Yzermandius19

They miss out on the good players and then they draft bums and miss on pretty much every first rounder they've had for a decade. Bad combo.

I pointed out that the sources they use in this article are disgruntled ex-employees and people who have no evidence he said what they say he said. It's all hearsay, and you have failed to address this point, instead pretending that because Politico used them as sources, they must be credible sources. Stop hiding behind the brand name publisher's credibility, and address the actual claims in the article relative to actual evidence presented. Appealing to authority is not a good argument, it's a logical fallacy.

Except your certainty that they are unbiased and just doing their job is unfounded and that is plain as day reading the article. This story is the fakest of news, this is National Enquirer level garbage at best. Your trust is journalists is misguided, no news organizations reputation is good enough to not take their politics news with a massive grain of salt, blind faith is completely unwarranted.

I looked at your article, most of the sources were ex-employees or others who have no proof he said what they say he said, it's all their word against his, and you believe them because they paint Trump in a negative light, your opinion is the ridiculous one, you'll believe anything that makes Trump look bad, no matter how flimsy. No actual evidence presented where Trump says something racist publicly, just accusations he said or did things in private that have no corroboration. Very Fake News. Your entire argument is they are Politico, so I believe them, appeal to authority, no actual examination of the evidence presented, just you agree with Politico, and I should just take their word for it, no matter how flimsy their evidence is, because they are the "experts". That's ridiculous.

It's like he was trying to become one of the worst GM's in hockey as quick as possible, well done Fenton.

You think spitting is no big deal, because you are a terrible human being, it's assault, you are advocating assault. Being willing to spit on someone for wearing a hat, is even worse though, what a loser.

It's in the article, read your own article dummy, all their sources are hearsay.

Spitting is violent, spitting can transmit disease. People cheering you doesn't make you a good person, it makes them evil, just like you.

They have no evidence, that is why you should dismiss them, they have heresay. You believe the claims because they match your confirmation bias, it has nothing to do with the strength of the evidence. Politico is trash and extremely biased against Trump, if you think otherwise, it's because your bias exceeds their own, and you can't tell the difference between Trump Derangement and real criticism of the man.

You are terrible person if you would spit on anyone wearing a MAGA hat, I hope you do and they throw you in jail, you wannabe criminal. Your willingness to be violent towards those for merely disagreeing with your politics is exactly why Trump was elected.

There is no evidence he said those things, you believe disgruntled employees with every incentive to lie. This is not real tangible evidence, if there was evidence, you would have a video clip of him saying racist things. In his tweet he said it was infested with rats, not black people. His tweets were pro-people and and anti-rat, the infestation reference had nothing to do with people, it's all in your imagination. You are a terrible mind reader, stop pretending what he said was racist, because of implications that no one who didn't already think he was racist sees.

Indeed, so stop calling everyone who voted for Trump deplorables, when many Trump voters actually voted for Obama, twice, in key swing states, and they are actually the group most responsible for his election win. They are not racist, they just disagree with you, you are using the word to describe anyone who disagrees with you, and it drives people away from lefties triggered by Trump, and drives them to Trump. Being the boy who cried racist is a losing election strategy, if you truly don't want Trump to win, stop making it a go-to attack on Trump, and stop writing off all his supporters as racist, it hurts the cause you claim to champion. If you want Trump to keep winning and the Democrats to keep losing, then double down on the fail, like a rube. Go ahead, pretend all Trump supporters are evil racists, and twist every statement Trump makes into a racist screed where none exists, it only empowers Trump fool. With enemies like this, Trump doesn't need friends, enemies of his enemies will be happy to vote for him to stick it to the haters whose extremism drives away swing voters.

His supporters flock to him because the media and nutjobs keep calling him racist for things that obviously aren't racist, and they are sick of being called racist by these folks as well, so they sympathize with Trump for being mischaracterized like they are. You are the one who thinks criticizing black people is racist, assuming the only reason to criticize a black person would be because they are black and certainly it couldn't be for any legitimate reason. But that whole thought process is actually racist, what Trump has said is not racist.

Politico is imaging it too. Heresay is not evidence. Claiming all of Trump's supporters are racist is a big reason he got elected in the first place, you think everyone who disagrees with you is a racist, you are the extremist, not Trump supporters. The racism is all in your head, and the heads of others suffering from Trump Derangement Syndrome.

Yeah they did just hire Paul Fenton, but he's done such a terrible job so quickly that he deserved to get canned, truly a garbage GM.

He played good in the AHL last year, he did great in the two NHL games he played this year with the Avs, small sample size at the NHL level though. He might be great, might not be able to handle being an NHL backup, might be something in between, kind of a wild card. I have no idea what to think, goalies are voodoo, so far so good, but it might not mean anything.

Indeed, especially when Vasilevsky is due for $6 million raise after next year.

A successful attempt to change the conversation. Now it's all anyone is talking about.

I did refute the piece, all of the people saying he said and did racist stuff have credibility issues as disgruntled ex-employees, and there is no evidence that he said or did anything that they said he did. You literally believe it only because it is telling you what you want to hear, so you are willing to grasp at straws like that article.

He attacked Trump, Trump attacked him back. Cummings attacked the border situation, Trump attacked his backyard situation.

Disgruntled employees who have no proof he said or did anything they say he did are not good evidence of racism, it's pure heresay, their word against his. Clown college.

The idea that representatives that either represent or have heritage from places that are impoverished are immune from criticism is extremely dumb, regardless of their race. It is not racist to criticize black people, anymore than it's racist to criticize white people, enough of the obvious double standard that is only employed because of your hatred of Trump.

He never did that in his tweets. You are imagining things that never happened.

That too. Shame they don't have a real 1C though, they in the Nashville zone.

Trump never said the large rat population is due to Baltimore's large black population. Bernie Sanders said worse things about Baltimore, saying West Baltimore was like a third world country, while his black supporters clapped behind him, and that's not racist. But pointing out Baltimore is infested with rats is somehow racist when PBS says the same thing? When HBO portrays Baltimore as a poorly run city in one of the greatest TV shows of all-time, that's not racist, but when Trump portrays Baltimore as being a poorly run city, it's racist? Puh-lease. Obvious double standard is obvious, it's only racist when the Bad Orange Man says it, Trump's tweets only seems racist to those who already thought he was a racist before he said it, and are looking to view his words through a racist lens. Anyone who isn't doing that can see as plain as day that those tweets weren't racist. If a black dem tweeted that part of Alabama that is infested with rats, is infested with rats, that's not racist at all, and it wouldn't be racist if he criticized a white republican who represented that part of Alabama either. None of that is racist, flip it around, and it's easy to see Trump wasn't being racist, so stop trying to twist everything Trump says into a racist screed. It is not racist to criticize black democrats, and it is not racist to criticize Baltimore either. It's not racist to criticize white republicans, and it's not racist to criticize majority white areas either.