Marocc

Deny what?

They literally say it is to help non-Muslim refugees.

It doesn't say anything about their religion nor that they're Pakistanis.

The Indian politician Manish Sisodia accuses police of lighting buses on fire on behalf of BJP during protests. Indianexpress.com/bjp-used-police-to-set-buses-afire-during-delhi-protest-alleges-manish-sisodia

You ignored the entire point.

That's not true of course. Not all laws applied by Islamic countries are applied according to Islam. But I didn't say not wearing one makes an individual a non-Muslim. Do you know why?

Not sure if I understand the sentence, but the end sounds vague to say the least. Who wouldn't argue with it?

I know many of you aren't big on providing sources for your claims, but I urge you to provide 1 that says the Prophet Muhammad (Sallaa lahu alayhi wa sallam) ever burned anyone alive or approved of such action.

Is it that you don't believe in God, but you assume to know what *it* that doesn't exist would be if it did exist? And the people who do believe, by evidence of the Holy Scripture know, that we cannot comprehend God. But you who know that *it* doesn't exist, know exactly what *it* that you know doesn't exist and never did, would be like if it did exist. Atheist logic.

Merriam Webster: Definition of worldview: : a comprehensive conception or apprehension of the world especially from a specific standpoint

No comment, but don't bring it up then. So do mosques That's their shame I wonder what your definition of extremism is. Could it be.... Being a Muslim? @Goddess is still busy delivering proof of a similar claim. Maybe you can spare her the trouble and do it yourself. Sources? Reasoning? Anything? Ok. So long as it is according to Islam.

India might trigger yet another refugee flood. https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2019/12/millions-muslim-refugees-flee-india-pakistan-pm-khan-191217102410112.html

What could that be? Could that be the problem?

Still waiting for the credible source.

Brutal? I'm glad we agree on the modesty part. Now I'm sure even you can understand at least one problem with Samina Ali's speech. Actually the dress of men is not a simple matter either, in my opinion, when it comes to what is modest enough and in what situation. The big difference is in that the definite rule on what constitutes men's awrah is agreed upon.

They did not do it to amuse him but because they felt the two women had done wrong. And again it is not a punishment where they are to inflict injury or pain, but a gesture to correct their behaviour.

Never said that. Would mean nothing to you since you don't know what it means.

≠

Never claimed that.

Another Hadith narrated by Aisha reads: Aisha (RA) reported: The Messenger of Allah, peace and blessings be upon him, did not strike a servant or a woman, and he never struck anything with his hand. Ṣaḥīḥ Muslim 2328 The hadith you are referring to, even though incorrectly, is the following: Muhammad b. Qais said (to the people): Should I not narrate to you (a hadith of the Holy Prophet) on my authority and on the authority of my mother? We thought that he meant the mother who had given him birth. He (Muhammad b. Qais) then reported that it was 'A'isha who had narrated this: Should I not narrate to you about myself and about the Messenger of Allah ﷺ? We said: Yes. She said: When it was my turn for Allah's Messenger ﷺ to spend the night with me, he turned his side, put on his mantle and took off his shoes and placed them near his feet, and spread the corner of his shawl on his bed and then lay down till he thought that I had gone to sleep. He took hold of his mantle slowly and put on the shoes slowly, and opened the door and went out and then closed it lightly. I covered my head, put on my veil and tightened my waist wrapper, and then went out following his steps till he reached Baqi'. He stood there and he stood for a long time. He then lifted his hands three times, and then returned and I also returned. He hastened his steps and I also hastened my steps. He ran and I too ran. He came (to the house) and I also came (to the house). I, however, preceded him and I entered (the house), and as I lay down in the bed, he (the Holy Prophet) entered the (house), and said: Why is it, O 'A'isha, that you are out of breath? I said: There is nothing. He said: Tell me or the Subtle and the Aware would inform me. I said: Messenger of Allah, may my father and mother be ransom for you, and then I told him (the whole story). He said: Was it the darkness (of your shadow) that I saw in front of me? I said: Yes. He struck me on the chest which caused me pain, and then said: Did you think that Allah and His Apostle would deal unjustly with you? She said: Whatsoever the people conceal, Allah will know it. He said: Gabriel came to me when you saw me. He called me and he concealed it from you. I responded to his call, but I too concealed it from you (for he did not come to you), as you were not fully dressed. I thought that you had gone to sleep, and I did not like to awaken you, fearing that you may be frightened. He (Gabriel) said: Your Lord has commanded you to go to the inhabitants of Baqi' (to those lying in the graves) and beg pardon for them. I said: Messenger of Allah, how should I pray for them (How should I beg forgiveness for them)? He said: Say, Peace be upon the inhabitants of this city (graveyard) from among the Believers and the Muslims, and may Allah have mercy on those who have gone ahead of us, and those who come later on, and we shall, God willing, join you. https://muflihun.com/muslim/4/2127 The words strike and struck as used in the hadiths are different words in Arabic. The first one is that of striking, the second one is that of pushing or nudging. Abu Dharr reported: I said, “O Messenger of Allah, will you not appoint me as a leader?” The Prophet, peace and blessings be upon him, struck my chest with his hand, then he said, “O Abu Dharr, you are weak and it is a position of public trust. Verily, on the Day of Resurrection it will only result in regret, except for one who takes it by right and fulfills its duties.” In another narration, the Prophet said, “I love for you what I love for myself. Do not command even two people, and do not manage the property of an orphan.” Source: Ṣaḥīḥ Muslim 1825 https://abuaminaelias.com/dailyhadithonline/2012/08/04/imam-sultan-amanah-trust/

I am unable to find this narration from the books of hadith. I can find it from sites such as religionofpeace, gellerreport and jihadwatch. If you are actually able to unearth such or similar from the books of hadith you are welcome to present it. What I found was a hadith that clearly describes the same incident even though in a wildly different manner: Narrated 'Ikrima: Rifa'a divorced his wife whereupon 'AbdurRahman bin Az-Zubair Al-Qurazi married her. 'Aisha said that the lady (came), wearing a green veil (and complained to her (Aisha) of her husband and showed her a green spot on her skin caused by beating). It was the habit of ladies to support each other, so when Allah's Apostle came, 'Aisha said, "I have not seen any woman suffering as much as the believing women. Look! Her skin is greener than her clothes!" When 'AbdurRahman heard that his wife had gone to the Prophet, he came with his two sons from another wife. She said, "By Allah! I have done no wrong to him but he is impotent and is as useless to me as this," holding and showing the fringe of her garment, 'Abdur-Rahman said, "By Allah, O Allah's Apostle! She has told a lie! I am very strong and can satisfy her but she is disobedient and wants to go back to Rifa'a." Allah's Apostle ﷺ said, to her, "If that is your intention, then know that it is unlawful for you to remarry Rifa'a unless Abdur-Rahman has had sexual intercourse with you." Then the Prophet saw two boys with 'Abdur-Rahman and asked (him), "Are these your sons?" On that 'AbdurRahman said, "Yes." The Prophet ﷺ said, "You claim what you claim (i.e.. that he is impotent)? But by Allah, these boys resemble him as a crow resembles a crow," https://muflihun.com/bukhari/72/715

The hadith is weak and even as that it doesn't mean a man has the right to beat his wife it means he should not be made to say anything bad about his wife.

Your brought up the scirupture of Christians and the Jews even though last time we talked about it you ran away as soon as I asked for poof. And here still I am waiting for proof that you are better at understanding both the Qur'an and Arabic than professionals and scholars are.

A bunch of grass.

You said scourge, it says scourge. Just pointing out the problem with placing the Bible against the Quran as the supposedly better one.