Jump to content

Cannucklehead

Member
  • Posts

    2,028
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Cannucklehead

  1. Why should we? Sanctions are enough imo. Ukraine was never a member of NATO. The cold war was america and russia. America begged us for help.
  2. Well then tell trump to top them. I'll get the marshmallows ready for when you're glowing in the dark.
  3. Still Canadian when he actually was popular for some reason
  4. No, what were afraid of is still going to happen regardless of spending. Not all the missiles will be stopped in the event of a nuclear war and the fallout can easily spread to Canada. Sure we'd still be around but a lot would be killed or severely hospitalized.
  5. https://www.dictionary.com/e/politics/trumpian/ Lol go listen to some more Neil Young.
  6. https://www.google.ca/amp/s/qz.com/1680411/us-and-russia-are-starting-another-nuclear-war/amp/ What we are afraid of is the crossfire.
  7. Like how america consumes all manner of Canadian media. So I guess america is Canadas chihuahua?
  8. Who doesnt like to watch a 73 year old child whine and complain? Sure it's annoying when you're the parent....
  9. https://www.google.ca/amp/s/globalnews.ca/news/5494990/nato-secretary-general-meet-trudeau-toronto/amp/
  10. That's one of the things trump is really confusing about. He complains that NATO does not spend enough but says they are obsolete. Maybe NATO would have more money if he got the Saudis to actually pay up, instead of sending the deadbeats more ammo.
  11. https://news.google.ca/articles/CAIiEC-QbgSpds51k_0xbO9syX4qGQgEKhAIACoHCAowqeP_CjDdg_oCMMTh6QU?hl=en-CA&gl=CA&ceid=CA%3Aen I think he just got more popular in Alberta.
  12. Obama sanctioned Russia over the annexation. Perhaps you'd prefer trump top that and declare war? I'm with you.
  13. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_Firearms_Act On June 26, 1934 congress stated: For purposes of federal law, a “machinegun” is defined as: [A]ny weapon which shoots, is designed to shoot, or can be readily restored to shoot, automatically more than one shot, without manually reloading, by a single function of the trigger. The term shall also include the frame or receiver of any such weapon, any part designed and intended solely and exclusively, or combination of parts designed and intended, for use in converting a weapon into a machinegun, and any combination of parts from which a machinegun can be assembled if such parts are in the possession or under the control of a person.12 https://lawcenter.giffords.org/gun-laws/policy-areas/hardware-ammunition/machine-guns-50-caliber/
  14. https://www.google.ca/amp/s/fortune.com/2018/02/21/bump-stocks-ban-las-vegas-shooting/amp/ Still, this is more of a technicality than a significant difference in the amount of damage possible with a bump stock. A fully automatic weapon shoots about 14 rounds per second. Using a bump stock with a semi automatic AR-15 gave the Las Vegas shooter the ability to fire about 9 shots per second, according to analysis of footage by the New York Times. 9x60= a lot of stupid death.
  15. Dont feel too bad, bojo was born american.
  16. https://www.google.ca/amp/s/www.cbc.ca/amp/1.4817751 Pierre Trudeau, who was then prime minister, argued against the idea of a notwithstanding clause but faced opposition from provinces that wanted a way to override some charter guarantees. Finally, on the night of Nov. 4, 1981, then-justice minister Jean Chrétien and Saskatchewan's then-attorney general Roy Romanow hammered out the so-called "Kitchen Accord" — a compromise that included an entrenched charter of rights along with notwithstanding provisions. Following some more tweaking (all without Quebec's participation), the federal government and nine provinces (Quebec refused to go along) signed the constitutional accord on Nov. 5, 1981 — an accord that included a notwithstanding clause. Interesting.
  17. That's why we have minimum wage jobs. You dont need a lot of skills to work in those positions.
  18. Everyone does. So how does selling arms to countries that dont pay make for a strong economy?
  19. Might as well if the company isn't being paid for the job imo. Switch it up to make vehicles for Canadians. Canada first!
  20. Lol article from a year and a half ago.
×
×
  • Create New...