ExFlyer

As I said in an earlier post, so narcissistic. All about you LOL Oh and I respect Army Guy . He and I have had numerous respectful discussions. And we do not always agree with each other but mutual respect keeps discussions civil. He would never stoop so low as to search out 50 past posts and give them down arrows out of spite, like you.

Your RSM and whomever is left would be aghast at your display of anger, disrespect and outright rudeness. There would be disciplinary action coming your way if the regiment was alive and you were actually a member. You clearly have nothing going for you in your life other than the simple short time you served in the past. You are a disgrace and you dishonour all ex and serving members of the Military

Well Dougie, you hit the low of the lowest. The coward is actually you. Pissed off because I call you out as you are and your petty vengeance is shown by searching out my posts and giving me 50 down arrows. Pretty sad and feeble. Abuse of a system. Proves what kind of loser you truly are. LOL Your regiment would be ashamed of their former members behaviour. You disgrace and embarrass your former regiment.

and on and on and on and on......

And on and on and on and on and on Fortunately there is no Canadian Forces Policy about you or your blather LOL

Yup, once again all about you LOL

Yes.

Of course not LOL Awareness is not your strong suit..... in my opinion.

There ya go. You are what you are and what you make yourself be. Narcissistic. Not one post from you that is not about you LO Insult away LOL I know, you don't and, as you say "I simply speak for myself and recount my relevant experiences from 35 years of service in the Canadian Forces "

No personal insult at all, just an observation. Making predictions on what the report, due next February, is going to state is crystal ball gazing, not using a brain.

Not using that brain you say you have? Crystal ball gazing is not using it, that is for sure

You need to understand "your friend". he is so full of himself that he has no context for anything else. A full narcissistic person. Dare you oppose or have a different view point or different experience you get insulted and have to see his innumerable posts and video clops. I have become aware of his narcissism and take it for what it is. In my opinion, A small man cloistered somewhere and living in a past that becomes more and more each time he talks.

I am sure you have a brain so hopefully you will use it. I am not going to argue with you nor make predictions. i will wait and see the other peoples testimony. I do not see anyone "taking the fall" fro anyone. They are all being asked questions and responding under oath. Not sure what you are expecting from me except to tell you there is a lot of testimony to come and your crystal ball gazing is meaningless to me. I will wait till it is over and the report comes out to make my mind up.

How do you come to that conclusion? The testimony so far is what led up too the first weekend of the event. What it has, so far, established the disarray between the various enforcement agencies.

Incorrect. They were opened when the EMA was enacted on 14 and 15 Feb. Yes, the commission and inquiry it is about the necessity of the EMA but, the testimony is not there yet. Than me? It is not about my opinion. I am just watching and listening to the testimony and wanting to know who, what , when , where and why of the event by and from the actual people that were there every day.... not tictokers, fascetimers or tweeters making comments on forums. At lest 4 more weeks of questions and answers to come....from all sides.

On the contrary. If you have been watching, it must come clear to you that so far, the testimony is all about the first weekend and the assumed and predicted situations and plans. The events that first weekend happened after have not really been discussed so far. It is clear by Sloly's testimony that they never expected the protest to go beyond the first weekend. All agency plans were in line with that opinion. Yes, there have been opinions but they have been contradicted by various speakers. The only thing that has become obvious so far is the complete disconnection between the various enforcement agencies. So no, I do not or did not say police incompetence was the sole reason for invoking the EMA. It may have been a factor. Another factor, yet to be discussed is the border closure issues at 2 provinces. They may have been the driver but we do not know yet.

Sounds and reads like you perfected them LOL You certainly are a master berater

Not worth it. He is obsessed and is even more obsessed with trying to get everyone to see it his way LOL Like a flat earther.

Reading you guys stroking each other is "as pornographic as it sounds." LOL

New nuclear and hydro are the only way we can get our grid up to what we will need in the next decades. Making promises is old hat, like for all governments.... time to get shovels in the ground. Yes, there will be environmental impacts but, i would rather be warm in the winter and to be able to drive that electric car.

Are you off meds again??? LOL

I give to the Poppy Fund I support my Legion I do whatever I can to support all veterans of Canadian Military. I go to the Remembrance Day Parade in downtown Ottawa every year to pay my respect to memory of those that served in WW 1, WW II. (well, twice to National Military Cemetery at Beechwood, far and away the most moving of ceremonies). I also pay my respect to the Tomb of the Unknown Soldier. I also pay tribute to all those that honoured Canada by their Military service. I also pay respect to those serving today. I acknowledge all who served, not just within my Squadrons. They all served for their own reasons and deserve respect.

Au contraire, stating facts which you are incapable of absorbing LOL It is OK to be wrong... too bad you have made it a lifestyle LOL

I admit, I have not watched every minute of testimony but did see enough and followed on the recaps. to know what was said. So no, they did not say it wasn't necessary. Some said they were not sure it was needed. What is clear is that all 3 police agencies did not communicate and even the RCMP commissioner said so in emails to Ministers the day before they enacted EMA. The RCMP knew they were in trouble trying to enforce the area. The OPP said they had 24 tow companies that could tow vehicles but they also said those operators were scared of any aggressiveness that may occur and would rather not begin towing. With EMA, they had the protection. That was all in testimony this past week. All people charged (over 500) were charged under existing laws and bylaws. No narratives debunked as no one said anyone was charged with unlawful protest, not one official person.

You are clearly not watching the testimony.