Aristides

Not true, the SCOTUS ruling holds that states are free to do what they want on abortion. e Now that France is expanding women's rights and the US is intent on taking them away, maybe it is time to send the Statue of Liberty back. After all, it is a woman.

Trump hasn't set anything, he isn't in office. The SCOTUS said it is up to the states so he couldn't do anything even if he was president. No doctor will perform an abortion late in pregnancy except to save a woman's life. If suggesting we execute 18 year olds on a mother's whim isn't extreme, I don't know what is. It's f**king looney toons.

I think the opposite is true. Russia will not stop with Ukraine and China will not stop with Taiwan. They are already building artificial islands and claiming the whole South China Sea as territorial waters even though it borders the Philippines, Viet Nam and Indonesia.

So we now live in a world where people don't have the right to determine their own future? Is that what Reagan intended? Unlike the current GOP, I don't believe Reagan would have turned his back on Ukraine or Taiwan.

Nice of you not to give the people of Ukraine or Taiwan any say in the matter.

The problem with you guys is you always have to deal in extremes. That doesn't happen and never has. Doctors just won't do that.

Or on the other hand, they might start saying, sorry mate, you ain't getting any.

France makes abortion a constitutional right.

Democracy is an anathema to today's GOP.

A person would have to be nuts to want to be a teacher or doctor in the US these days.

What Trump says doesn't agree with facts. Quelle Surprise.

Maybe read the title of this topic before you say stupid stuff like this.

Sure. That must be why you have to talk about Pelosi on a thread about Boebert. It must be a win if God told her to do it. It would be a win but not for her. Maybe God is setting her up.

You can't seriously believe Boebert. Even you are not that gullible.

She never used God as an excuse for anything she has done.

So? The court decides if the argument is valid, not Trump and to do that it has to go before a judge. Trump is asking for immunity from the consequences of criminal behaviour.

God made me do it is the last resort of a scoundrel.

It’s a court that decides if you have a valid legal argument or whether a charge is valid, not you, Trump or any other defendant.

So Trump claiming there is no basis so there is no trial is all you need to know. Wow, who knew getting out of being charged could be so simple. See how well that works if you get charged with something.

Trials aren't random, if there is no basis to charge, the court will not hear them. Someone who is charged doesn't get to decide the outcome. If Trump does get immunity, Biden or any future president will have the same immunity, or are you saying Trump should be the only president that gets to be immune? That sounds like a dictatorship to me.

We have trials to determine innocence and guilt, defendants don't get to do it by themselves. Trump says he is innocent so you say he is innocent, no need to go any farther according to you.

He want's and exemption so he can get away with anything without being held accountable. Trials determine guilt or innocence, not the defendants.

Ya, he's unbiased, a convicted felon who was pardoned by Trump. 🤣. Trump is telling you otherwise. So why is he demanding exemption from any crimes he commits when in office?

Hungary approves Sweden NATO membership. Well done Vlad.

The Federalist