Infidel Dog

Also... I think when this is all over and if we ever get another fair democratic vote we need to remember it wasn't just the liberals who were behind this blatant attempt of an authoritarian coup against Canadian rights based governance and democracy. The NDP were in on this too.

How would you know. Admit it. You didn't click her link then posed as having some sort of expertise on her. I doubt you'd even heard of her before running to Google and getting the first page command from Borg central that she was a baddie. That kind of prideful ignorance makes me say if you and yours don't like her she must be worth listening to. And she is. She's what we call a common sense Conservative who does her research. You know, the thing you and yours hate the most.

Jordan Peterson makes a killer point. It isn't just Canada's general international reputation Prime Minister Clownboy has damaged. Peterson says 20% of the world's faith in the Canadian banking system is gone. He says he's getting advice to move his money out of Canadian banks: And yeah, Moonbox, we know. You don't like Peterson either. Just another reason to take him seriously is all that is.

Who was talking about truckers having a few bad actors? Not me. I said the protesters at the massive and peaceful border rally had a few bad actors. Those were just locals who came down to participate. They weren't truckers. Actually I think it was just one guy who spat on an MSM journalist. And you want to compare that guy to the thousands of violent looters, vandals and even murderers in the summer of George Floyd riots and beyond. There is no comparison. That somebody is so divorced from reality he thinks there is makes me wonder what else he got wrong. Actually I don't have to wonder. I know you didn't click the Lauren Southern link yet you want to pretend you have some sort of expertise on her. That's just stupid, man. Why would anybody care what your opinion is of somebody you know nothing about? And don't bother me with a quick Google. You know nothing about her. I know it and you know it.

And speaking of hypocrisy, ignoring the obvious fact that the violence of BLM is largely ignored while protesting against authoritarianism from the ideology that powers that violence gets met with more violence from the guy on top who knelt in support of BLM is beyond hypocritical. It's evil.

Yeah well I guess if I was trying to push the BS you do I'd fear the fact based commentary of somebody like Lauren Southern too. But I'm not, so I recognize comparing the violence of the BLM riots to the non-violent peaceful protest of the Freedom convoy protests and trying to pass them off as the same thing or even comparable is false equivalence nonsense. And failing to notice that many more billions were lost and more small businesses were driven under by the mandates and lockdowns the freedom protests were hoping to do away with isn't just being blind it's hoping to push that lack of observation of the obvious on the rest of us. Also it hopes to evade the main point. Calling non-violence violence because you don't like the cause of the actual peaceful protest is stupid.

The difference is there was a lot of straight out violence from BLM and BLM supporters including looting, billions of dollars in damage and flat out murders. So yeah great masses of them were violent rioters, not protestors. The truck convoy violations were pretty much parking and noise violations. So no, it's not the same logic. And my logic is dead-on. Yours is condescending BS. Want it straight from the horse's mouth (hoof even.?) Here's Lauren Southern, the girl whose video I was discussing that you think gives you right to give me a pat on the head and try to BS me by telling me the border protest was the same thing as the 'summer of love' 2020 riots. She's breaking down the whole truth by telling you what the lies are concerning the Freedom protests. The bit about the media guy who was chased away from the border protest (yes I said protest as opposed to the 'summer of love' BLM/Antifa/Far Left riots of 2020) is towards the end of the video.

They did that thing where they create an incident then want control and controllers to come in and over reach to control something that wasn't a problem before they got there. Here's an idea on how to stop the odd out of control numb skull from spitting on you, MSM. Stop lying.

Sure. Fine spitters. Especially during a pandemic. I didn't see any spitters in the incident Lauren filmed but if some crazed numbskull was spitting (even on MSM liars) somewhere up the 30 kilometre long line of protesters by all means fine him. My critique is that isolated incident was not representative of the day long and weekly peaceful protests at the border. And the 5 O' clock liars gave no explanation as to why that small group had lost control but used the cherry-picked incident to represent a fabricated truth of a lawless violent uprising - otherwise known as a lie.

You guys seem to right on the idea the definitions of right wing and wings in general are changing though. Overton Window and all that. The problem with defining the right wing is we're letting the left wing do it with their louder, more shrill voices. Any section of the right they don't like becomes something they call the "Far Right" until the idea all conservatives are extreme becomes conventional and if you don't think so get ready for a barrage of insults and being shouted down as "far right." Here's an example of what I mean. It's the first definition of "right wing" we see on the search engine, Duck Duck Go. It's from a dictionary that appears to be only about 5 years old but calls itself "American Heritage." Very Prog, right out of the gate. You need to do better Duck Duck Go or we'll start to put "Lame" before your title. Anyway here's the new Prog definition of "Right Wing." "The conservative or reactionary faction of a group." Now my personal, more time worn, conservative definition favors that of the long-running Merriam Webster dictionary. "A person who supports conservative or traditional ideas and policies". That would be old traditional policies like freedom of speech, equality of opportunity to pursue happiness measured by personal responsibility over controlled equity of outcome. Keep what works over deconstruct and "build back better," and such like that.

That's a pretty proggy definition of the word "correct" there, Mikey. What I mean by that is it equates well with what you'd like to believe but it worthless in describing what the word has always meant before you got at it. I'll tell you a story... There's an independent commentator and documentarian named Lauren Southern. She's based out of Langley BC but is known throughout the plugged-in world. She got her start with Rebel News. Last week she was live broadcasting a report from the protest at the Peace Arch Border between White Rock BC and Blaine Washington. She was having a friendly chat with a lady when what looked like the woman's son came up and pointed about 50 feet up the road. A crowd was gathering around a car. Up until then everything had been happy and peaceful. Thousands of people were enjoying a peaceful protest. The commotion around the car though was a journalist pulling out his equipment. It was mainstream media. The crowd shouted "Shame Shame" or "Enemy of the people." They were angry. They chased the MSM guy off. On her live broadcast Lauren was saying, "Just watch. When the report is aired on the mainstream news you won't see any of what you've been watching here all day. You won't see happy peaceful people like your neighbors out here exchanging their views about what's wrong with the current situation. All you'll see is that journalist being "attacked" even though no actual harm was done to him and it was a small isolated incident. She was right. I saw it on the nightly news last night. It was exactly as Lauren predicted. A quick flurry of angry people with no explanation of why then 5 minutes of support for the idea of clearing them off. That's why I call them the 5 O'clock liars and that's why you are incorrect in claiming no one here will accept a report from Rebel News. I'll accept it, consider the evidence and whether or not their claim makes sense. I'll even judge them against the claims from the opposite side. You know...the 5 O'clock liars. I'll even listen to them. Rebel will tell me facts they refuse to though, and I've heard fewer blatant, recognizable lies judged against the evidence of my own eyes than I do at 5 to 7 on the MSM.

What I mean is, the video evidence of the thuggery put in place by the government apparatus is right in front of our faces. That Moonbox doesn't like Ezra Levant is meaningless. Why would we pretend it matters.

See how they did that though? "Ezra's a big, fat poopy head" = Pay no attention to the police thuggery. I don't know if that trick still works or not but they won't stop doing it so there must be some dummies around who are still falling for it.

Yes and he did it with the support of Singh and the NDP. So here's what the Singh led NDP and their partners in crime in the Liberal party are supporting. Their thugs bashed Rebel Reporter, Alexa Lavoie with clubs then shot her point blank in the leg with a tear gas cannister. https://www.rebelnews.com/breaking_rebel_news_journalist_alexa_lavoie_attacked_by_ottawa_police And the full story is out now on the octogenarian, Aboriginal woman who was trampled by RCMP horses. They broke her clavicle. I've read about at least 5 lawsuits or legal actions so far including this one.

A violent response wasn't required at the beginning of these peaceful protests and the overkill of the present response is not needed either.

Yes and the G 20 was overkill with massive repercussions. I believe you knew that and that's why you refused to answer the two people who asked you where the picture of the burning police car you used came from. G 20. You flat out said, you wanted Trudeau to explain why he didn't respond the way they did in G 20. You also talked of Trudeau's "weak-kneed the response." So let's guess the sort of response you wanted. You wanted blood on the streets, Bud. Stop trying to BS us.

Starting to look like trudeau's brownshirts in the black jackets are getting ready to take your advice though. They're almost ready to go full G 20.

Right here, hero: Sheesh, did you honestly think you could bluff your way out of that? Nice try, I guess.

Yeah, I believe the figure I read was 364 times smaller than the width of the tiniest hair on your head. And I believe the aerosol bit they cling to are 2 to 4 times smaller than the perforation in a drug store mask. Drug store masks usually come with a disclaimer stating they don't claim they can stop viruses. If they didn't people would sue when they get infected and by the stats in mask mandated areas it's easy to see people do get infected wearing masks. As to mister NDP guy, hang on Bud, I'll find you some science.

Prove it. Or tell me to prove my claim. Either way you'll be wrong. Just so there's no confusion about what my claim is: Cloth and drugstore masks don't stop aerosol transmission of the virus or protect the user from aerosol transmission.

I've never worn the mask. But to make you Karens happy I keep it below the nose I breath with, then when one of you ridiculous people come up to me thinking you represent some sort of superior moral authority I lift the mask so you can't see me smile as I extend my middle finger. Oh and one more time so you hear me. Masks don't work.

Of course, and so are you. So take your own advice. You don't seem to hear me and a hundred experts telling you the jabbed transmit the virus too. Do I just have to keep reminding you every time you reply? Because that's tedious.

Well sure...if you're symptomatic. So should you. Or did you think you're special? Or protected? Sorry to break it to you. You're not.

They don't work. Make me.

Well don't do it then. Don't be running around with sniffles and coughs thinking you're safe because you had the clot shot. You transmit the Chi-Comm virus as easy as the non-compliant. Speaking for my fellow non-compliants I know we wouldn't do that. Oh and get those ridiculous obedience masks off your faces. They don't work. What? Are you ugly or something" You think those silly rags help?