Marocc

Didn't say I know. It would suit you too, to acknowledge it when you make assumptions. I meant the plural you. That's good, but does it mean that 1) I can't mention new developments in the situation and 2) I ought to know what you personally have information of already? You have many times abhorred the treatment of some people by some Muslims. Are you done with that? So yes — hypocritical. This environment doesn't call for those in my opinion, but if you want to hear my personal opinion on a particular matter, you can ask for it. Some reasons I don't think it is called for: — You will dismiss nearly anything and everything I say, be it good or bad. — you don't understand Islam. Hence it would be difficult to explain my perspective and be understood properly — I am interested in such discussion when it is constructive. Muslims are not to speak evil of others whether it is a lie or the truth, unless there is a valid reason to do so. — You usually insist on placing Muslims in certain categories which I do not accept and that way my attempts at giving my view might do more harm than good. I believe the placing of Muslims into the categories in itself is harmful.

You think it's an answer to your posts about terrorism and such because that's what you would do, I assume. But it isn't. I think you are less likely to follow such news as I do that relate to the Muslim people, — and may well relate to acts of terrorism as well — I like to share those with you so that you may gain advantage from it. Nevertheless, your complaint is extremely hypocritical.. Only crime and the criminal, it is true, confront us with the perplexity of radical evil; but only the hypocrite is really rotten to the core. —Hannah Arendt

It's about a renewed Hitler's Germany type of oppression against certain Muslims out there. Over a million of them — so far. Not that I thought you'd care, but the thread is about Islam, basically. I like to share relevant information. (Just imagine that kind of thing happening to Christians on Muslims' land. How horrific would that be? A disgrace, disgusting.) I provided the real information behind the lies in your links. I'm not particularly interested in going through a ton of articles that I already know are wrong — but I may go through some if there is some particular issue/detail you wished I'd address.

I guess not. Why? There are only three types of people; those who have found God and serve him; those who have not found God and seek him, and those who live not seeking, or finding him. The first are rational and happy; the second unhappy and rational, and the third foolish and unhappy. — Blaise Pascal

Relocating for forced labor

Source for that? And, um, because of that? Is that an opinion? Source? —Temporarily. Where's your source for the entire article? No. It's for educational purposes. Lots of groups visit them. Nothing went wrong. There were no problems present during the visits. Some of them parents, some of them not. That's a lie. Some of them were migrants. The amount of reports (they were not just of rape) was not significantly different from other regions. Unlikely, but a source might solve that. Religion is so great a thing that it is right that those who will not take the trouble to seek it if it be obscure, should be deprived of it. —Blaise Pascal

Another fiction story in mind? Why don't you continue this one by telling where you imagine that information came from? The quote you put there is not regarding rapes at all. But people like you want everyone to be afraid of Muslims. That way some women become frightened when approached by a Muslim — a man even.

I read the description in the link you — I believe — linked. What it described is nearly the same as what teenagers are taught in schools in the west, with only slight differences. The first university ever, was established by Muslims. There are many many highly educated refugees. And many many little educated Westerners. And if it is such a simple thing— this difference between consensual and non-consensual —why is it so difficult for so many Westerners, oh, and probably non-religious ones at that, to understand what it means when a woman says no?

Good we have you though. The Swedish police — what do they know.

More than anything it is vague. I know it isn't easy to form a coherent argument that isn't broken down by a fifth grader, but in order to make one, you would have to differentiate between Islam, Muslims, and others.

Islamophobe logic. "The refugees all have been taught at home women can be raped and it's okay." state offers free education relating to sex. Islamophobics can find nothing wrong with the education or those receiving it. "They're offering to teach the uneducated illiteral refugees about sex! They teach that to my kids in school but oh no, they teach it to refugees. That's so.... so..... I don't know what is wrong with it, but it's just soo......" *faints

I do not follow Shia, Alawite or Ismaili doctrine.

Source, please — no Shia source please.

You accuse others of what you're guilty of and you exaggarate their actions — which you view negatively — as though they were worse than yours. That's unheathly.

Where's that from?

She didn't say no. You lied about my words. Read back and choose for yourself. 1+1=2 or 1+1=3. It's not my loss if you think 1+1=3.

If that's an insult to you then you're insulting your own 'dignity' by lying constantly. What value does intelligence have if it doesn't come with kindness? It never occurred to me I had to take care of my credibility with you. Now that I think about it... No, it really isn't necessary. Credibility is not a concern of mine in itself, but honesty is. With that I have the other one too.

I didn't say it's true, you liar.

No. I'm not commenting on that. I'm saying your sources are propaganda sources.

Now I think I understand. Your friends — all of them together possibly — were part of a sort of nonexistent 'peaceful military' who walk from door to door like missionaries spreading the secular message of peace. While on their mission they got caught by enemy forces and were forced to watch....... ......... No wait, this doesn't work. I still have to ask, how they were freed. How were they freed? Did they get to grow drugs after that in Afganistan land?

I have an idea. What if you stopped arguing about who cares the most and start talking about who does the most to help people? Those extreme case victim female Muslims you give as examples so eagerly are not affected by your caring if it doesn't transform into action.

Thanks for the propagandist input anyway.

If someone puts a gun to their head, yeah. But you lie anytime anywhere.

Surah Al-Ankabut 28 And (remember) Lut: behold, he said to his people: "Ye do commit lewdness, such as no people in Creation (ever) committed before you. 29 "Do ye indeed approach men, and cut off the highway?- and practise wickedness (even) in your councils?" But his people gave no answer but this: they said: "Bring us the Wrath of Allah if thou tellest the truth." Surah Al-Hijr 58 Qaloo inna orsilna ila qawmin mujrimeena They said: "We have been sent to a people (deep) in sin, Mujrimeena = criminals, disbelivers, polytheists, sinners

Actually I misread your comment and was thinking of death penalty for homosexuality or homosexual acts. Not that I'm aware of other occasions of punishments either that have happened. In January a 31-year-old man was hung for sexual intercourse between two men and kidnapping of two 15-year-old boys. You mean at the news regarding punishments for homosexuality? I am not too interested.