Yzermandius19

when it doesn't involve killing babies

science agrees with me your opinion I don't care about it's stupid and feelings driven with no logic whatsoever

the existence of a human being begins at conception gaining functionality as it goes does not magically turn it from a non-human into a human just as taking functionality away from a human does not magically turn it from a human into a non-human

a fertilized egg is a human being with own unique DNA I'm not a fan of killing people to do that research but I don't see a reason to oppose it if that isn't happening

the notion that it isn't a person is absurd any biologist worth their salt will tell you it is killing people is more upsetting to the natural order than preserving some fertilized eggs why would people being born after their biological parents are dead be a bad thing?

not only will it not be erased it will be cemented Trump's SCOTUS picks are excellent they didn't go along with his assessment that he won in 2020 they are not his yes men taking away their control is not gonna happen and it definitely isn't fair game

as many as it takes killing them is worse than your imaginary scenarios

why do you pretend as if a run of the mill Harpercon is a far right extremist? how far to the left do you have to be to think something that ridiculous?

Republicans will control the SCOTUS for decades and there is nothing you can do about it your attempts to stack the Supreme Court signal just how desperate you are and how you have no chance to win any other way

I don't have a problem with the state storing them if no one else wants to that's a way better plan than killing them

you have won it far more times yet you throw stones from a glass house

no it isn't a person in a coma doesn't have consciousness but if they come out of it they do same as an unborn child you don't argue to kill the comma patient if there is a near certainty they will regain consciousness in a few months therefore you should apply that same standard to an unborn child killing someone before they gain inevitable consciousness doesn't make it moral to kill you just don't like any comparison between an impaired adult and an unborn child because it draws your devaluing of human life using arbitrary criteria into question

not kill them

blames a partisan court wants to stack the court with partisans as the solution absolute genius people like you are why people elected Trump in the first place to stick it to people like you 6-3 SCOTUS decades of winning ahead decades of whining from you

killing 17 million is not a good thing anyone saying it is is morally bankrupt

it won't and if it did that still doesn't make it moral it kill them especially when falling birth rates are an issue and will become an even bigger issue going forward

there being a backlog is no excuse to kill

as many as it takes

the Ukrainians think the price is worth it the Russians paying the price is of benefit to America and NATO

they have no options anything they charge him with won't stick these hearings are a nothingburger they only people who believe otherwise were already baked into the cake as never voting for Trump before January 6th they don't move the needle at all if they charge him with anything it will be seen as the political witch hunt that it is and increase his popularity even more he's going to win in 2024 better brace for it now

wait until someone does

who's forcing? if they'd rather kill them than have someone use them that's totally immoral

keep them as long as you can and if you aren't going to use them someone else can intentional destruction of human beings is an immoral option

it would be better if they get used efforts should be made to see that they are they shouldn't be intentionally destroyed and preserved as long as possible if those criteria are met, IVF wouldn't be an issue

the true tards think Trudeau is on the right or a centrist how far on the left do you have to be to think Trudeau isn't? is that you Fidel?