West

Its all related.. the hyperventalion of "covid" allowed them to pass ILLEGAL voting procedures. Just as Giuliani correctly pointed out

They claim there was a "switching of sides" specifically as Strom Thurmond opposed the Civil Rights bill. What they actually FAIL to acknowledge is that in many ways Strom Thurmond was before his time. He introduced several legislation in support of civil rights in the 1950s, and his business was one of the first to remove separate bathrooms in his store. Where the bogus "switched sides" argument came in and still remains to this day is that the Republican party became about preserving the Constitution and respected states rights whereas the Dummycrats wanted to centralize power.

It would take years to untangle the corruption that took place in 2020. The investigation into Anthony Fraudci will be a good start

Yea even as various elements of the mail in scam were deemed ILLEGAL they still claim that its a "conspiracy theory" to question the legitimacy of the 2020 election ?

Lol.. More like not get harassed because I don't like Joe

So Democrat propaganda outlets say so therefore true eh Though I do find these court cases interesting: "It references three court rulings: one by Wisconsin's Supreme Court, which ruled absentee ballot drop boxes during 2020’s COVID-19 lockdown measures were illegal, a ruling in Delaware in October that found mail-in-voting was unconstitutional, and a ruling by Pennsylvania's Supreme Court that the post wrongly claims struck down the expansion of unmanned mail-in-ballot drop boxes." TURNS OUT GUILIANI WAS RIGHT ALL ALONG. Will lefties apologize? The answer: not likely.

I have you just choose to remain stubborn.. just as you were when proven wrong about CRT only being taught in graduate law school. As I've already told you, I've sat in enough of those lectures to know they are just politically charged, racist in tone, divisive, grievance fests. If you disagree with anything in the curriculum, especially at the University level, they threaten you. Just a cesspool of racism and outrage

Cuts $70 billion in funding being used by Joe Gestapo to target political opponents. Maybe they should start with trimming the fat on politically charged programs. Hopefully the fbi is next

Hooray

So then sue the Democrat Party.. I dont get why a white person thousands of miles away and not even alive during that time is being lumped in with the Democrats of the 1960s. Democrat tactics haven't changed one iota. They are still going at people based on their race and religion. They just switched up which skin tone they find reprehensible now

Now that we've established that CRT is not just a masters level law course and is in fact being taught in school, to answer the question "what's wrong with CRT"? On its face, nothing is wrong with telling kids not to be dinks to others based on skin tone. The issue primarily lay with the embellishment within the theory. A very tiny percentage of white people owned slaves as an example, yet they want to attribute it to all white people. This then leads to the demand for reparations and unfair advantages based on skin tone. It all take away from personal responsibility. People can now act like dinks because they are "victims"

The j6 committee had a set narrative and only called witnesses that would tell them what they wanted. You might as well just wipe your backside with that report because that's all it is

By whom? Far left nut cases?

You'd think if the election really was legit democrats would want to prove it.. instead they resort to threats, intimidation and temper tantrums

CRT isn't just a theory, it's a way of life for the lefties

You LIE again.. Anybody who has taken any post secondary know this garbage is taught.

After three pages we FINALLY have come to the conclusion CRT IS NOT just for grad school law. Thank you. Now to answer your question, there are elements within the school system lefties have repackaged under a different name, buy is still CRT garbage. Thank you!

So basically you admit it's not just taught in grad school level law. The OP is a LIAR..

You asked me to provide you a text book.. how am I supposed to get access to a text book without buying one? We aren't playing your ridiculous games where you CHANGE THE RULES whenever you are shown yo be the LOSER you are

Yes there's already a link above that states it's its a SOCIAL theory as well.. Good grief do you losers EVER admit you are wrong?

We already have so STFU and READ what people write you dolt

So it's NOT just taught in graduate level law classes. Thanks for admitting you LIED.

Listen here little man.. I've sat in enough public school and university classes to know what's being taught. We all know you are lying ? and we shouldn't have to go spend hundreds of dollars on your religions literature to prove it. Especially when you won't accept THE TRUTH Anyway which you've already demonstrated by continuing to LIE about CRT only being a graduate level law course.

You clearly don't know what crt is as you LIE and say it's only taught in graduate level law classes.. We've already PROVEN that its a social theory found across the humanities.. We recognize the racist premise of CRT and can recognize that it's ugly head has crept in to the school system EVEN IF you try and rebrand the garbage as something else

They aren't serious in their discussions. They want me to go spend a hundred bucks on a school text book just to show some guy who clearly won't accept the facts that he's wrong lol