Infidel Dog

What reality are you living in? BLM and Antifa did all that and more. Much more. And yes the ultimate goal is a communist utopia with those guys so yeah..." change the government by force"

Isn't necessary. Alberta, Saskatchewan and this morning King Doug of Ontario are talking removing restrictions. Commie Bonnie Henry of BC is enjoying her new power too much to fall in line but she will eventually. Apparently the American blue states are talking removing mandates with midterms coming. What will happen when the cheese stands alone. Castro's boy being the cheese.

Are you a victim of lazy reading, or are you hoping everybody else is? You were responding to this:

Read your book, man. "Render therefore unto Caesar the things which are Caesar's; and unto God the things that are God's" - Matthew 22:22 God given rights are God's.

You wanted a conspiracy theory though. Lucky for you, I do requests. Here's one for you... Is there another Toronto election coming up? "Better not run, Conservatives or what we did to Faith we'll do to you?" Toronto's Prog Elite That's what this is really about.

Give it a rest. It was 4 years ago. Your city's crooked election managers with the cooperation of their stenographers in the media and their hip pocket judge won. Toronto lost but they won. Congratulations to them, they won but it's time to leave the poor girl alone now. Blaming the victim and glorying in her pain impresses people less than Toronto's elite might think.

We seem to be looking at different data. Here's what I'm using: https://covid19tracker.ca/provincevac.html?p=ON Using a high estimate of how the regions add up I'll give you 80% fully vaccinated. So let's say 4 times as many as unvaccinated. Considering vaccinated transmit the virus as easily as unvaccinated that's 4 times the chance of getting infected by a vaccinated Ontario-yo. Except you have to factor into that the fact what they call a vaccine is actually more a therapeutic. Meaning it will control some symptoms but that's all. But even that is not 100% and the efficacy of it wanes over months. Efficacy of symptom control can start after 3 months. When you factor everything in you have as good a chance being infected by the jabbed as a pure blood. Myself, I'd say a much better chance but it's at least the same. "Pandemic of the unvaccinated" is a myth. It's an urban legend that some politicians, Big Pharma, the 5 0'clock liars and their gullible viewers like to spread.

And here's a quote from that article so we know exactly what you're talking about. What it forgets to tell you is if you are simply talking about odds you'll get the coof from a jabbed or unjabbed person those odds even out when you factor in the fact that in Canada about 4 times as many people have been jabbed. Doesn't matter though because there's another fact that wipes out every argument on the last couple of pages and I gave you links to it on studies from reputable sources on the previous page. About 4 out of 5 people (this is in America but it translates) have natural immunity after Omicron and Natural immunity can remain strong up to 21 months. There are other studies I can find for you that will tell you vaccine medicinal power to weaken or stop symptoms can start waning after about 3 months. So a majority of people already have greater immunity than the clot-shot can provide. Tell me then, from your high horse why this gives you the right to segregate them from society or deprive them of their jobs when the only crime you can offer up would be not getting a potential protection with possible adverse affects when they already have greater protection.

Of course. You brought it up though, so let's have a look at the whole sentence for context: So yes the idea we could leave the long list of hard facts and get into more debateable areas like those mentioned wasn't necessary and that was common sense - just as I told you. Unnecessary because the point seat belt laws are nothing like vaccine mandates had already been proven. You know that, of course. That's why you're trying so hard to divert with a distorted cherry pick.

Sorry bud but everything in that post is mainstream or common sense verified. If you're afraid to see the one and incapable of the other don't go pretending you're the one with the point.

Seems to me like you either didn't read or want to ignore the rest of the post where the concept of harm was dealt with. Not to worry. Go ahead...mention it again like you don't know what I'm talking about. We can go into greater detail.

Except that's not what your badly written piece actually said. Is it? Here's a direct quote: What hate? Who against whom? Nothing has been "logged." Something has been alleged. And 4 people have been charged...but for what? The Red Star seems afraid to tell you.

And every time you post that BS claim I'm going to remind you it's from some shaved head guy with a ring in his ear who claims he was once a "communications consultant" (whatever that is) making some allegations using a blurry video that doesn't actually show anything. Keep digging.

Insurance is a risk/reward thing. You don't mandate house insurance or life insurance, just car insurance. Why is that? Government was able to mandate seatbelts and motorcycle helmets so why not mandate controls for obesity then? Could I say that? Apparently different things require different rules even for Government and the governed. But...if you really want to compare what you're calling a "vaccine" to seatbelts, let's do it. First of all there's natural immunity. New Harvard, Yale & Stanford Data Show 4 Out of 5 Americans Have Covid ‘Natural Immunity’. I imagine that's similar to natural immunity for Canadians. There's a recent Johns Hopkins study that found natural immunity can remain strong for up to 21 months. That study also said this: Anything about not wearing seatbelts that compares to that? Risk/Reward. What about adverse affects? Are there adverse effects to seatbelts that might compare to those of the mRNA jab? I say no, but we can debate that if you like. The vaccinated transmit and can be infected by the virus as easily as the unjabbed. Using today's Omicron numbers there's no reason to believe you're in much greater danger of being infected by a jabbed or an unjabbed person. So does that equate with your seatbelt analogy as far as risk/reward? And yes, I know the vaccine has some therapeutic effect that can decrease symptoms but that also gives the jabbed confidence to deal with it in public rather than self-isolate. The unjabbed have to be more careful. I know I'm going nowhere after my first sniffle. And in Canada there are at least 4 times more jabbed than unjabbed to worry about. Israel is over 90% jabbed and their infection rate at its peak was the highest in the world. Seatbelts have years of statistical evidence showing the danger of not wearing them has greater societal damage than wearing them. The "vaccine" has never been tested over time and some believe it may damage the immune system over the long term. Is there a danger of future damage with seat belts? Risk/Reward. There's an abundance of evidence showing the societal damage of mandates and lockdowns in general is greater than living free of them. I could go on and we could discuss things like possible relief from things like Ivermectin, Hydroxychloroquine and fluvoxomine if they were accessible or the belief you can improve your chances of surviving the coof with vitamins, quercetin, curcumin, Zinc and such but I think you get the point. The idea Seatbelts = the mRNA jab is bogus. You'd have to capitalize the FALSE in false equivalency.

Still waiting to see something. Some Proggy looking guy with a shaved head and what looks like some sort of ring in his ear making some allegations and offering up a blurry vid of nothing to prove them isn't doing it.

This is cute: I've actually seen a few examples of these convoy inspired kid protest vids today. You know how you know this one wasn't antifa? Antifa pushes their girls to the front. Use your best guess as to why.

Remember when the jab-happy were so smug about polls showing the majority of the populace was pro-mandate? Notice they haven't been posting them lately? Wonder why? Here's a hint... New Poll: 70% Say It's Time to Accept COVID Is Here to Stay and Move On With Our Lives

Didn't a lot of more or less pro-Trump people draw the line at the faith he had in his son-in-law, Jared Kushner? Wasn't the hiring thing one of the things they didn't like about Kushner? Seems to me I heard that somewhere.

My evening news starts at 5. That's why I call them the 5 0'clock lies and the perps that put them out there the 5 0'clock liars. Sometimes I put them on just to see how many of their lies I can tolerate. I think my record is 10 minutes. Those who can break that record I call "the gullibles."

For all we know there are lizard people aliens manipulating world events. There aren't, but for all we know there are. So do you want to start burning down churches because for all you know there might be lizard people aliens in there? Let's be specific. Where do you stand on the church burnings in reaction to the 'for all we know, might be true" mass burial claims?

All we know for sure is they weren't the bodies that have never been found and that's pretty much all there is at present. There have been discoveries that some of the claimed "mass burial sites" were actually just old known but forgotten legitimate burial sites native and non-native. Turns out wooden crosses rot and disappear into the ground. Who knew?

What they call a "vaccine" has some therapeutic use. Or at least it did before Omicron. Good for it. If there wasn't so many adverse affects and possible future dangers (ie damaging of immune systems) that would be a real selling point. But the non-compliant have never been against therapeutics. In fact that's one of pur main complaints, There hasn't been enough emphasis finding medicines, recognizing or using those that might or do exist. Now as to hospitals, I was in one recently for a non-covid related matter. The emergency beds were lined up in the hall and the waiting room was beyond packed. When I finally got to talk to doctor we discussed the overcrowding. He told me they had been talking about getting a new hospital in a neighboring district for years - long before the Chi-Comm virus hit. The Powers that Be finally agreed to do it but now it looks like what they agreed on years ago is going to be too small.

Of abuse? No. But any "witness" claims of mass secret burials I'm aware of turned out to be BS. Lauren Southern explains in her most recent expose: The INSANE Origins of the "Mass Graves" Story Did you know this "mass grave" myth began back in the 90s with some wack-a-doodle, ex-pastor claiming the Queen of England abducted res school kids for sex games, torture and murder? Really. There were witness accounts. The only problem was the Queen never visited Kamloops during the time of that claim.

And I don't know if the guys who should ever click for the info because they just keep on with the "you anti-jabbies are infecting poor innocent little me" crab so let's show them so they can stop acting like they've never seen it: There's still a problem though, because then they start is with the 'yeah, but 80% are vaccinated' crap so the case percentage should be higher. We need to remind them it doesn't matter because if that 80% is responsible for twice as many cases and they are as likely to transmit the disease as the unvaccinated there is no pandemic of the unvaccinated. It's an endemic thing in all citizens and if there aren't enough beds they should get more. They should have done it long before the chi-comm hit because there was a shortage of beds and staff back then.

Now there's a trucker convoy in Australia: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Phub0CZlFV8 It will keep spreading.