ExFlyer

Great, a history buff. Just like a drama teacher LOL Why does he need security, so far he is nothing but a simple MP. All groupies enjoy rubbing elbows with their idols.

The link that says this about a topic that was about Canadian mandates??? He recognized that and made no further comment but you, on the other hand...... LOL "You are quoting an American fake news network and a right wing reporters comments as your source?? C'mon, you have to be able to do better than that LOL" Oh and, I laughed at your statement: "That insult forms the crux of every leftist argument, especially from @ExFlyer. "I refuse to consider those indisputable facts and stats because I feel like the person who cited them is poopy." No insult to West, just telling him that an American fox report has nothing to do with Canadian mandates. Which has what to do with whatever you are trying to say?? Man, you sure like to twist things and make stuff up. Ha Ha Ha You make me laugh so much.

Ha Ha Ha. Funny guy. The man of yore making stuff up again

Jones credibility issues besides having his ass sued of by the Sandy Hook lies: "Claimed the federal government has turned “weather weapons” on its citizens. • Claimed the government has used chemicals to turn people gay — and that “the majority of frogs in most areas of the United States are now gay” because of the experiments. • Said people would “let [Robert] Mueller rape kids in front of people, which he did,” before walking back the assertion. • Promoted the “Pizzagate” conspiracy theory that Hillary Clinton and top aides were running a satanic sex-trafficking ring out of a D.C. pizza restaurant, then backtracked and apologized. • Suggested the following were inside jobs and/or false flag operations: 9/11, the Boston Marathon bombing, Charlottesville, the shooting of Rep. Gabrielle Giffords (D-Ariz.), the Brussels terrorist attack and the massacre at the Pulse nightclub in Orlando. • Falsely connected the Chobani yogurt company and its employment of refugees to child sexual assault and a rise in tuberculosis. (Jones later settled a defamation suit brought by Chobani.) • Was sued after Infowars falsely identified the shooter in the Parkland massacre." https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2022/08/08/alex-jones-republicans-tucker-carlson/

Just another poll The Poilievre divide: Ontario MP preferred leader for Conservatives but not Canadians "The poll suggests Charest is considered the best option for the Conservative leader's job by 22 per cent of all Canadians, while Poilievre is supported by 16 per cent." "However, more than one in four people polled said a Poilievre victory would make them less likely to vote Conservative, compared with one in five who said that about Charest." https://www.msn.com/en-ca/news/canada/the-poilievre-divide-ontario-mp-preferred-leader-for-conservatives-but-not-canadians/ar-AA10vkJF?ocid=EMMX&cvid=de01acf15e184abc8ff6fc5fceb89343

OK

OK, you caught me with words but you clearly missed the point. But hey, it's your vote to do with as you wish.

Bizzare? As they say, to the victor goes the spoils. Didn't say it was a waste, just not a benefit.

Oh and lately poopyheads

No, I am just saying that the majority of funding goes to the winning party ridings. Some always dribbles down to the unfaithful, but not much. Mind you, with upcoming elections, there will be a lot of promises made but, if the riding votes the wrong way, the promises disappear. I am surprised you are surprised at this.

Yeah, no kidding eh LOL He just keeps coming back trying to suck me into his cult

Pretty well. Now, if you voted NDP, who also lost but struck a deal with the ______ (insert your noun) , you made out better

They will receive the great part of it, yes. Token funds are spread about but generally, liberal ridings get the most. https://www.theglobeandmail.com/news/politics/infrastructure-funds-benefit-federal-liberal-ridingsmost/article37936209/

Yeah OK. Your truth and millions of others thruths. "spreading disinformation is what makes you tick." is self describing of you

No, I said " you vote local and that local candidate is not on the winning team, then your riding gets zero. " and that is a fact. If you voted conservative and your riding is conservative, and the party that wins is Liberal, your chance of getting any government help for anything, is practically zero, provincially or federally. My riding always seems to be on the losing party coattails and it stagnates. You see it in the legislature, opposition gets no airtime , respect or benefits.

What a lot of words to what end? I know what you think and I think I don't care. I think I said that before but here you are again to do what, convince me that I should think your way? Well, no way . I think that you think I said something yet, you hold no reference to that. I think you think wrongly. I think I know what I think. I think you should just stop trying to make me a clone of you or convince me to think like you . I don't like you , let alone what you stand for. ?

OK, not a quest, then a gesture, then a principal, then a posture. Point was and is that you vote local and that local candidate is not on the winning team, then your riding gets zero. If you vote to get things done or things for your riding, then you need to vote strategically.

While a noble quest, in the Canadian parliamentary system, a vote for a nondescript party or candidate helps neither Canada nor your local riding. A lone MP has little, if any, chance of doing and getting anything done. They basically get a 4 year vacation (expenses paid and 22 flights home a year) in Ottawa at your expense. As far as PP, I am not sure what he is promoting lately. He does a lot of talking and not sure what the real position is.

HA HA HA Cannot take the fact I don't care about your opinion. Rest assured, when you say something foolish and unsubstantiated though, I will let you know

Chuckle. I could not have expected a more closed minded response.

Yup I think I know what I think. No wait, I know what I think, it is you that is confused.

Off meds??

Yup.

C'mon, face it. Some of ya are like old folks in an old folks home. Ya cannot be taught anything new. Set in your ways. Don't have to prove yourself because you think you always know and are always right. The only drugs are the ones you take to keep your minds closed and fuzzy. Oh and, by the way, still no answers from you. You make an accusation and yet, you cannot back it up....Typical.

Says the most obtuse poster on this forum LOL HA HA HA. Most people?? HA! Only by a select few old timers that do not like to be challenged. The ones challenged and can never back up thier comments. Like you