Yzermandius19

You not knowing what "back in 2016" means does not constitute proof of a Quid Pro Quo only being about Biden. Political influence in foreign policy is par for the course, Trump is simply doing what all President's do, and you simply were unaware of that fact and think Trump is the only one who ever did it and should thus be impeached over it when it is just how diplomacy is done. Trump can hold up the aid, not permanently, and he didn't, delaying funds is well within his purview as POTUS, he is in charge of foreign policy, not congress. Trump is the one pushing the aid with the support of congress, congress under the Obama admin was the one holding it back. Trying to twist it into Trump being anti-Ukraine by delaying funding the Obama admin never supported, and Trump is more pro-Ukraine than his predecessor by several orders of magnitude, is just further evidence that you don't know what you are talking about.

A Liberal majority perhaps, the Conservatives are going nowhere with Scheer.

They aren't the only two, there are many, including insuring the aid wouldn't be squandered through corruption. Mulvaney did not say it had to do with Crowdstrike, some reporter said that, and he is being taken out of context, when his reply never mentioned Biden or Crowdstrike.

You have no evidence that Trump required a Quid Pro Quo to investigate Biden. You assume it's because he asked them to investigate Ukranian corruption which includes Burisma, because Joe Biden's son worked for them, but the evidence is actually that there are many reasons to want to investigate Ukranian corruption and Burisma, not just Biden. You're accusing WestCanMan of the very thing you are guilty of from the other partisan angle, and you can't see the obvious double standard and hypocrisy.

You've been living in a Communist-Lite Country for a long time, you should be used to it by now.

It is true. The Conservatives won the popular vote, not that this means anything or should mean anything.

The exception that proves the rule. Contrast PET with other Canadian politicians, and it makes them look even worse.

That's why Canadians make such shitty politicians. It's true.

Yeah but if he just ditched that baggage and learned to think critically, then he'd be great. Not that he's ever going to do that, just saying.

If it wasn't for his politics, he'd made make a great politician.

Jagmeet's wife is pretty hot, I'll give him that.

Your faith in the media is hilariously misguided. They are all Deranged Trump Haters, FOX is the only pro-Trump media of the group, and they don't even like him that much. Bandwagoners indeed, they grasp at any straw and assume that this time the football won't get pulled away, this time they will finally kick it. They are Charlie Brown and Trump is Lucy with the football, the media is so easily trolled into making themselves look like fools.

Scheer panders to Blue Liberals in Ontario as his entire election strategy, and he gains no ground with them whatsoever. What a lightweight.

Not at all. Better off with no union at all. Confederation simply put that provinces at each other's throats, things would be much better without Ottawa in the way.

Whisky!!

Liberal Minority with the Bloc having them over a barrel, muahaha. Fantastic.

Told y'all the progressives would bail on the NDP and Greens to stop Scheer.

Bloc leading in 30 seats now. Vive le Quebec libre!

Bernier looking like he's going down, disappointing.

Yeah, because Joe Clark isn't a cuckservative hack or anything, that's obviously a totally accurate representation of Harper's beliefs. He's just mad Harper wasn't as big of a cuck as he wanted him to be, even though he was still a really big cuck.

You have no proof that looking into corruption was only about the Biden's and nothing else. Asking someone to look into corruption is not a crime, whether Biden is wrapped up in it, or not. Can't prove the money was only being held up only because of the Biden angle.

Yeah but he's doing a terrible job of it, and pissing off his base, so it's backfiring.

That memo is proof of nothing. The phone call does not show that memo speculation is what happened on the call, it's all just political spin. Mulvaney did not say the Quid Pro Quo was about Biden and Crowdstrike, you are making shit up. Mulvaney said Quid Pro Quo's are standard in negotiations with foreign nations, so stop with the much ado about nothing. You simply believe the media spin about what Mulvaney said, instead of actually listening to what he actually said. Wishful thinking is a helluva drug.

He denied a Quid Pro Quo conspiracy theory that it was all about Biden. That's why he denied, because the media was spinning nonsense they had no proof of. Even if they had that proof, it's not a crime, it just looks bad from an optics point of view. Opposition research is not illegal, whether it is in the form of a quid pro quo, or it isn't.

Quid Pro Quo's are how international diplomacy works. /shrugs Welcome to foreign affairs, noob. You being totally ignorant doesn't mean Trump committed a crime.