Yzermandius19

5-4 conservative majority means your free speech hating anti-bullying laws are dead on arrival. I can count, can you?

The SCOTUS can shoot down unconstitutional state laws at their pleasure. Didn't you know that? Once these anti-bullying laws make their way to the SCOTUS, they are dead on arrival.

They will be struck down by the SCOTUS. 5-4 conservative majority, means that sh*t is dead in the water. You can pass all the free speech hating laws you want, it won't go anywhere.

Especially if Trump has the balls to replace and RBG with an Amy Coney Barrett type.

Once Trump replaces RBG, then the free speech banners are truly screwed for decades, and they are pretty screwed as it is.

Things won't change, the SCOTUS conservative majority is locked in, they will strike down criminalization of free speech because bullying. Wishful thinking is a helluva drug.

There isn't any single immigrants group I'd rather have more of than them, literally the perfect immigrants.

Hong Kong is a British dude. They are more compatible with North American culture than most North Americans, they are the perfect immigrants culturally speaking. They are most freedom loving Asians there are, and they have a grudge against communism, what more can you ask for? I'd take every last one of them.

Wrong. That's ethnocentrism.

Mean words should not be banned just because some oversensitive people kill themselves if they hear them.

True, but they would claim the average among non-whites is lower than the average among whites, and that the rich among the minorities are token outliers to trick people into thinking the policy isn't racist.

Well, if I put on the far-lefty cap for a second, then I would say that being classist is being racist, because poor people are disproportionately non-white, therefore it's just a clever way to hide you're white supremacist leanings, lulz. Their pretzel logic is quite amusing, everything is racist, at least if it conveniently demonizes those they strongly disagree with.

Cultural Chauvinism and Racial Superiority aren't the same thing, I guess marcus never got the memo. There are Cultural Chauvinists who believe in Racial Supremacy, and Racial Supremacists who believe in Cultural Chauvinism, but there are plenty of Cultural Chauvinists who don't believe in Racial Supremacy and plenty of Racial Supremacists who don't believe in Cultural Chauvinism.

That's not racism, you're going to need another term. Ignorance and a false sense of superiority, very often, have nothing to do with race. I find your attempted mind reading of racist motivations to be amateurish, at best. Stop conflating these things, as if they are completely interchangeable words that mean the same thing, they don't.

I know, I'd load up on the Hong Kong Chinese, simply pointing out that those who do want more European immigrants don't necessarily believe that because racism. There are in fact plenty of reasons someone could want more immigrants from a particular region, that have literally nothing to do with race.

There is not as much crossover between the two opinions as you think there is, and you are writing off opinions that have nothing to do with race as being racist because of it.

What makes you think that a large group of people only want more European immigrants because of their race? Is your imagination really so limited you can't possibly think of any rational reasons why someone might have that preference that have nothing to do with race?

Trump should whip the left up into an outrage about it, pretend like he's against it, using his trolling superpowers, so they start demanding it real loud like, then pull the bait and switch and "cave" to them. Now that would be some 4D Chess, right thur.

I hope Ontario will take as many Hong Kong immigrants as they can get their hands on, so they can help move Upper Canada towards being more like Hong Kong. Chaos is a ladder.

Without UKUSSA muscle to back them up, even a bastion of freedom like Milton Friedman's Hong Kong couldn't protect itself from the Chinese, and that was it's undoing. Tragic.

Hong Kong falling into the grips of the communists is an annoying set back when it comes freeing all the slaves everywhere. RIP Milton Friedman's Hong Kong, you were cool while you lasted.

Also, if Canadians want less violence being used against peaceful protesters, banning speech is not the way to get there. The more speech that is banned, the more justifications the police state has to crack down on peaceful protests and the silenced voices will be more willing to resort to violence. Don't be like the Chicoms, protip.

It's a long war, but American freedom is pretty adept at winning long wars, especially when it's enemies are a bunch of Commies trying to erect an Iron Curtain to keep out American freedom, see the Cold War.

Eventually, even the slaves clinging to Archaic British Imperialism will be freed. The Canadian Iron Curtain can't hold American freedom out forever, no matter how Anti-American reactionary those behind the curtain are. That attitude will just bring down the Iron Curtain even faster, Accelerationism FTW. God Bless America.

Sure enough, when the loop comes back around, Trump winning over the Reagan Democrats in the Rust Belt won him the Presidency. Trump never really left the Democratic Party either, they simply left him, and he exploited that mistake to great success.