Jump to content

Infidel Dog

Senior Member
  • Posts

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won


Posts posted by Infidel Dog

  1. But again though, if not Michelle, who?

    Who in the Democratic party has a chance?

    It's tempting to say it doesn't matter because American elections are fixed but I'm not sure that will matter next time.

    I see grass roots and moneyed organizations forming on the right to counter early voting, Zuckerbuck style take overs of the voting process, elimination of the RINO vote counters such as we saw in Arizona and ballot box stuffing. 

    What I mean is, unless real Republicans' efforts are halted by the uniparty McConnelites Republicans will be ready for the Democrat dirty trick squads and the Dems will need to run a candidate with an actual chance.

    So if not an Obama, who?

  2. Actually Robo calling people stupid for considering Lomborg would be ignorant even for a warminista and that's pretty ignorant. It would be completely clueless though...so Robo would fit right in. That's his natural state.

    Bjorn Lomborg's credentials are perfectly adequate for what he's arguing. His position is not to be opposed to Global Warming. He believes in it. Unlike hard scientists like Lindzen, Spencer or Christie, he is a warmer. He believes in what they call "the science of human caused, crisis global warming."

    Bjorn Lomborg's position does not deal with that. Instead it says the economy and society in general will be farther ahead of the game by adapting to changes in the climate rather than expecting globalists and politicians to (or even can) fix the weather.

    • Like 1
  3. He's a master of the weaselly lie. The one that hides behind a little truth.

    Here's CNN doing one of the left's famous "Fact Checks" where they try to cover for a stream of lies concerning the transcript of Trump's phone call with the Ukrainian president. Shifty managed a failed impeachment attempt over that one. Pretty lame.


    We can’t endorse Trump’s claim that Schiff “lied,” since Schiff introduced his comments at Thursday’s committee hearing by saying he would be outlining “the essence of what the president communicates,” not providing “the exact transcribed version of the call.” And it’s important to note that we do not even have an “exact transcribed version” of the call – the rough transcript released by the White House cautions explicitly that it is “not a verbatim transcript.”

    Still, Schiff’s remarks did make it easy for viewers to get confused. He did not make clear which words he was taking directly from Trump’s comments in the rough transcript, which words were his own analysis, and which words were meant to be the comedic “parody” he later said he was intending.

    At some points, Schiff’s words strayed quite far from what the rough transcript showed Trump saying."

    In other words CNN, he lied. Just say it.

    • Like 1
  4. You wait until the decision comes down, do you, Contrarian?

    Well the decision on that one came down and Schiff lied. I have a theory why. It's because he's a liar. Adam Schiff was on CNN every day for years pushing stuff like the lie he had information that would soon reveal Trump was in collusion with Russia. The decision came down and he had nothing. He lied.


    • Like 1
  5. 4 hours ago, Contrarian said:

    Right Wing Troll Alert -->  

    Ha, that was mild. 

    I like my favourite right wing archive site. This one.

    Whenever they get a  Shifty Schiff story they don't use his name. They say the 'Bug-eyed, Burbank, Bolshevik.'

    I think every time we catch the left, or liars that are but say they aren't, in a lie we should tell them they're 'Talking Schiff."

    Because I don't think I've ever heard anything come out of the bug-eyed, Burbank, Bolshevik's mouth that wasn't a lie.

    • Like 2
    • Haha 1
  6. 28 minutes ago, eyeball said:

    I know, but there's nothing odd about rubber and glue when it's all you guys do. 

    I'd expect you to be used to that by now when all you've got to start a conversation with are insults.

    Don't want to be topped? Stop laying claim to the bottom.

    • Like 1
  7. 25 minutes ago, eyeball said:

    Maybe for as long as it takes to give your head a shake but only a simpleton would spend any time dwelling on them. 

    Oddly enough that's the way I feel about some of the nutty things you obsess over. But we already know yours turned out to be false. Still think the unvaccinated need to be mandated out of polite society but think the clot shot protects you from infection? Actually you should have pegged that one as illogical if not nutty when you were pushing it.

    • Like 4
    • Downvote 1
  8. 17 hours ago, robosmith said:

    In 2007 that was NOT illegal. "The Stock Act" passed almost unanimously and signed by Obama made it illegal in 2012.

    As I understand it the difference between the stock act and Josh Hawley's act is the Stock act pretty much just told congress insider trading was naughty and they shouldn't do that. Josh Hawley's act says flat out they can't trade stocks.

  9. Where's the evidence saying it's just a coincidence that Paul knows precisely when to buy and sell and it always coincidentally lines up with something like a coming cancellation of subsidies or an upcoming investigation?

    You're always asking for evidence, Evidence boy? You're never offering any. 


  10. 5 hours ago, robosmith said:

    Anything based in insider Congressional info came from BEFORE "The STOCK Act" which was signed by OBAMA in 2012.

    Do you even have an answer to MY QUESTION which YOU QUOTED?

    I could give you a better answer than the silly one you gave me to where did Nancy's money come from. "She made it before the 2012 stock act" did she?  Don't be ridiculous.

    So what do they want from this new bill that they didn't get from the stock act of 2012. Actionable results preventing stuff like this:


    Rep. Nancy Pelosi (D., Calif.) and her multimillionaire husband sold up to $3 million in shares of Google in recent weeks—just before the Biden Justice Department launched an antitrust probe of the tech giant.


    The trades are the latest in a string of questionable transactions for Paul and Nancy.

    They saved roughly $600,000 in June by selling shares of microchip maker Nvidia weeks before the U.S. government placed restrictions on the company's business in China and Russia. The Pelosis have seen their fortune grow $140 million since 2008, thanks largely to Paul Pelosi's stock trades, according to a Washington Free Beacon analysis.

    Pelosi's stock market charades have sparked calls for tougher regulations on members of Congress cashing in on their positions of power.


  11. Is anybody up on this ESG thing? If so explain it to me.

    Near as I can figure it stands for an Environmental, Social and Governance agenda amongst the big investment companies. Currently 30% of such companies have bought in. At the present time it seems more voluntary but there's a push to make reporting mandatory. That seems to be the current trend. So who gets the big money for investments will be decided somewhere by somebody or some thing and all seeking investment opportunities will submit to mandatory monitoring. Have too many lights on? Getting sued by a tranny? Not submitting to authority with acceptable vigor? No cash for you. Or at least that's the direction it's going.

    My big question on it is how long before it filters down to the rest of us? How long before the money and other managers of your life such as banks and electric companies are managing your money and activities based on something like your ESG score? Apparently if you ask the question you're a tin foiler requiring pariah status from great tolerant thinkers like herb and Mikey. So what? These sorts of question need to be asked by the open minded. 

    • Like 1
  12. 40 minutes ago, robosmith said:

    Now SHOW US EVIDENCE that Biden KNEW he had classified docs in those boxes and INTENDED TO KEEP THEM.

    He had them for six years. If he didn't know they were there, he's had Alzheimer's even longer than we thought. And if that's the case, for god's sake clean your house, Jill. Get Hunter to clean the garage. He was in and out of there more than anybody even knows. No doubt collecting info so he can collect his '10% for the big guy.'

  13. 29 minutes ago, robosmith said:

    Trump was CAUGHT HOARDING 300+ classified documents. All accounts report that Biden had ~25, most in boxes packed by HIS STAFFERS.

    No. You're incorrect. At Biden's home they're reported as "items" not documents. Could be boxes of documents.


  14. 1 minute ago, TreeBeard said:

    So you think EVs are going to be limited to 5km range and that no one will be allowed outside their area?   

    I don't remember saying that. Most likely because I didn't.

    Take something like Newsom down in California saying he's going to make gas driven vehicles illegal by 2030 or whenever it is.

    The problem with that is it isn't feasible. The grid wouldn't handle it. The money necessary to make it feasible isn't there and never will be. And it's not just in California they're talking about banning gas driven vehicles.

    So if there's a push to do this but it can't actually be done what do they really want? Cars they will have enough of a grid to keep in the city while the road trip class is out enjoying the highways as they spin past the plebs they've kept to alive to service the roads.

  15. This all sounds very '2030 Agenda-ish' to me.

    The bit they left out is how the Global Resetter investment class like Black Rock and Vanguard have been buying up the suburbs while Gates and others by up farm and ranch land.

    My personal suspicion is this is what the push to go electric with cars is about. Electric and driverless - that's what cars in the 15 minute cities will look like. While Gates and his buddies zip about the vacant countryside, choking down porter house steaks, cuddling city girls all too willing to do anything to get out. They all joke about how they've got the plebs in the cities eating bugs.

    There's the conspiracy theory for you in its complete form. And I don't care who doesn't like it. Every day it gets a little more real. Drip, drip, drip.

    • Haha 2
  16. On 1/24/2023 at 3:11 PM, robosmith said:LMAO


    Here's another interesting little factoid the left doesn't seem to want people to notice.


    During its thirteen-hour search, the DOJ found “six items” containing classified documents at Biden’s home. This does not mean that they found six classified documents, as some reporters have claimed. We do not know exactly how many documents were recovered — which a White House aide confirmed during an interview — because we do not know what the “six items” are. They could be cardboard boxes, plastic tote containers, filing cabinets, woven baskets, any other receptacle capable of holding papers. Any accounting of who had more documents between Trump or Biden is unknowable at this point — and shouldn’t factor into any analysis of the severity of each respective case."

  • Create New...