Hudson Jones

Timm-eh! Let's take corn for example: GMO Corn has 14 ppm of Calcium and NON GMO corn has 6130 ppm. 437 X more. GMO corn has 2 ppm of Magnesium and NON GMO corn has 113ppm. 56 X more. GMO corn has 2 ppm of Manganese and NON GMO corn has 14ppm. 7X more. Source

I hope you understand that it's difficult for me to take what you say seriously when you try to justify and promote comments and ideas of a racist piece of sh*t like Pam Geller. Someone who most ethnic organizations, including Jewish groups distance themselves from. Someone who is backed by a racist terrorist organization like JDL. That said, I can believe the fear that you may have but usually, a lot of these race and ethnic based fears are unjustified. They stem from ignorance, misinformation and support-at-all-cost tribalism and zealotry. Are you talking about Bradford, England? How about some context that you can share? News pieces?

Can you share the names of these neighbourhoods?

You sound like a winner.

Pam Gellar called. She said she wants her quotes back.

What are you talking about? Young white people living with their parents don't vote. I like this meme made to explain reality to the old white people who vote conservative.

Stop denying the obvious. The Conservatives have a similar base as the Republicans: Old white people.

Yes. That's exactly what he did Bryan.

Here is a Prime Minister I could vote for:

I'm not an NDP supporter, but the many NDP supporters I have come across are mostly minorities and educated white people. The clueless people are those who complain about social programs while the party they blindly support practice socialism for corporations (huge tax breaks and payouts). Trying to draw a parallel between Mulcair's incident to the ugly situation unfolding in front of us is stupid.

It's to pay him back for all the campaigning he has done for the Cons. They owe him a lot and they thought they could get away with it.

It's usually old white people who vote for the Cons. Many old people have a terrible memory and they are especially moved by propaganda made to play with their heart strings.

Or not. Corruption and injustice wins again? Link Guatemala's constitutional court has overturned a genocide conviction against former dictator José Efraín Ríos Montt, throwing out all proceedings against him since a dispute broke out in April over who should hear it.

He's a hack: opposition leader Stephen Harper who told then-Liberal prime minister Jean Chretien that "we don't support any Senate appointments," called the Senate a "dumping ground for the favoured cronies of the prime minister" and said "Canadians ... are ashamed the prime minister continues the disgraceful, undemocratic appointment of undemocratic Liberals to the undemocratic Senate to pass all-too-often undemocratic legislation." Sadly, when Harper became prime minister, he continued the "disgraceful, undemocratic appointments" this time with "undemocratic" Conservatives. To date, 58 in total. As explained by The Hill Times, he's appointed several former party staffers: - Doug Finley: National campaign director in 2006 and 2008 - Don Plett: Former president of Conservative Party Council - Carolyn Stewart Olsen: Former press secretary to the prime minister - Stephen Greene: Former chief of staff to Preston Manning - Irving Gerstein: The Conservative Party's chief fundraiser He has also appointed failed Conservative candidates such as Claude Carignan, Josee Verner and Larry Smith. He's appointed visible minority candidates who seem to be expected to fundraise for the party within the ethnic communities. There's David Braley who, interestingly, donated $30,000 to Harper's leadership campaign in 2004. And then, of course, there's Duffy and Wallin. Some suggest that Duffy was chosen as a reward for publicly shaming then Liberal leader Stéphane Dion during the 2008 election. Wallin, like Duffy, is an active fundraiser for the party. Link

I like this guy. He'll clean up Ottawa:

How about the Heroic Western Colonialists Combat the East and innocent civilians:

Nothing to see here folks. Everything is peachy. Derek says move along.

Derek is trying. He's trying hard. When people try to excuse illegal actions and wrongdoings just for the sake of showing unconditional support for a team they've chosen, they damage their own credibility.

The study was challenged and what I posted was their response to the so-called debunking. They manage to respond to the questions with detailed analysis and information. The statement published by AAAS is a statement against labeling GMOs. There are thousands of different types of genetically modified organisms. Blanket statement to say GMOs are harmful or not harmful doesn't work since they're all so different and not enough research has been done on all of them to come to a conclusion. I care about the environment and I'm not against GMOs, but I do want untainted research to be done on them and for people to, instead of getting into us vs them fights, to analyze the research and the background of those who have conducted them.

Where is this "scientific consensus"? Simply saying it doesn't make it so. Like I said, one of the largest studies on certain GMO says that GMOs are harmful. Look up the link. Show me research that disputes the findings. How do you suppose I should react to laboratories that are funded by Monsanto? Pretend it's not? Of course their findings should be questioned since negative findings would harm their own company.

Not it doesn't. Here is reference to a large study done on specific GMOs that show an increase in cancer and the dangers involved. Of course, any study that shows negativity towards GMOs is attacked by well funded Monsanto "research" groups and well-funded politicians who try to discredit the studies. This is very similar to studies showing our impact on climate change, where large energy companies are funding their own research organizations and are using their enormous amount of money to lobby politicians in order not to harm their multi-billion dollar industry.

Blanket statements like "environmentalists care nothing for science" is an asinine comment. There are many types of environmentalists. Not all have the same beliefs, understanding and views. You have not given any convincing argument when it comes to GMOs, nuclear power, CO2 or pesticides. Once you do, then we can have a debate about it.

How can we have a conversation and why should anyone take you seriously with comments like that?

TimG is angry at the other team again.

He paid it back because there was no other choice, since he was caught. Who is "Harv", who is keeping his?