BeaverFever

Wrong. Anyone who will believe far-fetched implausible zero-evidence conspiracy theories espoused by their leader is a cultist Anyone who believes that the only news that can be trusted is “news”that is endorsed by the leader himself and that only supports the leader’s position is a cultist. Anyone who who constantly praises their leaders “greatness” in all things while refusing to admit the leader has ever made any mistakes or has shortcomings is a cultist. Anyone who twists themselves into knots trying to parrot the ever-changing self-contradicting and gaslighting arguments of their is a cultist. The people who carried out the Jan 6 attack on the Capitol are cultists and so are the apologists Only Trump supporters fit the above description. Nobody on this site or on the left in general worships Trudeau or Biden but Trump supporters WORSHIP Trump. Its is as cultist as it gets.

It’s just the most absurd of lies coming from you, the guy who’s never right about anything including the fact that he’s never right about anything.

Hey ACTUAL King of Wrong you have no clue what my post was referring to. Maybe you have Alzheimers also? You fail again

There were no top secret files at Mar-a-Lago There were top secret files Mar-a-Lago but they were planted by the FBI There were top secret files at Mar-a-Lago that Trump kept there but he had declassified them There were top secret files at Mar-a-Lago and they weren’t declassified but the FBI had seen (and gone through) those boxes before and said Trump could hang onto them as long as they had extra security. Trump had put an extra lock on the room containing them. The FBI were satisfied. The lies keep evolving by the minute. As for your claim that the Nazis issued receipts all you did was name-drop a confiscation program but nowhere do you provide any proof that receipts were issued. Got a link?

He’s wrong all the time. Claim’s he’s right is just part if the gaslighting you extremists have normalizes since the start of the trump cult.

Yeah sure that walking punchline conspiracy whack job will come riding to the rescue. Right after she takes down those Jewish space lasers and the “gazpacho”. I wonder if her pro-pedophile unpaid intern Milo will be there to assist her.

Notice that @Infidel Dog suddenly dropped the subject like a hot potato , proving once again the whenever he says “king of wrong” he it’s a sure sign he’s he’s getting his ass owned and turning desperate

3 lies, including equating Trump’s treatment with Jews during the holocaust. Have you no shame?

So I guess it’s a total coincidence that people were publicly speculating that he had dementia for years before he was officially diagnosed. Riiight. Amazing. Democrats seem to be really good at predictions.

Lie

Lie

It makes perfect sense. Trump has always been an impulsive person who does whatever he feels like doing in the moment without giving a moments thought to what the rules might be or making sure they’re followed. He had a momentary impulse to take them so he took them. End of story. So far none of the documents from the 15 boxes he already returned earlier this year (only after repeated requests and warnings of legal consequences)were marked “declassified” as is the usual process and there’s no record anywhere of Trump officially declassifying anything.

That’s his official story of course but its not a coincidence that he conveniently only gets diagnosed after leaving office despite years public speculation during the final years of his administration about his mental capacity. Headlines such as “Is Reagan Senile?” were circulating since 1987 and he was very confused am incoherent when testifying about his administration’s Iran-Contra scandal in 1990. And then there’s this: Ronald Reagan had Alzheimer’s while president, says son https://amp.theguardian.com/world/2011/jan/17/ronald-reagan-alzheimers-president-son And this Reagan Aides Once Raised the Possibility of Invoking the 25th Amendment White House staff reportedly said that Reagan was inattentive and acting strangely, but his chief of staff dismissed the possibility of trying to remove him. The president was acting strangely. In the wake of a scandal about his illegal dealings with foreign powers, White House aides felt he was so “inattentive and inept” that a memo sent to the chief of staff raised the prospect of invoking the 25th Amendment to remove him from office. https://www.history.com/.amp/news/reagan-health-25th-amendment When Did Reagan's First Signs of Alzheimer's Appear? In My Father at 100, Ron Reagan writes of a "growing sense of alarm over his father's mental condition." He recalls the presidential debate with Walter Mondale, October 1984, in which his father seemed lost and unable to articulate himself. In "Ronald Reagan had Alzheimer's while president, says son," a short piece on the fracas by the British Guardian, Ron Reagan is quoted as saying: "My heart sank as he floundered his way through his responses, fumbling with his notes, uncharacteristically lost for words. He looked tired and bewildered." Other observers and commentators have noted how often Reagan confused films he'd made with political reality, including telling witnesses about concentrationcamps he'd helped to liberate in World War II, when the humbler truth was rather that he had made a movie or two about the topic. https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/side-effects/201101/when-did-reagans-first-signs-alzheimers-appear?amp

Dude that makes no sense. They go to war with people they make business deals with? Also Hunter was supposed to he conspiring with Ukraine and Zelensky You’ve got your crackpot conspiracies all screwed up. As point of fact it was Trump and his people who had deals up the wazoo with Russia. Why would Putin attack Trump when Trump was his faithful servant helping Putin undermine NATO and Europe and trying to end sanctions against Russia? If you want to know how much Putin “respected” Trump all you have to do is watch the smirk on Putin’s face in Helsinki as he stood there while Trump licked his Russian balls and fawned over how “powerful” Putin is and how he believes Putin over Americans

Your claim of fake news is the fake news

FACT: It was during, not after his presidency.

As a private citizen advising the President

In Republican Bizarro world, standing up to Putin’s aggression is like Neville Chamberlain while REPUBLICANS admitting to being an actual Putin supporter saying they side with Russia against the USA is somehow like Churchill.

I’m not comparing them with nazism, you just can’t grasp the obvious hole in your own argument which you can’t even see with your ideological blinders on Now you’re changing your tune and suggesting that there ARE in fact some ideas that should be disqualified even if they are “powerfully written persuasive piece?” Your earlier comment didn’t suggest that you draw the line anywhere But you DO draw a line then? Answer the question its yes or no. Please clarify Your childish accusations of what you claim I believe in and find offensive are also wrong, And your pivot to personal attack just shows you’re frustrated and flustered.

Fake news! Democrats and Liberals openly disagreewith and criticize each other including their leaders like Biden and Trudeau all the time. On any given day it’s in the “mainstream media” all the time I disregard what far right extremists say but that doesn’t mean I assume anything critical is from far right extremists On the other hand, Republicans only listen to right-wing sources and claim any inconvenient facts or opinions are part of some vast liberal conspiracy that involves all the world’s sources of non-right information and governments, including some of their fellow Republicans who are unfortunate enough to be deemed insufficiently extremist “RINOs” on any given day or topic

1) Some are, some aren’t and some do and some don’t. You’re making overly broad generalizations with no evidence to back up your claims (as usual). And allowing some people to have a choice isn’t “forcing” anything on people who don’t want that choice. As a fascist you don’t understand that, I know. You fascists believe that if you can’t impose your will on others, your rights are being infringed. Let me dumb it down for you: Personally I hate pineapple on pizza but allowing YOU to have it if you wish doesn’t “force” anything on me. Get it? 2) “Frivolous abortions” lmao you kill me. In woman-hating mind, anything after fertilization is “frivolous” unless you’ve been raped in the last 10 weeks ONLY….so at 11 weeks that 10-yr old rape victim is a “frivolous” slut. And abortions are allowed if a panel of anti-abortionist appointees agree you’re about to die in the first 20 weeks of pregnancy…But if any of those fetal health tests that can’t even be conducted before 20 weeks say its a fatal pregnancy and you get your results at 20 weeks plus a day, you’re a “frivolous” c-nt for wanting to live. But yeah keep claiming they didn’t “almost entirely ban” anything. LMAO your arguments are pathetic.

You didn’t answer the question.

Hilarious opposite-of-reality from the Big Lie follower who believes zero-evidence conspiracy theories and thinks Trump and Republicans are infallible gods who are not to be questioned

1) what do you base that claim on What restrictions do claim “Democrats” want anyways? 2) Wrong. Indiana banned all abortions, commencing at ZERO weeks, except in 3 very limited circumstances.

What about a “powerfully written persuasive piece” arguing that Bin Laden was right to carry out 9/11 or Hitler was right to carry out the holocaust? Would you give a prize for that?