reason10

When an animal is let out of jail and he rapes your entire family and kills them, come talk to us about how bad cash bail is. Oh, and prison is designed to PROTECT THE PUBLIC from the animals who have robbed, kidnapped, raped and MURDERED the innocent. Those animals BELONG IN THOSE CAGES.

A couple of educated responses. 1. Anyone who cites Salon is a M0RON. 2. Oprah Winfrey THAT VERY RICH BLACK WOMAN WHO IS ALTERNATELY THIN AND FAT, benefited from slavery. Her ancestors were brought here by Democrats. Republicans freed her family and gave them the equal rights to make her rich. Relatives she left behind in Africa were probably eaten by lions. 3. This fall, I'll be subbing at some middle schools. I'll look for the Social Studies classes and check it out. That's the quickest way to let you know that once again Salon is LYING.

Too bad you're fkcing STUPID. Nothing in Aldean's song suggests breaking any laws.

https://www.foxnews.com/media/ex-secret-service-agent-assesses-white-house-cocaine-probe-likely-fairly-good-idea-culprit Ex-Secret Service agent assesses White House cocaine probe: 'Likely they have fairly good idea' of culprit If COCAINE was found in the home of a black or a Latino family, they would be arrested and the house would be taken from them and sold on the market. WHITE is the only reason Hunter and Unelected Joe aren't in jail.

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/secret-service-close-white-house-cocaine-probe-without-finding-suspect Secret Service closes White House cocaine investigation, says it is 'not able' to identify suspect ARREST UNELECTED JOE AND HIS DRUG DEALING SON.

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/secret-service-confirms-cocaine-found-white-house Secret Service confirms cocaine was found in White House Unlike LEGALLY ELECTED PRESIDENT TRUMP, Unelected Joe IS GUILTY OF A FELONY. ARREST THAT SON OF A BITCCCH.

There are a few Alzheimer mor0ns here who voted for him illegally and think he was anything but a total disaster.

Nope. The DemoNazis illegally took power. And Nazi Peiosi is to blame for that minor dustup on Jan 6. As far as being offended by a song...

Let's compare songs, shall we?

That is incredibly LAZY of you. An intelligent (and there are so few of us intelligent/read CONSERVATIVES here) poster would scour the web with facts from reliable sources. But you just want to wave people off and pretend you're important.

There are actually halfway houses for hardened felons who get out after serving long sentences, mostly because (a) they are unemployable in legal jobs, and (b) they should be watched so they don't lapse into the behavior that got them in prison in the first place. It IS bullshit. Liberal judges are setting violent criminals loose on a vulnerable AND STATE DISARMED public. That won't happen here in Florida. You get out of jail and try to rob someone in a small town, get ready to meet your maker.

You point the finger of vapid nonsense while citing a MARXIST LENINIST HITLERIST left wing opinion rag? Seriously? Maybe YOUR small town (in that ignorant BLUE STATE that shat you) is a meth crazed hell hole). Meth and Crack are YOUR SIDE OF THE AISLE, fraulein.

Excuse me, but YOUR MARXIST LENINIST HITLERIST side of the aisle was the first to start belittling small town folk as being inferior to city dwellers. The elitism is on you. It would seem that cities attract the scumbags, the welfare cheats, the lazy homeless, as well as the executives who build all the big buildings and leverage the city to pay their tax bills. And again, the lyrics of the song don't come anywhere NEAR your fictional accounts.

You excused KKKlinton, and PEDOPHILE JOE.

Actually, small towns don't have those horrific incidents of mass looting, probably because the kids in those towns are raised by decent, law abiding families and not by lazy stupid welfare queens downloading child after child, getting a check and losing the father. Small towns (except for, probably, suburbs to Chicago, especially those poor folks who now have to deal with Chicago's recent overturning of cash bail laws.) The lyrics suggest Well, try that in a small town See how far ya make it down the road 'Round here, we take care of our own You cross that line, it won't take long For you to find out, I recommend you don't Try that in a small town

https://www.cbp.gov/frontline/border-crisis-cbp-fights-child-exploitation https://www.heritage.org/immigration/commentary/biden-shovels-millions-nonprofits-aid-his-open-border-schemes-congress-must For more than two years now, the Biden administration has been encouraging and mass-releasing millions of illegal aliens into the country. To accomplish its goal of unlimited illegal immigration, the administration relies heavily on NGOs to receive, process, transport, lodge, and counsel the illegal aliens. The administration pays the NGOs billions of taxpayer dollars through numerous federal departments—including Homeland Security, Health and Human Services, State, and Justice—for this migration weaponization used against America’s interests. These NGOs and the Left hide behind faith-based organizations to keep their federal grants flowing and to distract from the horrific results in terms of human devastation, death, sex trafficking, forced child labor, national security and public safety threats, and more. Unfortunately, the faith-based organizations are more than willing to lead the pressure campaigns to safeguard their revenue streams. https://blog.petrieflom.law.harvard.edu/2018/06/27/the-intersection-of-human-trafficking-and-immigration/ Woman account for about 80 percent of individuals involved in sex-trafficking, with some estimates stating that a quarter of these cases involve minor children. The average age for females at the time of entry into sex-trafficking is thought to be between 17–19 years old. https://www.unodc.org/e4j/en/tip-and-som/module-12/key-issues/children-on-the-move--smuggling-and-trafficking.html Like flows of all irregular migrants, flows of child migrants are mixed. Some are asylum seekers and refugees while others are seeking economic and social opportunities. Some are victims of trafficking and other crimes, while others are smuggled migrants. Some are unaccompanied or separated from their families, while others travel with them. Not all these categories are exclusive; in many cases they may overlap. One child may be a smuggled migrant and a victim of trafficking (see Module 11 for the overlap between smuggling and trafficking), and that same child may also be seeking asylum. https://nypost.com/2021/03/22/us-mexico-border-traffickers-earned-as-much-as-14m-a-day-last-month/ Criminal cartels that are trafficking families, women, children and single adults over the southern border earned as much as $14 million a day in February, according to a report on Monday. “Trafficking is a multibillion-dollar industry,” former Tucson Border Patrol Chief Roy Villareal, who retired in December after 30 years with the agency told Fox News. “A lot of these vulnerable populations use their life savings. Some are essentially indentured servants and they’re working off this debt for a long period of time. In other cases, some of these migrants are asked to transport narcotics or some form of crime to work off a different part of their debt,” he said. https://www.heritage.org/immigration/commentary/federal-judge-the-obama-administration-aids-and-abets-human-trafficking federal judge in Texas has issued a searing indictment of the Obama administration’s immigration policy. He accuses the government of “completing the criminal mission” of human traffickers “who are violating the border security of the United States” and assisting a “criminal conspiracy in achieving its illegal goals.” The judge calls the administration’s behavior “dangerous and unconscionable” and says that “DHS should cease telling the citizens of the United States that it is enforcing our border security laws because it is clearly not. Even worse, it is helping those who violate these laws.” On December 13, federal district court Judge Andrew S. Hanen of Brownsville, Texas, issued his order in U.S. v. Nava-Martinez. It described in shocking detail the malfeasance of the government. Mirtha Veronica Nava-Martinez, an admitted human trafficker and resident alien, pleaded guilty to attempting to smuggle a ten-year-old El Salvadoran girl into the U.S. This was Nava-Martinez’s second felony offense; she was convicted of food-stamp fraud in 2011. She was caught at the Brownsville & Matamoros Bridge checkpoint in Texas, after being hired by “persons unknown” to smuggle the girl into the U.S. The girl’s mother, Patricia Elizabeth Salmeron Santos, is an illegal alien living in Virginia. She had solicited the unknown smugglers to get her daughter from El Salvador to the U.S. for the agreed-upon price of $8,500. As Judge Hanen pointed out, the human-trafficking conspiracy instigated by Salmeron Santos was interrupted when Nava-Martinez was arrested, but the “goal of the conspiracy was successfully completed thanks to the actions of the United States.” Hanen expressed grave concern over the “apparent policy of [DHS] of completing the criminal mission of individuals who are violating the border security of the United States.” After the child was taken into custody, DHS agents learned that the mother had “instigated this illegal conduct.” Yet DHS delivered the child to the mother and took no enforcement action: “It did not arrest her. It did not prosecute her. It did not even initiate deportation proceedings for her.” As the judge said, “instead of enforcing the laws of the United States, the Government took direct steps to help the individuals who violated it,” conduct for which any “private citizen would, and should, be prosecute.” What especially angered the judge was that this was the fourth case of this nature that he “had in as many weeks.” All involved “human traffickers who smuggled minor children [and] were apprehended short of delivering the children to their ultimate destination.” In each case, the parents were in this country illegally and had initiated and funded the illegal activity. And in each instance, DHS completed the crime by delivering the child to the parents and refusing to take any action against them. As the judge pointed out, this means that DHS is encouraging “parents to put their minor children in perilous situations subject to the whims of evil individuals.” According to the judge, “this concern for the safety of these [children] in not fanciful or theoretical; it is a real and immediate concern.” While the Santos child had been transported in a car, “others are made to swim the Rio Grande River or other bodies of water in remote areas.” As Judge Hanen was waiting for the judgment in this case to be prepared, “two illegal aliens drowned, two more are missing, and a three-year-old El Salvadoran toddler was found abandoned by smugglers” just outside of Brownsville. This DHS policy troubles Judge Hanen for three reasons. First and most important, human trafficking is controlled by and helps fund the drug cartels. He didn’t need to list the dangers facing minors and adults as they are smuggled into the U.S. In the last year alone, the judge had “seen instances where aliens being smuggled were assaulted, raped, kidnapped and/or killed.” Judge Hanen cited a long report on drug cartels that describes their “exploitation and trafficking of children” and the “violence, extortion, forced labor, sexual assault, or prostitution” to which they subject children and adults. “Time and again,” the judge related, “this Court has been told by representatives of the Government . . . that cartels control the entire smuggling process. These entities are not known for their concern for human life. They do not hire bonded childcare providers to smuggle children. By fostering an atmosphere whereby illegal aliens are encouraged to pay human smugglers for further services, the Government is not only allowing them to fund the illegal and evil activities of these cartels, but is also inspiring them to do so.” By virtue of this DHS policy, American citizens are “helping fund these evil ventures with their tax dollars.” Second, Judge Hanen said that the DHS policy “undermines the deterrent effect the laws may have and inspires others to commit further violations.” Since it is DHS policy to deliver the smuggled children to their parents and not initiate deportation proceedings against them or prosecute them for human trafficking, they “perceive that they have nothing to lose but some time and effort. If the human traffickers are successful, so much the better — mission accomplished. Even if their co-conspirators are unsuccessful, the Government will finish the job of the human traffickers — mission still accomplished.” Even worse, this DHS policy is “encouraging individuals to turn their children over to complete strangers — strangers about whom only one thing is truly known: they are criminals involved in criminal conspiracy.” That the DHS policy is encouraging human trafficking cannot be doubted. Judge Hanen cites statistics showing that the number of UAC (unaccompanied alien children) apprehensions along the U.S.-Mexican border “increased 81 percent from FY2010 to FY2012.” As the judge says, “an 81 percent increase in two years should tell the DHS” what its policy is doing: “it encourages this kind of Russian roulette.” Finally, Judge Hanen said that this DHS policy “lowers the morale of those law enforcement agents on the front line.” They “do their best to enforce our laws” with “no small risk to their own safety.” It is “shameful that some policymaker in their agency institutes a course of inaction that negates their efforts.” Judge Hanen made clear that it is not his “goal to divide or separate family members.” But there is no reason why DHS cannot “reunite the parent and child by apprehending the parent who has committed not one, but at least two different crimes.” Instead, American taxpayers are not only paying the cost of transporting smuggled children across the country for delivery to the illegal alien parents, but are also paying room and board for the children and the salary and travel expense of a guardian to accompany them. The judge calls that “an absurd and illogical result.” Judge Hansen said he would not address two issues that some might raise: whether it is in the best interests of this ten-year-old girl “to be reunited with a parent who had previously abandoned that child in a different country . . . [and] whether a responsible parent would place her child not only in the care of total strangers, but also in the care of total strangers which she knows are criminals.” He did note, however, that “most courts in the United States would not find that to be good parenting.” As Judge Hanen concludes, the decision of Salmeron Santos to smuggle her child across the border “even if motivated by the best of motives, is not an excuse for the United States Government to further a criminal conspiracy, and by doing so, encourage others to break the law and endanger additional children.” The DHS policy is “as logical as taking illegal drugs or weapons that it has seized from smugglers and delivering them to the criminals who initially solicited their illegal importation/exportation. Legally, this situation is not different.” While the court “is not blind to the needs of a minor child,” a concern for common decency does not compel the government “to not only aid, but also reward an individual for initiating a scheme to break the laws governing the border security of this country.” And it does not compel “the Government to aid the drug cartels who control this human trafficking.” Finally, Judge Hanen tossed out the excuse the Obama administration often gives for its highly questionable behavior: prosecutorial discretion. The judge said that while prosecutors have the ability to defer prosecution or arrest in particular cases, “it is not aware of any accepted legal principle, including prosecutorial discretion, that not only allows the government to decline prosecutions, but further allows it to actually complete the intended criminal mission.” The court ends with a stern admonition to the Obama administration: “The DHS should enforce the laws of the United States — not break them.”

I see, so you are saying if someone tries anything like that in a small town, he will be shot by the American cowboy. Nothing in the song comes anywhere NEAR that lie. Of course, in blue cities, people are shot by cocaine cowboys all the time. When you make such assumptions without even hearing the song, you look even more ignorant and intolerant than usual. I'll save you the misery of the electric guitars and the honkytonk country harmony. Here are the lyrics. I'll accept your apology a little later. https://genius.com/Jason-aldean-try-that-in-a-small-town-lyrics

1. Yes great logic. You have proven my point: according to you, because I didn't go to see your stupid movie I am pro child molestation. That's a lie. I said that if you called the movie ridiculous without actually seeing it,that makes you a pompous windbag. Like Limbaugh tried to tell you lefties,WORDS MEAN THINGS. 2. Your logic is bad and your behaviour disgusting. Please DM me with the date by which you promise to leave the forum. The reason I haven't ever requested that you do the same, (DM with a promise to leave the forum) is because you are not that important. You're just another member of the unthinking, uneducated Hitler Youth here and you really don't have that much impact on anything important. Oh, and I'm certainly able to tolerate ignorance and stupidity and disgusting behavior FROM YOU AND ALL THE OTHER LEFT WING GOOSE STEPPERS HERE, so I'm not going to throw a tantrum here and ask someone to leave the and box. I might be gone from this forum for longer periods of time, when school starts here in Florida. Unlike the welfare cheating left wing bums here, I put in very long hours on both jobs. Somehow I prefer the company of Florida third graders because they are better educated than you and all the other liberal goose steppers here. You ARE occasionally fun to watch, when you put on that imperious, sanctimonius cloak of elitism.

Everything is economics in the end, this is why some folks voted in the rural areas with Obama against Romney, the rural areas in general are about economics. Actually, because Romney and Obama were basically on the SAME PAGE, ideologically, those people were voting for color. Sure, but how about similarities? AI technology in the big cities is programmed by engineers to be deployed and help farmers all over North America. Productivity and Effectiveness are being met by folks in both rural and city life that want to move society forward. Some are just left to rant. You should listen to the song. It has a lot of images of Democrat voters committing vile acts of violence. IA was not mentioned. (but thanks for showing us your CONTEMPT for rural areas and farmers, like somehow you living in a urban cesspool is superior.) As far as moving society forward, I don't believe these DEMOCRAT VOTERS are doing that. Basically, the song stresses that it is not a good idea to try that shit in small towns. I'd probably qualify that statement by adding "Florida small towns," since blue state small towns weren't enough votes to keep the goose steppers out of office.

What gives you the impression that I'm anything other than relaxed. Already the retarddds have bashed this song and accused it of fomenting lynch mobs. But we'll wait patiently while you reveal a small town that has THIS.

You haven't cited ANYTHING from the US Department of Justice, you LYING TWIT. Your only source is a failing left wing opinion rag, that is less reliable than the National Enquirer. Governor DeSantis has PREVENTED damage not only to disabled children but to healthy children as well, by sending those child trafficking ILLEGAL ALIEN ANIMALS to Martha's Vineyard. But you want child traffickers in Florida, so I guess you support them. Crawl back under your rock,TROLL. Your ONLY source in the first post is the failing left wing Washington Post.

You just HATE losing an argument, you idi0t. I'm not accusing anyone else of LYING. You are the only LIAR here and I have provided reliable links to prove it. Crawl back under your rock TROLL.

I don't think that I have said much if anything about that topic. I'm pretty sure your real name is not Roger Ebert, so it's unlikely that you have critiqued the film. If you're just saying the film is ridiculous without actually seeing it, because you are on the side of the MAP crowd (Minor Attracted People) then you have some explaining to do. But somehow I just can't picture a pompous windbag like you actually paying to see ANY Jim Caviezel movie. "Hmmmm... MICHAEL doesn't post much about condemning illegal immigration... and since that's a source of trafficking, that must mean he SUPPORTS it" Illegal aliens ARE child traffickers. If you support illegal immigration, you support child traffickers. If you are like most of America and don't want those animals jumping the line in front of LEGITIMATE IMMIGRANTS waiting to enter this country, that's different.

I'm not faced with any solid FoxNews proof, you ignorant fck. The article I posted FROM FOXNEWS dates back to 2016, you mor0n. And you haven't cited any FoxNews article that suggests anything happening today. Fox4 is local news from a Fox network in the small town of Cape Coral. If you didn't have reading skills inferior to Downs Syndrome infants, you might have read that part of my post. As far as disabled children goes, YOU LYING NAZI FCK, I have a history of subbing for many ESE classes in the system, which would include emotionally damaged, autistic, and THOSE WHO REMIND ME OF YOU,THE DOWNS SYNDROME BUNCh. (Except the latter isn't as STUPID as you are.) I'm around the teachers who have to deal with them, (including a 5th grade girl socially promoted even though she is unable to count past 20, and probably she's smarter than the blue state schools that socially promoted your ignorant a$$ You're just a LIAR and you have been caught in a LIE. Crawl back under your rock,TROLL.

The OP is not about whether people like Sound Of Freedom or not. The box office stats show that people kinda LIKE it. (Sound Of Freedom cost 14 million to make and has so far grossed 85 million. You can dislike ANY aspect of the movie (which would only work if you actually saw the movie and didn't listen to what some dumbass blue state pedophile has to say.) If you actually took the time to INTELLIGENTLY read the first post, you might have discovered that the people who are complaining about this film are ACTUAL PEDOPHILES. They consider themselves MAP, (Minor Attracted People.) I'm not necessarily bashing any group, but if MAPS act on their urges, they are CRIMINALS. If they even order the type of pornography they would need to beat off to, they are CRIMINALS. Nobody has accused you of that.