Infidel Dog

And maybe you gullible TDSers might want to read the things you find on the internet before you start bragging about what you think is in there. Here's the Intro to your article: How is that not what I said?

And Trump mentioning how every million to billionaire including Obama finds ways to pay no more tax than they have to is just him quoting a fact.

Nonsense. The rich find tax breaks. You're not breaking any groundbreaking news by telling people this. It's one of the arguments you hear when they talk about how at one time there was a 90% income tax. The rich were able to hire the people to find them tax breaks and could pay less than they did before the tax hikes. Much less. Remember Warren Buffet pretending to complain about paying less than his secretary on tax while his company fought in court to have billions in tax debt expunged?

Are you still on taxes? Because if you are I'll ask again, "What corruption?" If there was anything to these 'out the Prog butt' allegations don't you think we would have heard about them before the eve of the election?

Trump junior makes an interesting point connected to that. There were cases where these refunds and such the left is pretending to be so outraged about happened under an Obama presidency. Kayleigh Mcenany makes the point that the Dems and their media tried inventing what this thread calls "a tax scandal" in the last election. Didn't work that time either:

What "Trump Tax Scandal?" Are you talking about the fake news article from the fishwrap of record? NY Times tax return nothingburger helps President Trump win more voters

As mentioned on Shady's profile Trump has announced his supreme court justice nominee to replace RBG - Amy Coney Barrett. Excellent choice, I think:

As do I and I don't approve of following the words, deeds or inspiration of the warlord Mohammed and have no problem being critical of those who do.

Good. Then can we also agree there are things in Islam worth critiquing in hopes of preventing their incursion into western developed society. Can we look at a place like Lebanon back when Beirut was considered the "Paris of the Mediterranean" (back before the Islamic incursion into Paris and it was considered an exemplary display of a western developed society), Lebanon opened its doors to Islam and and now it's not so nice or developed. And this problem of opening the doors to the follower of Mohammed goes back to the time the Jews of Medina welcomed Mohammed after he was thrown out of Mecca. Can we look at the problems coming out of the Islamic enclaves (no-go zones) of Europe and say let's not do that over here? Are we allowed to notice the elevated rape stats in Islamic demographics and notice Mohammed endorsed the sexual domination of something he called 'what the right hand possesses." There's a lot Mohammed wanted for his followers that we wouldn't want for a western developed world. Are we allowed to notice that?

You're quibbling over terms. Sharia law is the larger problem. An Islamic theocracy is just an easy to present arena where you can see some problems with it. Sharia can even be a small problem when it's influence burrows into western developed countries like it can do in the Islamic enclaves of Europe.

That's why we of the more developed western nations have a thing called separation of church and state. You know? "The more developed western nations," or what Marocc figures Muslims need to sneak off from to find an Islamic theocracy where they can break the odd law then scamper back to the West when their pubescent or pre-pubescent daughter has been married off or deprived of her clitoris.

I hear Kamala's not campaigning too hard either. It's like their strategy is too rely on ads then wait until after the election and let their "people" decide which mail-out ballots can be counted.

I just heard about it. But always happy to help. Here ya go: Paris attack: Stabbing near Charlie Hebdo office 'an act of terror'

Anyway..."Polling science" is an an out the butt, invented term based on nothing.Calling polls science negates the utility of science.

Yes, apart from that. You'd like to 'whatabout' religions offering up what you see as similarities in religious excess, thinking that allows you to ignore how they're different. You give an example of a state where abortion is illegal and treated in the law as murder. Within that system a miscarriage was allegedly mistaken for abortion and a woman did time for murder. But that was not a religious law. It may have reflected the 80 some odd percent Catholic Culture but El Salvador is not a theocracy. It's a democratic republic. When women who report they've been raped in an Islamic country who's legal system is run on the religious system of Sharia and they are themselves jailed for being immoral that's a religious law written into the law from the Quran. If you twist and spin them about you can find similar bits in the teachings of Mohammed and Christ but - as already mentioned - one was a slaving, murdering, thieving, warlord who banged a nine year old and the other was pretty much just a hippy. You can find excesses written into the Bible or the Quran but the examples of those excesses making their way into contemporary life are more often blatant and egregious in Islam. For example take the Quranic verse 9.29 Three things are embedded in that verse - the Islamic tax on unbelievers called Jizya, enmity for the unbeliever (or Dhimmi) and the order to move always towards the non-Muslim's subjugation through unequal treatment. And we see how these religious demands make their way into contemporary society in a way that can be blatant, outrageous and egregious to the Western mind. Here are some examples: https://www.jihadwatch.org/tag/jizya

More often than we'd like to admit, the girls return without a clitoris.

Muslims? What do they have to do with the Republic of El Salvador's law against abortion? If you're interested though, as I understand it most Shariah governed societies allow abortions, at least in cases where the mother's health is at risk or there are fetal abnormalities. I don't know of an Islamic country where they allow late term abortions. The way I heard it the Koran opposes infanticide. So they got that much right, anyway.

Yeah El Salvador is a pretty backward little country. Hard to believe they're governed as a Democratic Republic. Technically I think the woman was charged for murder. I think the hospital said the miscarriage was an abortion. Their law considers abortion murder. Still...no excuse. In countries run on the Islamic law of Sharia we find this: British woman 'arrested in Dubai after being raped' This will make you think twice before ever handing over your passport again. Women jailed for being raped in countries run by Islamic law has been happening for years and as far as I know still does. Then there's this business of what Mohammed called "what the right hand possesses." Basically according to Mohammed if you take possession of a woman who's an unbeliever she's yours to "till as you would your soil." So if you're say, doing some Gang Grooming of young British girls you can justify that in your mind and your community by quoting the Koran.

What were you saying "never happened." then. Because that did happen and the angry homicidal manner in which the Islamic perp conducted that crime made French citizens who had been observing similar crimes of anger from the followers of the warlord Mohammed wonder what was at the bottom of it.

And Spencer's question is totally centered on the question of ideology. It has nothing to do with He's asking if cases like the vehicular homicide of Axelle Dorier can be connected to the mindset inculcated into a radical Islamic mind by organizations like the Islamic State.

I'm not sure what you're talking about but at least you don't deny the central facts of what happened anymore. It did happen. It happened and Jihad Watch quoted the facts from other media. Your denial of the facts was a lie. What you seem to be objecting to now is Spencer's prelude question to the facts of the case which went like this: Did this call or others like it have anything to do with the murder of Axelle Dorier? Given the reticence of French authorities to acknowledge the nature and magnitude of the jihad threat, we may never know.

I actually had somebody make that boast to me on another message board so I challenged him to do it so we could see for ourselves. He tried. I posted the insanity of the religion of peace posts against his. He didn't do well. He gave up. But go ahead if you think you can succeed where he failed, fill your boots.

Mike seems to be saying he doesn't think there are enough posts here on the 'This Week in Islam' thread. I'd say to him, be careful what you wish for: Eiffel Tower Evacuated After Bomb Threat From Man Shouting “Allahu Akbar” Muslim kills Portuguese man in front of kebab shop to 'avenge the Prophet Dad's arrest exposes support network behind alleged Honor Killers Facebook Post By New Arab Party Tells Swedes Who Don’t Like Diversity To Leave……. Muslim screaming ‘Allahu akbar’ stabbed man because victim’s father advertised for anti-Islamization party “The Scene was Horrific”: Persecution of Christians IDF soldiers fire at firebomb-throwing terrorists ISIS ‘Beatles’ CAN face trial in US after terror suspect’s mum loses High Court challenge

What never happened? There was a French woman. She was walking her dog. A car hit her, dragged her 800 metres, dismembering her. It was driven by a Muslim guy with another Muslim guy in the car. That did happen. What do you think didn't happen that makes the story false? You say you don't care, very well, good for you. Don't bother lying by telling us some event didn't happen that we now know did happen then. If you did care though what you would do would be investigate the story you obviously knew nothing about and try to make the point that we're missing context. Then I couldn't just notice you were lying when you pretended to have some special insight and hoped to bluff us into believing the event that did happen didn't.