Yzermandius19

When the Depression came, enter the New Deal, and Trump is bringing an end to the New Dealers, so that could incite the radical left as well, and viola Green New Deal. America went left last time a Depression came on a Republican's watch, not right. It's more likely to work against Trump than in his favor, ask Hoover.

Trump could still win if the economy goes in the crapper, it might not hurt him as much as it would hurt most in his position, but an economic downturn certainly won't help him, and I don't see how it doesn't at least hurt a little. I mean if Trump is teflon even in the face of a bad economy on election day, he's a political genius. That's FDR territory, and even in that case, the bad economy still hurt FDR, just not enough to lose. If Trump is unphased by it, that's next level right there.

Oh man, you should see some of the dolts on the MHF claiming that an economic downturn won't hurt Trump, because the public will realize it's all a vast left wing conspiracy to hurt Trump and everybody knows it , so they'll just give him a pass and blame the media, deep state and democrats instead. Absolutely hilarious.

Printing the cash, inflating the moneys, Calling up China, yo we straight outta twenties. All up in the club we be loudin' out, While in the market, yeah we be crowding out. On the beach getting tan and sipping Corona, I got a monetary plan, and it involves a lot of toner.

The New Deal deepened the depression, a Reagan like build up would shorten it. MIC Stimulus is the effective stimulus, inflationary over deflationary ftw.

Bernie's national polling has held steady since mid-May. There was that one poll that had him up in NH though.

But Smoot-Hawley came before the New Deal, Smoot-Hawley was Hoover, New Deal was FDR. Not that Hoover didn't go the policy stimulus as well, just saying.

Donald Trump, New Cold Warrior, embrace it.

Trump needs to use the TDS to bring Cold War Two into the foreground, and force the Democrats to defend China by getting tougher on them, and then once they take the bait, keep hammering that home with the tweets. Give the Dems that Pro-Chicom rope so they can hang themselves.

Just nuke their nukes right out the gate, don't even give them the option to commit suicide by going to the nukes first. Out escalate the escalators, that'll teach em'.

If they come out swinging, knock them the f*ck out, that'll teach em'. China ain't nobody.

It's a game of chicken. The only way America loses is if they back down, even in a collision, they'll get the better of the collision by a country mile. China is completely screwed unless America goes pansy and simply lets them win as to not rock the boat.

Oh so waiting too long will result in China being in an even weaker position, so it's better to fight soonish, to maximize their chances of victory, even if those chances are still really low?

Why wouldn't he wait until he's in a stronger position? Confronting America now could end up with China getting f*cked up real bad, and how is that good for him consolidating power, when the power he'll be consolidating will be significantly reduced?

Xi Jinping better be careful what he wishes for though, because bumbling your way into a military confrontation with America is a pretty shitty way to consolidate power. If you are going to confront them, best wait until you're in a much stronger position than China is now.

So not reckless enough to go looking for a confrontation with America, but reckless enough that they might bumble into one anyway.

Seems like the Democrats will have hard time pitching that they are tougher on China than Trump, given that kabuki theatre. Only Nixon can go to China though, so they probably realize they are better off under Trump, unless they have no intention of making a deal with America, and want to invite a military confrontation for some weird reason, that would be pretty stupid though, the Chinese aren`t that dumb, are they?

You think Trump is going to get that deal done in time or will the Chinese roll the dice and hope he doesn`t get reelected in 2020?

In the face of a serial killer army, who is more likely to get elected, the party that is tough on crime, or the party that is soft on crime? Maybe we should ask George McGovern, perhaps he knows.

Mass Shooters will reach oversaturation at some point, and at that point, the only way to truly grab infamy will be to get multiple mass shootings in, instead of committing suicide by cop or committing suicide after by their own hand, or turning themselves in, they`ll hit and run and keep it going as long as possible, while trolling the media at every turn.

I bet the third wave will be a fusion of the two, mass shooter serial killer sets ambush, shoots a bunch of folks, escapes and vows to mass shoot again, instead of going out in one blaze of infamy, picks and chooses their spots better, hit and run and gets a couple mass shootings in. Media would lose their sh*t, thats how you one up these mass shooters and become even more infamous in the process.

Reality TV President, as postmodern as it gets.

Excellent. New Breaking Bad sequel movie in the works, you see the trailer? Skinny Pete is back, without the beanie, lulz.

Mindhunter with more than one good season, that's good to hear, one season wonderitis avoided, always a good sign.

Troll President smashes the New Dealers, then follows up with the coffin nails, so amusing. Triggering the opposition into unjustified outrage FTW.