I'm of the opinion that reporters shouldn't link every single weather event to climate change. Climate change is happening but climate doesn't change from year to year. It follows a long-term trend. We don't have a lot of fires this year as opposed to last year due to climate change. What's more, these scaremongering articles and baseless predictions are designed to frighten people into supporting climate change initiatives that quite frankly, are all but useless. They have also managed to frighten increasing numbers of people, notably younger ones, into believing the world is going to end during their lifetimes and that everyone is either going to die in massive floods or burn to death in the tremendous blast-furnace heat. Greta isn't the only young person driven halfway loony by these beliefs.
Yet the IPCC doesn't predict any such thing. In fact, for northern hemisphere countries there'll be only minor disruptions, and by and large they (we) have the economic, organizational, and technological abilities to adapt to those disruptions, be it with stronger building codes, flood control, and irrigation systems. Unless, of course, we're driven into poverty by moronic policies like Trudeau's net zero - which the Royal bank says will cost Canada $2 trillion.
And I'm not surprised climate activists disagree with Lomborg and will use any means, fair or foul to discredit him. I don't believe everything he says but at this point I believe almost nothing these people have to say. And they're the ones doing the 'fact checking'. And seriously, did you think the Guardian was going to provide an unbiased profile for this guy?