING LIAR. He didn't build it. He created NOTHING. He just bought shares.

Trump handed out over $2 Trillion during Covid and due to Trump’s terrible management, about $400 billion of it went to fraud. That is a fcking LIE and you are a FCKING LIAR. And it has NOTHING WHATSOEVER TO DO WITH THE SUBJECT OF THIS THREAD. Presidents do NOT have that kind of authority. Are you just TWO FCKING YEARS OLD? These student loans went to 18 and 19 year-old kids trying to improve their lives, and now they’re being crushed by the predatory interest rates they’re being charged. Of course these people are working for a living because if you’re out of work you can’t pay the loans anyway. The MOR0NS signed a contract. Didn't they READ it? Predatory interest rates? According to whom? Perhaps they should have just gone to their local bank and taken out a near ZERO interest loan, since they were such fine upstanding citizens and great credit risk. Basically a bunch of IDI0TS figured they could get Uncle Sugar to pay for their Gender Studies degree and would INSTANTLY be hired at six figures. The Occupy Wall Street movement is all about such a group of idi0ts who thought they were ENTITLED to six figure salaries because of their Lesbian Dance Theory degrees.

Left wing POLITICAL sites? And you whine like a bee itch when i cite Investors Business Daily.

Apparently YOU DON'T.

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/michigan-house-passes-bill-using-wrong-pronouns-felony-fineable-10000 Michigan House passes bill that could make using wrong pronouns a felony, fineable up to $10,000 Under the new bill, 'intimidating' an individual in regards to their gender identity can result in prison time or a $10,000 fine A recently passed bill in Michigan could make it a felony to intimidate someone by intentionally using the wrong gender pronouns, according to some legal experts. Michigan's state House of Representatives has passed bill HB 4474, a piece of legislation that criminalizes causing someone to feel threatened by words. Under the new bill, offenders are "guilty of a felony punishable by imprisonment for not more than 5 years, or by a fine of not more than $10,000." This NAZI edict is not law yet. The fact that a bunch of goose stepping NAZIS actually voted FOR it shows that Hitler LIVES.

Watch the entire video. It is very informative.

Biden was NOT elected. He won by voter fraud. And the NAZIS are using 71 bullshit felony indictments in a pathetic attempt to keep LEGALLY ELECTED PRESIDENT TRUMP FROM RUNNING, just like the NAZI PELOSI HOUSE tried to use illegal impeachments to stop LEGALLY ELECTED PRESIDENT TRUMP. Even the NAZIS (defined as DEMOCRATS) know that Unelected Joe DID NOT BEAT TRUMP AND WILL NOT BEAT TRUMP. Anyone who thinks otherwise is high on meth.

You left wing NAZIS are the ones who are incapable of ANY kind of thinking, critical or not. YOU'RE the ones pushing NEO NAZI policies. Get over yourself, Fraulien.

Boys and girls, if it SNOWS in Miami in July with temperatures dropping to the teens, THAT IS A CHANGE OF THE CLIMATE. If the temperature gets to 100 in January in Alaska, causing rain storms, monsoons, hurricanes, THAT IS A CHANGE OF THE CLIMATE. If ALL OF AFRICA is buried under a BLIZZARD that lasts from May to August, with below zero temperatures, THAT'S CLIMATE CHANGE. So far, none of the global warming nazis are coming close to that here.

Weather is not climate? https://www.dictionary.com/browse/climate the composite or generally prevailing weather conditions of a region, as temperature, air pressure, humidity, precipitation, sunshine, cloudiness, and winds, throughout the year, averaged over a series of years https://dictionary.cambridge.org/us/dictionary/english/climate the general weather conditions usually found in a particular place: https://www.vocabulary.com/dictionary/climate The climate is the general weather in a particular region. https://www.oxfordlearnersdictionaries.com/definition/english/climate [countable, uncountable] the regular pattern of weather conditions of a particular place You're just blue state stupid.

These Nazis never took a science class in their entire lives. https://www.dictionary.com/browse/climate the composite or generally prevailing weather conditions of a region, as temperature, air pressure, humidity, precipitation, sunshine, cloudiness, and winds, throughout the year, averaged over a series of years When they try to use that bullshit climate versus weather thing, you gotta wonder if they ever made it out of the blue state second grades they dropped out of.

You Nazis are always dragging out that dumbass "climate/weather" argument when you don't know what the fck you are talking about. Climate is defined as prevailing weather patterns in a particular area over a period of time. On the planet, MOST OF THE SURFACE OF WHICH IS WATER, there are MANY climate zones. There is no such thing as a global climate. I don't care how many graduates from left wing diploma mills want to push higher taxes on us as a way to lower the temperature of a planet, THE SCIENCE IS CLEAR. Humans cannot raise or lower the temperature of even their own climate zones. Humans CANNOT cause it to rain or snow, nor can humans STOP rain or snow. Humans can't even divert a Category Five hurricane. Sometimes, I wonder if you goose steppers every made it out of kindergarten. Explain to us the link between medical issues and weather issues. Are you REALLY that stupid? (Take your time in trying to answer that.)

And there is ZERO EVIDENCE that human activity on FOURTEEN FCKING PERCENT OF THE EARTH'S SURFACE IS THE REASON FOR THE PLANET HEATING UP, WHEN THE PLANET HAS HEATED AND COOLED LONG BEFORE HUMANS EVER GOT HERE. You are DANGEROUSLY stupid.