Legato

There are many people that like cats.

How are the cherries you picked? More than 33 churches have been destroyed or heavily damaged by arson in Canada since May 2021, with over 100 Christian churches targeted by arson or vandalism in total. The majority of these incidents followed the announcement of potential unmarked graves at former residential schools, with many fires occurring on First Nations reserves. Key details regarding church fires in Canada: Timeline: The surge in church fires began around June 2021 following the announcement of potential grave discoveries at former residential schools. Arrests: While dozens of churches were destroyed, only a limited number of arrests have been made in connection with the arsons. Total Affected: According to a CBC News investigation, 33 churches were destroyed or severely damaged by fire between May 2021 and early 2024. Arson Statistics: Out of the 33 incidents reviewed by CBC, 24 were confirmed as arson, while only two were ruled accidental. Targeting: The Catholic Civil Rights League of Canada tracks these incidents, reporting over 85 Catholic churches specifically targeted, damaged, or destroyed by fire or vandalism since May 2021. Recent reports indicate a surge in incidents targeting synagogues and Jewish community institutions, primarily driven by protests surrounding the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. These incidents, described by officials as involving antisemitic rhetoric and intimidation, have occurred in several countries. You telling us that the Palestinian protesters are right wingers?

Oh dear, language fall back, poor dear.

Your game, now you want to take the ball home, go ahead it will be in your court.

Winning team? Do you mean the team led by the pied piper with all the rats following. NDP all voted and look what happened. Equity joke cards anyone. Lol

What fact?. No answer was the stern reply.

Thinking is generally outside your boundary, would that be a four or a six.

A solid. Very much feared by people like yourself and the Hollow man. How dare their opinions change after 15 years.

What fact?

He said and you fell for it. Well done.

Would be?

What fact?

No, which has has nothing to do with your assertion of not imininent.

Well one's a concept in your head and the other is a concept in your other head.

The relevant concept is unacceptable risk, not imminent threat. Do try to employ a little common snse.

The decision isn't to wait for perfect certainty, but to decide when a risk has become too dangerous to bear

Well, like before, I'm an optimist.

and he got one.