Jump to content

BeaverFever

Senior Member
  • Posts

    7,486
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    35

Everything posted by BeaverFever

  1. So just to be clear you’re falling down a hole over this line from the OP? Where is Kirk or Owens or TPU Nazis? Dude your reading comprehension really sucks Stop and think about this for a second don’t make me explain it to you
  2. You don’t know what the hell you’re even talking about. Byrd was not a nazi and you don’t know a single thing about him. You’ve seen lame Republican memes about his affiliations when he was as a southern youth in the 1940s (which he renounced and denounced for decades afterwards) that mislead you into thinking you know something. But you’re completely ignorant of the mam and his politics., which spans more than 60 years. You don’t wear it well at all you wear it like an unhinged Putin-supporting conspiracy crackpot. You have absolutely NO moral base you’re just filled with hatred and vileness Have you forgotten your Christmas message already? If you had even a drop of common sense you wouldn’t be such a gullible unquestioning sucker for all these absurd right wing conspiracies and obvious kremlin propaganda
  3. What kind of range is needed for anti-ship missiles? Seems comparable to the Seahawk and Wildcat which both carry missiles
  4. What you say is all factually true but at the same time the pattern never changes. US pretty much never buys major “foreign” aircraft or vehicle fleets, even when a US wrapper like Lockheed is put on them pledging to create US jobs etc. and people point out that the “American” company also makes components all over the worls. Even when those foreign companies win a competition suddenly there’s a glitch in the matrix and they end up losing. I don’t think it really comes down to jobs or where components are made it’s about how much the companies who own the US politicians will benefit Everyone knows that if you choose the “US1010” some of that money is going to Europe as it’s their design. If we assume Boeing and LM both have equal influence over politicians, but Boeing stands to benefit by a billion dollars while LM only benefits half that because the rest is going to Europe, I think politicians will gravitate to Boeing.
  5. That’s always the question with the MAGAs. They have low intelligence generally and also low morals. They are easily fooled but also have no reservations about blatantly lying when they know they’re wrong.
  6. I ) You are spouting your own fake news lies and opinions that you wish to be true amd calling anyone eho doesn’t agree with you a liar. Republicans have proven themselves to be nothing but a constant lie machine 2) Yeah kissing and hugging the flag is disrespectful which why you have never seen anyone else do it ever, not even the most over the top patriots God Bless the USA isn’t vulgar it’s just a hokey show tune even more notable because they didn’t bother to play the actual national anthem. 3) You are so dumb. It’s not “fake news” the article has phot and video of the Nazis there. But it shows how conservatives when confronted with the irrefutable facts and evidence just scream “fake news”. What hilarious is that your cult-addled uneducated brain thinks “CPAC called it fake news” is the same as saying “it was proven to be fake news” instead of the obvious which is CPAC is lying because they was caught red handed and gave their usual generic unoriginal denial
  7. Wah wah you nazi apologist. You just don’t like your cult being being called out for what is. The Republican Party has basically become the Tatooine town in the first Star Wars movie , a magnet for every grifter and vile deplorable to n the country
  8. YepI have no quarrel with the EH/AW 101. Lockheed was the wrapper on the Airbus MRTT too but I think everyone knows those aircraft aren’t “really” American.
  9. The Russians snatched defeat from the jaws of victory. 2 years ago their invasion force had them on the outskirts of Kyiv, then their incompetence and corruption lead to that that loooong retreat which they still haven’t been able to reverse
  10. Nazis mingle openly at CPAC, spreading antisemitic conspiracy theories and finding allies The presence of these extremists has been a persistent issue at CPAC, and in previous years conference organizers have ejected well-known Nazis and white supremacists such as Nick Fuentes. NATIONAL HARBOR, Md. — Nazis appeared to find a friendly reception at the Conservative Political Action Conference this year. Throughout the conference, racist extremists, some of whom had secured official CPAC badges, openly mingled with conference attendees and espoused antisemitic conspiracy theories. The presence of these individuals has been a persistent issue at CPAC. In previous years, conference organizers have ejected well-known Nazis and white supremacists such as Nick Fuentes. But this year, racist conspiracy theorists didn’t meet any perceptible resistance at the conference where Donald Trump has been the keynote speaker since 2017. At the Young Republican mixer Friday evening, a group of Nazis who openly identified as national socialists mingled with mainstream conservative personalities, including some from Turning Point USA, and discussed “race science” and antisemitic conspiracy theories. One member of the group, Greg Conte, who attended the deadly 2017 Unite the Right rally in Charlottesville, Virginia, said that his group showed up to talk to the media. He said that the group was prepared to be ejected if CPAC organizers were tipped off, but that never happened. Another, Ryan Sanchez, who was previously part of the Nazi “Rise Above Movement,” took photos and videos of himself at the conference with an official badge and touted associations with Fuentes. In a photo published on his X profile, Sanchez shook hands with Jared Taylor inside CPAC's secure conference area, writing "Jared Taylor is a hero of our people!" Taylor founded American Renaissance, an organization that has published racist, pro-eugenics writings. The Southern Poverty Law Center describes Taylor as "crudely white supremacist." In another video, Sanchez can be seen in the lobby of the conference hotel giving a Nazi salute. Other attendees in Sanchez’s company openly used the N-word.… https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/nazis-mingle-openly-cpac-spreading-antisemitic-conspiracy-theories-fin-rcna140335?utm_campaign=atlantic-daily-newsletter&utm_source=newsletter&utm_medium=email&utm_content=20240226&lctg=6050e8f4f98ec7553cc03c84&utm_term=The Atlantic Daily Trump Delivers Another Autocratic Tirade But many Americans seem to have gotten used to it. …The former president’s speech was full of falsehoods, but more important, it was yet another fascistic rant, full of fear, rambling half-thoughts, delusions, and, of course, threats. “Our country is being destroyed,” Trump warned. “And the only thing standing between you and its obliteration is me.” .. Trump began his CPAC appearance with his signature vulgarity of hugging and kissing an American flag, after which he stood at respectful attention not for the national anthem but for Lee Greenwood’s “God Bless the U.S.A.,” which is close enough at a Trump event, and always a crowd-pleaser. And speaking of the audience: In previous years, CPAC apparently tried to screen out neo-Nazis and white nationalists and supremacists, but this year, members of such groups were observed wearing badges and, as NBC reported, they “appeared to find a friendly reception.” (CPAC has called the NBC report “fake news.”) And so, to recap: A former president of the United States went off on an autocratic soliloquy—happily ditching his teleprompter for some of it—to a group that included self-identified Nazis. He again warned that he was the singular figure, the “last chance” standing between ordinary citizens and that “bloodshed, chaos, and violent crime” that he claims has now arrived at the hands of roving gangs of terrorists and criminals. At the ballot box, he said, “they” will get a “reckoning, like they haven’t even imagined before. We’re gonna straighten out our country,” he said. Who is “they”? you might wonder. “They” are the people, it seems, who do not support Donald Trump, the fellow American citizens who are in his eyes “vermin” and whom he referred to at CPAC as “thugs and tyrants and fascists, scoundrels, and rogues.” Meanwhile, he decried the incarceration of the “hostages” who are serving time for the January 6 insurrection, claiming that “there’s never been in the history of our country a group of people treated the way they’ve been treated.” Every dictator needs a loyal corpus of people willing to do violence on his behalf, and Trump seems to think he has such brigades, biding their time and stewing in federal prisons, merely awaiting his return. He may well be right. For now, however, too many Americans seem oddly disconnected from these and other authoritarian plans Trump continues to share so openly and candidly. … https://www.theatlantic.com/newsletters/archive/2024/02/trump-cpac-speech-autocratic/677577/?utm_campaign=atlantic-daily-newsletter&utm_source=newsletter&utm_medium=email&utm_content=20240226&utm_term=The+Atlantic+Daily
  11. It’s probably another of Trump’s many fake stories. I doubt anyone ever asked him that.
  12. Yeah like I said it wasn’t expected to he an orphan when we chose it. But when we skimped on missiles and buggered the contract for over a decade we didn’t impress anyone else to buy it. VH-92 complications have been worked out it seems, it will fully assume all presidential transport responsibilities this year Sikorsky VH-92A Patriot to take over Marine One mission completely by 2024 https://www.aerotime.aero/articles/sikorsky-vh-92a-marine-one-2024/amp The EH101 version named VH-71 Kestrel also had delays, performance and cost overrun problems Besides there is no way the US military would ever let the POTUS fly in a European helicopter over an American one. It’s like when the proven Airbus MRTT won the USAF KC-135 replacement competition, the Air Force just redid the competition and them awarded the contract to an unproven and less capable Boeing aircraft that’s plagued with deficienciesbb
  13. Of course not, he’s a multimillionaire. He even grew up fairly rich so has no frame of reference for these things.
  14. Hilarious because here that’s not considered fancy or desirable, that’s just mostly at the low-end grocery stores. I expected him to next say “the aspirin and diapers are kept in a locked cabinet, you have to ask the staff for a key! Amazing!” The shopping cart escalator that “he just figured out” is not special either. Multi-floor grocery stores in downtown city centres have them. I know of a few here in Toronto.
  15. Not Putin. A stalemate on this battlefield = Russia loses. Besides, his original goal was to conquer all Ukraine which he has failed to do. And will not do. The best he can hope for is to hold on to what he’s got long term as a foreign occupying army which is not cheap in blood or treasure. Russia’s economy is smaller than Canada’s it cannot continue to bleed hundreds of thousands more men and hundreds of billions of dollars indefinitely, especially while under sanctions. Something’s gotta give eventually even if Ukraine cannot dislodge them on the battlefield. .
  16. You never provided a single source for any of the BS you spew here daily while at the same time demanding a library full of sources for anything you dislike and still claim it’s inadequate. Typical MAGA troll. And it’s quite obvious YOU LITERALLY HAVE NO F-CKING CLUE what happened in that election you don’t even have a version of events, just baseless insults. You couldn’t even begin to tell me how you think Gore tried to steal the election you uneducated mor*n. But ok I’ll bite here are the published accepted historical facts, not that a vulgar troll like you have the intellectual curiosity to even read it much less understand it And we both know you’re not mentally capable of accepting information that’s inconvenient to your ideology anyway but here’s me once again taking the high road over an unwashed bottom-feeder like you. It’s why I’m the good guy and you’re an Orc from Lord if the Rings 1) FLORIDA LAW, NOT AL GORE REQUIRED THE RECOUNT; The Florida election was closely scrutinized after Election Day. Due to the narrow margin of the original vote count, Florida Election Code 102.141 mandated a statewide machine recount,[5] which began the day after the election. It was ostensibly completed on November 10 in the 66 Florida counties that used vote-counting machines and reduced Bush's lead to 327 votes.[4][6] According to legal analyst Jeffrey Toobin, later analysis showed that a total of 18 counties—accounting for a quarter of all votes cast in Florida—did not carry out the legally mandated machine recount, but "No one from the Gore campaign ever challenged this view" that the machine recount had been completed.[7] 2) AL GORE WAS ENTITLED TO REQUEST A MANUAL NOT MACHINE RECOUNT UNDER FLORIDA LAW Following the machine recount, the Gore campaign requested a manual recount in four counties. Florida state law at the time allowed a candidate to request a manual recount by protesting the results of at least three precincts.[10] 3) JEB’S FLORIDA OFFICIALS CONVENIENTLY FAILED TO ABIDE BY FLORIDA LAW AND COMPLETE THE RECUNT BY THE LEGALLY REQUIRED DEADLINE AND TRIED TO STOP THE RECOUNT Florida statutes also required that all counties certify and report their returns, including any recounts, by 5:00 p.m. on November 14. The manual recounts were time-consuming, and it soon became clear that some counties would not complete their recounts before the deadline. On November 13 the Gore campaign and Volusia and Palm Beach Counties sued to have the deadlines extended.[13] Meanwhile, the Bush campaign worked to stop the recount. On November 11, it joined a group of Florida voters in suing in federal district court for a preemptive injunction to stop all manual recounting of votes in Florida. 4) VARIOUS LAWSUITS AND COURT ORDERS STOPPED AND RECOUNTS ALL OVER THE STATE, WITH REPUBLICANS TRYING TO PREVENT RECOUNTS AND DEMOCRATS TRYING TO START THEM AGAIN (Described in detail over multiple paragraphs I will not try to repost here) 5) IN NARROW 4-3 VOTE, SUPREME COURT RULES IN FAVOUR OF BUSH TO STOP RECOUNTING TO “AVOID IRREPARABLE HARM TO BUSH” The U.S. Supreme Court convened on December 1 to consider Bush's appeal. On December 4, the Court ordered the Florida Supreme Court to clarify its ruling that had extended the certification date. On December 9, the Court suspended the manual recount, in progress for only several hours, on the grounds that irreparable harm could befall Bush, according to a concurring opinion by Justice Antonin Scalia. Meanwhile, on December 6 the Republican-controlled Florida legislature convened a special session to appoint a slate of electors pledged to Bush, as the U.S. Constitution bestows upon state legislatures the duty to determine how its state's electors are appointed. On December 12, the same day as the U.S. Supreme Court ruling, the Florida House approved awarding the state's electoral votes to Bush, but the matter was moot after the Court's ruling. Some have argued that awarding the electors in this manner would be illegal.[15] On December 13, Gore conceded the election to Bush in a nationally televised address.[16][17] 6) JEB BUSH RECOUNTED VOTES IN REPUBLICAN DISTRICTS WHILE FIGHTING RECOUNTS IN DEMOCRATIC ONES While the Bush campaign opposed the Gore campaign's requests for manual recounts in four heavily Democratic counties, they quietly accepted manual recounts from four Republican-leaning counties. Polk, Hamilton, Seminole, and Taylor Counties, which used the more reliable optical scanners, decided to manually examine unreadable ballots (both undervotes and overvotes) during the counties' electronic recounts, in accordance with those counties' existing policies (see County-by-county standards below). These manual counts garnered Bush a net gain of 185 votes.[23] 5) IF ALL VOTES IN THE STATE HAD BEEN RECOUNTED (SOMETHING GORE NEVER ASKED FOR) GORE WOULD HAVE WON CNN and PBS reported that, had the recount continued with its existing standards, Bush would likely have still tallied more votes, but variations of those standards (and/or of which precincts were recounted) could have swung the election either way. They also concluded that had a full recount of all undervotes and overvotes taken place, Gore would have won, though his legal team never pursued such an option.[74][75][76] The National Opinion Research Center at the University of Chicago, sponsored by a consortium of major U.S. news organizations, conducted the Florida Ballot Project, a comprehensive review of ballots collected from the entire state, not just the disputed counties that were recounted.[77]. ., Based on the NORC review, the media group concluded that if the disputes over the validity of all the ballots in question had been consistently resolved and any uniform standard applied, the electoral result would have been reversed and Gore would have won by 60 to 171 votes (with, for each punch ballot, at least two of the three ballot reviewers' codes being in agreement). The standards that were chosen for the NORC study ranged from a "most restrictive" standard (accepts only so-called perfect ballots that machines somehow missed and did not count, or ballots with unambiguous expressions of voter intent) to a "most inclusive" standard (applies a uniform standard of "dimple or better" on punch marks and "all affirmative marks" on optical scan ballots).[4] An analysis of the NORC data by University of Pennsylvaniaresearcher Steven F. Freeman and journalist Joel Bleifuss concluded that, no matter what standard is used, after a recount of all uncounted votes, Gore would have been the victor.[37] https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/2000_United_States_presidential_election_recount_in_Florida
  17. He did more than that he presented Russian propaganda and couldn’t bring himself to ask even one tough question or challenge even one of Putin’s dubious claims. He even produced a little video segment where he tried to falsely make it seem like poverty-riddn, crime-infested Russia is a paradise by filming bits in the ONE nice area where all the businesses and rich oligarchs go. “The grocery store locks up their shopping carts so homeless people don’t steal them! Isn’t that amazing?” “Trust me this loaf of bread I’m sniffing smells better than American bread!” “This ONE subway station is nicer than American subway stations!” Jon Stewart aptly describes Tucker’s hack job Even Family Guy’s depiction of Russia is more realistic
  18. Yes sorry I stand corrected after 13 years of true balanced budgets under Chretien/Martin, Harper inherited rhat and blew it all after year 2. Not that I think balanced budgets are so great, we’ve now had 2 generations of austerity with underfunded schools, hospitals, military, crumbling infrastructure, etc. Under Harper we got the same austerity and underfunding as Chretien/Martin while also running more deficits… No. That had nothing to do with it. Those GST cuts occurred before the Great Recession anyway. We didn’t have a financial meltdown because our financial sector is well regulated there, was no subprime mortgage crisis here, commodity prices wee booming, and the Fed cut interest rates to near zero to juice the economy. No mention of GST in any account of the Great Recession I can find, which makes sense because Canadian economic challenges were due to decreasing exports as the rest of the world suffered, not decreasing domestic consumer demand.
  19. Another fact-check : HALO Trust is a global charity that helps train locals to safely clear landmines. ONE of their programs is specifically aimed at training local women but they also train men. As for your claim that “Trudeau insisted” that appears to be made up by you.
  20. Just a point of fact: Harper NEVER balanced the books (His final budget doesn’t count as he avoided a defeat for the first time by basically doing the equivalent of taking money out of your RRSP to buy groceries). No conservative in modern times ever has. Perhaps if he hadn’t lost billions in revenue by cutting the GST he might have. pulled it off, but his choice just goes to show he wasn’t really “obsessed” with balancing the books
  21. I agree can’t be a launch customer for any product. To your question though, USAF, and USMC, USCG, German Navy, all looked at it. USMC purchased 21 aircraft +2 more for testing, designated VH-92 that will fully takeover presidential duties this year. It’s also a militarized version of the H-92 superhawk but still probably very different than the Cyclone. As I understand it: Because the CH-148 Cyclone was an adaptation of a successful civilian aircraft and large US/foreign orders were also anticipated at the time it was expected to be a simple implementation. But meeting the RCAF’s requirements especially the folding tail proved challenging. Plus in addition to the cyclone being a small fleet with these bespoke features not necessarily valued by other countries, we cheaped out on other capabilities. it was only ever designed to carry torpedoes when at a minimum anti-ship missiles should have been included as this is pretty much a core feature of most maritime combat aircraft and ASW helicopters. Despite the horrendously excessive amounts of time and money spent developing and delivering the Cyclone, AFAIK the helicopter that is flying today is highly capable and well regarded by the crews that use it, except for lack of additional weapons like missiles. Initial problems with tail cracking and autopilot have been addressed to my knowledge and no new ones have emerged. I’m not saying it was the right choice to purchase but we’re not currently flying a lemon, just a very expensive orange that took a very long time to ripen. And now the fleet is approaching mid life upgrade despite not reaching full delivery and nobody has planned for it.
  22. Well at the time we didn’t think we’d be the only ones. The Cyclone is American made and meant to a larger version of the widely used Seahawk. The civilian version of the cyclone is also widely used. The alternatives of this size category are European NH-90 and EH/AW-101 which at the time had their own troubling technical problems Canada is just a bad launch customer for any military product.
  23. Yes we should be. Reluctance nowadays is due to cost mostly and historically a fear of anything with the word “nuclear” in it, especially if it’s related to the military. Assuming Canada stays in the submarine business after the current submarines are done, my guess is that we will pursue “Air Independent Propulsion” subs rather than nuke. AIP use tech like hydrogen fuel cells so can operate under ice but currently they can only stay submerged for a few weeks vs nukes which in theory can remain submerged indefinitely
  24. As point of fact: -Helicopters that got cancelled: Mulroney deal cancelled by Chretien. New deal awarded under Harper with major flaws we area still dealing with - fighters that got canceled: we are buying larger numbers than under Harper - many of the new capabilities acquired for Afghanistan like air defence, Leopard 2 tansy and TOW were discontinued or put in ling term storage by Harper gov
  25. A right wing opinion piece peddling more of your garbage. People like you have no grasp of the facts and you rely on partisan opinion pieces for information to tell you only what you want to hear What I said was 100% accurate. A recount in Florida was MANDATORY because the vote was so close. Florida governor Jeb Bush only wanted to recount the districts where he thought Republicans would win. Gore wanted a different set of districts recounted . So they went to court because the law was unclear on how the recount would happen. The court’s ruled the governor can recount any way he wishes. Gore conceded even though he disagreed he respected the rule of law. LIKE A MAN. And unlike Trump A later audit found that if all the districts had been recounted Gore would have won. (Note: Gore had not asked for all districts to be recounted).
×
×
  • Create New...