West

Yet you present the vox spin.. Facts are Democrat post term abortion, anything goes abortion policies are even too extreme for much of the left wing.

You rely on vox ?... Anyway, the Democrats have gone off the deep end. It's obvious the vast majority support some restrictions on abortion... Virginia just flipped red in large part because of Democrats extremist abortion position

It's no wonder you continue to spew garbage if these are your sources. If the people of Mississippi have issue with the legislation in this case, they can vote out those who passed it

The constitution accounts for that too. It's called voting. Democrats can't stand their policies are unpopular. Evidently it's them that want to take us back to the days of feudalism and monarchies

All of these are great debates for the local state level. You know that debate can be held at the state level. If you believe people whove had abortions should go to jail, you can run on that platform. If you think they shouldn't, you can run on that platform. Both of you can try and convince enough people to vote for you. Sure beats flying into hyperbolical fits of rage, threatening SC judges for disagreeing with you, and trying to ram unsavory policy through a body of unelected judges. I fully suspected that most states who do pass abortion legislation will account for legitimate health issues. To suggest otherwise is fear mongering and tbh is pathetic. Then again that's what democrats do... they lie non stop

You people are off your rocker. Kavanaugh et al are originalists. That was very clear in their hearings. Issues like abortion were decided at the state level for 150 years. Only until democrats couldn't actually pass anything did they start abusing the court. Thankfully this restores the basic fabric to the people

Do you think the federal government should be involved in, say, city zoning? The divide is philosophical differences. Republicans ironically are the one who believe choices are best made at the local/state level. Democrats want to rule from afar by dictating policy from Washington the people simply don't want

Right. They did take into account Roe, which states that limits can be placed on abortion, in making their decision on the case in front of them ?.. Dobbs v. Jackson put a limit on abortion AFTER 15 WEEKS and does not outright ban abortions. It doesn't make it a criminal offense to have an abortion (as was the case with Roe). As Roe acknowledges, there's no absolute right to an abortion Even the baby killers Ruth Bader Ginsburg said Roe had issues Left wing news gaslighting you yet again

Nope. If you actually bothered to read the Roe ruling you'd know they never determined an absolute right to an abortion therefore my example of speeding is fitting even if you don't understand it. And yes there are. Montana has no speed limits

You do realize that Roe never gave an absolute right to an abortion right? "The Court also held that the right to abortion is not absolute and must be balanced against the government's interests in protecting women's health and prenatal life." So how did they lie? The case here determines states can implement limitations on abortion.

That's bs and we all know it.

Not dumb at all. Both laws infringe on some aspects of your "liberty". Some states have no speed limits at all on freeways. You vote for people depending on what limits you want in society. Some don't want baby murder and can vote their conscience.

Only undoing the politicization of the court and restoring legislative authority back to the states. If you want to live in a state which allows baby murder, vote in politicians who support baby murder.

Probably because it's been 5-4 liberal activists vs. Originalists on the SC.. Barry politicized the court more than any other president in us history.. a litmus test for liberal causes... thats why loons like Hirono ask some vile questions

What about an atheist? Should they be court mandated to write "Jesus is the only way to heaven" on a cake for a Christian get together? So basically what you are saying is you only want the state to weigh in on issues YOU agree with.

No I'm not admitting that at all. The Roe decision was activist judges overstepping. By your logic I can claim my rights to liberty is being violated because I can't speed down the freeway

The second ammendment guarantees your right to bare arms. Some states (and for that matter the feds) have put in laws to curtail everything from automatic weapons to magazine capacity. The validity of said laws can be challenged under s. 14 of the constitution. As for abortion, the States can make their own law and the court determines whether or not each law is constitutional provided there are real cases...

Do you think a Jewish baker should have to make a cake with a swastika on it?

Show me the specific line in the constitution where women can kill their unborn child in utero Article 10 protects the state's rights to pass their own law. The federal government is not a superior level of government "The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people."

Oh yes it's Republicans fault because Barry couldn't pass laws and relied on the court instead. Companies can deny business to whoever they want. The free market will decide if their policy is a good thing or not. It's when government interferes in the shop owner's right to serve unmasked individuals and forces them to be mask police that there's issues

Misleading. Should be ruled as "false" on politifact

Very strange: The rights that are enshrined in the US constitution I.e states rights to pass their own laws, the 2nd ammendment the leftists don't support Rights not enshrined in the US constitution I.e baby murder they do support. Down is up, up is down with these folks. And they claim Republicans are damaging institutions...

Obama had close to a decade to fix it yet focused more time on who can pee in which bathroom and forcing a baker to make a cake against their will.

Overpriced forced insurance.. yes lovely.

This is a lie. They all said they wouldn't indicate how they'd rule on specific cases as it's improper to do so in a confirmation hearing.